"A.L.E.C" writes:
> On 04.08.2010 12:25, Craig Whitmore wrote:
>
>> Looking at the RFC.. and if dovecot is doing this then its going against
>> the RFC and doing it wrong. As it says "This listing of capabilities is
>> not dependent upon connection state or user."
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/sear
"Leander S." writes:
> server [~]# cat /etc/ssl/mail/mail.key
> -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
> [...]
Hmm, you have apparently posted your private key to a public maillist.
You might want to generate a new key and cert.
"Rick Romero" writes:
> Yeah.. procmail filter to modify the subject would satisfy me.
>
> I'm by no means a procmail expert, but this seems to work (though
> [Dovecot] gets put before the Re:)
>
> :0 fhw
> * ^List-Id:.*Dovecot Mailing List
> {
> :0 fhw
> * ^Subject:\/.*
> | formail -I "Sub
Noel Butler writes:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:41 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> Dovecot auth isn't case-insensitive. But MySQL is, and I guess you're
>> using it? There are several different ways around it.
>
>
> Which is not a problem since most (all) MTA's normally treat user@ as
> case
Stephan Bosch writes:
> Yes, your second rule is an elsif, meaning that it is only executed when
> the first if-condition is not 'true'. Since that first rule has a forced
> true' result, the second rule is absolutely never executed. You script
> should be:
>
> require ["fileinto","copy"];
>
> #
Timo Sirainen writes:
> Why does Dovecot add \Seen flag for mails that have been RETRed? Does
> anyone really want to use this feature? I can't remember why I
> implemented it originally, perhaps it was just "because other servers do
> that too". I'm thinking about at least changing pop3_no_fla
Peter Lindgren writes:
> H, there are more things in IMAP than just this. Mail clients (user
> agents) that are independent of the server platform, for instance.
I don't understand what you mean. Nothing I've said implies a dependence
on the server platform. The presentation of the hierarc
Timo Sirainen writes:
> I do kind of like that idea, but I don't really se how it would be
> practical here, especially if high performance is wanted.
I don't really see why a priori it would be any less performant than any
other particular RPC mechanism.
> 1. I'm not implementing Dovecot to Pl
Timo Sirainen writes:
> The big problem is what the protocol should be. Use some existing RPC
> protocol? It should be something extensible so that a plugin in imap
> process can talk to a plugin in storage process, without the base
> processes knowing anything about the details (e.g. imap-quota
Richard Hobbs writes:
> 19. Once everything is working perfectly, send an email to the entire
> company instructing them what to do after the outage and arrange an
> outage and do the following steps as soon as the outage begins:
>
> a. Unplug DMZ switch from firewall to make delivered mail
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:31 +0100, Jahnke-Zumbusch, Dirk wrote:
>> 1. I am puzzled about the credentials "i...@my.host.name" being obtained;
>> shouldn't this be
>>something like "imap/my.host.n...@my.realm" ?
>
> I don't know anything about Kerberos.
I suspect the "
> "CW" == Carlos Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CW> This folder shows up as a sub folder to his Inbox on his
CW> Thunderbird client and I tried using the "cp" command to move this
CW> over to my Maildir/ directory on the same server and when I launch
CW> Thunderbird, that
> "EK" == Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
EK> Try fileinto "Lists.NCCC", the "." is the default folder
EK> separator.
EK> It should be possible to change it to a "/" with namespaces, but
EK> it would make a cosmetic change, and judging by other posts in the
> "AM" == Adam McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AM> I have been using it for a few weeks and it has been working well,
AM> but yesterday I noticed it also seems to be escaping the \
AM> (backslash) character in folder names.
listescape has to escape '\' so that applications o
> "GE" == Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GE> When using maildir storage, is there any way to use something
GE> besides "." as the folder separator?
Please note that the following relates to dovecot 1.0. I've not looked to
see if 1.1 behaves differently.
Yes you can use a
> "NS" == Nikolay Shopik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NS> I forgot to add some MUA don't like be subscribed to folders which
NS> doesn't exist so you should probably aware of this too in case
NS> such MUA used in your environment .
While it doesn't surprise me that there may well b
> "TS" == Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TS> I'm beginning to think that maybe something more generic is
TS> needed, such as:
TS> auth default {
TS> ..
TS> environment {
TS> krb5_ktname = ..
TS> krb5ccname = ...
TS> who_knows_what_els
> "M" == Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
M> What if the script only touched the dovecot.index if it exists?
M> That would likely not be too difficult to test for with shell
M> script.
Might be tricky to do in shell without a race. On the other hand maybe a
race in this case is
> "BH" == Benjamin R Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BH> Since you're not doing anything protocol-specific (like echo "* OK
BH> [ALERT] Blah"), you could use the symlink trick to only require
BH> one script:
BH> ln -s /path/script /path/imap
BH> ln -s /path/script /pat
> "BH" == Benjamin R Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can I just touch the dovecot.index instead?
BH> Maybe. Not sure what environment variable holds its location,
BH> though. And I'm not 100% sure it always exists or whether you'd
BH> have to special-case the first-tim
> "LS" == Lars Stavholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LS> For example:
LS> /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:
LS> ...
LS> protocol lda {
LS> ...
LS> sieve_global_path = /etc/dovecot/sieve/
LS> ...
LS> }
LS> /etc/dovecot/global:
LS> if header :contains "X-S
Admittedly not a common situation but:
MAIL=maildir:~/tmp/dovecot/Maildir ./src/imap/imap
* PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR SORT THREAD=REFERENCES MULTIAPPEND
UNSELECT LITERAL+ IDLE CHILDREN NAMESPACE LOGIN-REFERRALS] Logged in as pod
01 LIST "" *
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) ".
> "KA" == Ken A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KA> Tried with -e, but sendmail says EX_NOPERM is a permanent error,
KA> and issues it's own DSN immediately. "dsn=5.0.0, stat=Insufficient
KA> permission". :-(
Not unexpected. I assumed (but neglected to express the assumption :) one
c
> "KA" == Ken A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KA> I'm testing deliver with sendmail and fs quotas.
KA> On an over quota condition, deliver accepts the mail, deletes it,
KA> then issues a MDN immediately.
KA> Is there a way to get deliver to soft fail like procmail does with
> "TS" == Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, doing it only if it's the first header would make it
>> better. I guess I could do something like that since this is a
>> pretty common problem..
TS> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/4c807839ac0c
Hasn't create_
> "RS" == Rich at Whidbey Telecom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RS> If I remember right, this is a known issue, where Mail.app won't
RS> report the quota when QUOTAROOT is "". We've found no fix for it
RS> here as it seems to be a Mail.app issue.
Our local Mac expert here informs m
> "DM" == Daniel L Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> I did make a discovery - hardcoding the sieve path, without
DM> variables, e.g. sieve = /var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/sieve -
DM> worked!
DM> Is there a problem using the domain / user variables in the
DM> configurati
> "DM" == Daniel L Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> I've tried manually compiling the script. I now have a "sieve"
DM> and a "sievec" in my mail folder, and the "sieve" variable in
DM> dovecot.conf (1.0.3) is set to /var/mail/%d/%u/sieve (The filename
DM> specified shoul
>>>>> "pod" == pod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
pod> I'd like to flag a problem we are observing that looks like it is
pod> caused by the listescape-plugin.c. I realize that this plugin is
pod> not part of the standard Dovecot 1.0 dis
log for more information.
[2007-08-30 19:33:41]
06 LIST "" *
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "a/b"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "c"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "INBOX"
06 OK List completed.
07 LOGOUT
* BYE Logging out
07 OK Logout completed.
Seemingl
> "TS" == Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TS> Well, doing it only if it's the first header would make it better.
Sure, I considered that. I note though that the save_header_callback()
from mbox-save.c also does not make this distinction and will strip a
"^From " anywhere in the
deliver appears to copy "^From " header lines from stdin when delivering
to Maildir. The header filtering in mbox-save.c prevents this when
delivering to an mbox and instead a synthesized "^From " header is
written.
This is an issue when using, for example, Postfix and
mailbox_command = /usr/l
I attach a patch that adds some informational logging for the vacation
outcome in a similar style as the 'notify', 'redirect' and 'reject' cases.
I considered adding logging for the not-willing-to-respond case since I
think that would greatly assist testing/debugging vacation responses, but
couldn
> "SG" == Sebastian Ganschow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SG> Even if I set "global_script_dir = /var/vmail" dovecot won't use
SG> the global filter.
shell$ cd dovecot-sieve-1.0.2
shell$ find . -type f -name \*.[ch] -print0 | xargs -0 grep -i -e global_script
./src/cmusieve-plugin.c:
I'd like to put forward the following patch for dovecot-sieve.
Essentially this just merges in some changes made in CMU sieve 2.3.8 and
as such brings the behaviour more in line with RFC 3834 "Recommendations
for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail":
- fixes erroneous sender "-request" substr
> "TS" == Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TS> How about if listescape plugin escaped it? That would make it
TS> possible to use them but still safe against accidental problems.
Yes, I think that would work fine at least for my particular purposes
since we'll almost certainly
> "CM" == Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CM> The only response I got did seem to have a few very good
CM> suggestions for additional conditions to test for, so I'm posting
CM> the response here to see if they can be incorporated (I'm not a
CM> coder or I'd attempt i
> "TS" == Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TS> It's mostly there just to make sure that ~/ or ~user/ can't be
TS> used to open mailboxes where you weren't supposed to have access
TS> to. I didn't think anyone would really want to have mailboxes
TS> beginning with ~. Do
In lib-storage/index/maildir/maildir-storage.c
maildir_is_valid_create_name() and maildir_is_valid_existing_name() the
following sequence of tests appear but I don't really understand why
if ((storage->flags & MAIL_STORAGE_FLAG_FULL_FS_ACCESS) != 0)
return TRUE;
if
> "BB" == Bruce Bodger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BB> The Dovecot Wiki is quite clear regarding its vacation auto-reply
BB> mechanism http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve and under what
BB> circumstances the automatic replies will NOT be sent. However, is
BB> it possible to manua
> "ed" == Ed Lucero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ed> It creates two binaries sievec and sieved. [...]
- sievec is a standalone bytecode compiler
- sieved is a standalone bytecode de-compiler
You can use them to verify that .dovecot.sieve and .dovecot.sievec are
being updated correctly by
> "TS" == Taras Savchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TS> gw# krb5-config --version
TS> FreeBSD heimdal 0.6.3 $Id: krb5-config.in,v 1.9 2002/09/09 22:29:06
joda Exp $
TS> gw# krb5-config --libs gssapi
TS> -L/usr/lib -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lasn1 -lcrypto -lroken -lcrypt -lcom_err
I'm
> "TS" == Taras Savchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TS> I have error while compiling dovecot with GSSAPI under FreeBSD
TS> 6.2: Is this dovecot-related or not?
One suspects not since none of the dovecot code directly calls into the
krb5 API. It looks like a linkage problem with /usr/
43 matches
Mail list logo
