On Wed, 2025-07-16 at 09:32 +0300, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote:
> On 8. Jul 2025, at 23.38, Genes Lists via dovecot
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2025-07-08 at 16:14 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
> > >
> > > "systemctl reload docecot&qu
On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 19:40 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
On Mon, 2025-07-14 at 01:09 +0300, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote:
On 14. Jul 2025, at 0.39, Genes Lists via dovecot
This is I see at terminal:
% sievec Active.sieve
doveconf: Fatal: Error in
On Mon, 2025-07-14 at 01:09 +0300, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote:
On 14. Jul 2025, at 0.39, Genes Lists via dovecot
<[1]dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
I can't reproduce this (tested 2.4.1 and git main). I have
ssl_server_cert_file pointing to a file only root ca
On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 23:31 +0300, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote:
> >
> >
> > (a) non-root users need access to the certificate chain in
> > order
> > to be able to run "sievec". Quirky but easy enough to work around.
>
> Which setting was it complaining about? ssl_client_* settin
On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 16:00 +0200, Andreas Haerter via dovecot wrote:
> Hi Genes,
>
> And point 3) might actually apply to a few of our environments as
> well.
> That one would have been much harder to track down, so thanks a lot
> for
> the heads-up!
Glad it might be helpful 🙂
Since it may b
On Sun, 2025-07-13 at 10:35 +0300, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
>
> > On 12/07/2025 16:08 EEST Andreas Haerter via dovecot
> > wrote:
> >
>
> No concrete decision has been made yet, but we are planning on making
> on later this year.
>
> Aki
My experience with upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4.
-
On Tue, 2025-07-08 at 16:14 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
>
> "systemctl reload docecot" crashed.
>
> systemctl start and restart work fine before and after the reload
> crash.
>
> Running on archlinux (using the arch dovecot 2.4.1 package).
>
> P
"systemctl reload docecot" crashed.
systemctl start and restart work fine before and after the reload crash.
Running on archlinux (using the arch dovecot 2.4.1 package).
Probably about 15-20 connected clients at time of crash .
Is this a known issue I wonder?
thanks
gene
Al
On Mon, 2025-06-30 at 14:41 +0200, Christian Kivalo via dovecot wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > possibly a default script).
> > 2) ensure that certificate file must readable by all users,
> > otherwise
> > sievec will fail for non-root.
>
> Regarding your point about the certificate, there has been some
On Sun, 2025-06-29 at 16:25 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
On Sun, 2025-06-29 at 15:04 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
On Sun, 2025-06-29 at 13:57 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot
wrote:
I am not yet sure, but I just renamed the "after"
On Sun, 2025-06-29 at 15:04 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
On Sun, 2025-06-29 at 13:57 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
...
sieve_script after {
driver = file
path = /etc/dovecot/sieve
active_path = default.sieve
}
I am not yet sure
On Sun, 2025-06-29 at 13:57 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
1)
With 2.4.1, when a non-root user runs sievec on their own sieve
scripts
it fails to run due to permission denied on the dovecot certificate
key
(which is only readable by root).
protocol lmtp
1)
With 2.4.1, when a non-root user runs sievec on their own sieve scripts
it fails to run due to permission denied on the dovecot certificate key
(which is only readable by root).
Specifically:
sievec active.sieve
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-
ssl.conf l
On Sat, 2025-06-07 at 20:33 +0300, Eugene R via dovecot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yeah, I had, but at that time I was not planning on eventual merge ))
>
> So, do I understand correctly that, in spite of that, it is still
> best
> to keep "my" dovecot and its config in a separate tree (and only
> merg
On Mon, 2025-05-12 at 13:37 +0300, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
>
> >
>
> We opted to go via more straightforward route of dropping gettext
> requirement, since we don't really use it for anything. The AM_ICONV
> macro was for ancient iconv() support (pre-2001).
>
> Aki
>
>
Terrific thank yo
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 14:23 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 10:30 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
After updating gettext to 0.24.1 our daily build of git
head is now
generating this error:
...
[1] https
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 10:30 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
After updating gettext to 0.24.1 our daily build of git head is now
generating this error:
autoreconf -fiv
As pointed out here [1] - the m4 macros
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 10:30 -0400, Genes Lists via dovecot wrote:
After updating gettext to 0.24.1 our daily build of git head is now
generating this error:
autoreconf -fiv
configure.ac:266: warning: macro 'AM_
rates the same error:
gettext does include the file :
/usr/share/gettext/m4/iconv.m4
Any help appreciated.
I scanned the gettex mail lists but didn't spot anything that seemed
relevant.
Thanks for any guidance.
--
Gene
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 08:06 +0300, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
>
> > O
>
> In 2.4 there is no longer plugin section at all.
>
> To configure sieve scripts
>
> see https://doc.dovecot.org/2.4.1/core/plugins/sieve.html
>
> you also must have sieve installed for this to work, otherwise the
Any advice what I am doing wrong:
I am in process of converting our 2.3 configs to 2.4.1 and sieve / sieve_script
has me stumped.
When I use:
plugin {
sieve_script xxx {
...
}
sieve_script yyy {
...
}
}
each xxx/yyy is personal or before or after etc
On Fri, 2025-04-11 at 20:22 +0300, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> ...
> Thank you for reporting this, we have been already working to fix
> this.
>
> Aki
>
Confirm that the build issue with settings-history is fixed by
commit ffebfeaea6dbd13328657decdd41418cd0cdac23
thank you.
--
Gene
s
Summary:
Our daily test builds of git head started failing on Archlinux using
gcc 14.2.1+r753+g1cd744a6828f-1
Compile error occurs on git HEAD branch main:
commit : beca41cc94dbc81cb2586aab311762bde39bdb11
Possible relevant commit:
commit 9dca2f961f83a07
On 2024-09-02 05:59, Steve Litt via dovecot wrote:
I stopped Dovecot, backed up the tens of thousands of files in
/var/spool/smtpd/offline/, then deleted them, then started Dovecot
again. Everything runs fine, so I guess those files weren't important,
at least not to Dovecot.
I also found the ma
If this isn't too far off topic, is it useful to register with https://www.dnswl.org/?p=209The only servers that reject my email do so because I use DigitalOcean. Spectrum for example. Oddly enough Linode which has a fair number of hackers doesn't get the same treatment. The only odd TLDs that ha
The thing I don't like is most 2FA token generators. Ultimately you need to transfer the polynomial that generates the code. Most do that with a QR image. Well so much for security! Others have a one time emergency code. Of course we are talking evil maid attacks, which granted is an unacceptable
It seems to me that Oauth weakens security. You allow some other system into your system. Are you running your own email server? I see you are using Gmail for the listserv.If you run your own server there are other steps I would take first other than MFA, though MFA would be the best. Geofencing a
The unicode hack is in the comments. Google "Trojan Source". Having never dealt
with Hebrew and Arabic, it was news to me there is a right to left feature in
Unicode.
TWIT Security Now (MP3): SN 843: Trojan Source - Chrome 0-days, Windows 11
confusion, VoIP DDos attacks, Dune
https://pdst.fm/e
ort 25 for authorized IPs (auth_advertise_hosts in exim), thus the server will
refuse to allow outsiders to authenticate.
In combination with some other policies, my server is practically rock solid.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För lists
Skickat: den 15 juli
I run a personal email server. I can't emphasize enough how geofencing has
reduced the useless hacking on my email server. I only leave port 25 open to
the world. I use port 587.
I maintain a list of hosting companies that I block from using my web server
since they are just going to scrape any
This has been a long thread. In summary, do this:
From 10-master.conf (when using split config files)
service pop3-login {
net_listener pop3 {
port = 0
}
inet_listener pop3s {
port = 0
ssl = yes
}
This disables pop3 listeners even when the pop3 protocol is enabled.
-
R
I meant in the firewall itself.
Usually when you set up a server none of thr ports are open in the firewall. At
some point you opened 110 and 995.
Original Message
From: d...@newideatest.site
Sent: May 4, 2021 2:41 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org; ml+dove...@valo.at
Subject: Re
Don't enable the port in the firewall. Actually two ports (encrypted and not).
110 and 995.
Original Message
From: d...@newideatest.site
Sent: May 4, 2021 1:20 AM
To: m...@f1-outsourcing.eu; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: disable pop3 ports?
Already did all of that. like I said, EVERY
Hello,I found this link in the documentation:https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/dovemon/But where can I find the program "dovemon"? I searched all over whithout luck. In the source code, Google, nothing. It seems as only the web site would exist.Can somebody help me pleaseChristian Rößner
I have found opensuse to be very stable and the upgrades to be drama free IF
(big if) you stick to the distribution repositories. For a server, sticking to
the disty repos is very likely. It is desktop users (me) that load a lot of
software from other repos that occasionally muck things up.
I r
I get about four of those a day. I was advised to learn how to use sieve. It is
on my list.
My goal is simply to dump any message with a Google form.
Original Message
From: jtam.h...@gmail.com
Sent: December 11, 2020 2:35 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: important
https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh
I used the Neilpang bash script on Centos 7.
No drama. It just works. The only thing is because it works so well I am pretty
much useless to provide help with it because it has been so flawless. The only
way I know it is running is I have to accept new
It would be worth a $5 VPS investment to set up a proper email server with
dovecot and postfix. Observe how they work together. Use maximum verbosity and
read the logs. You can use one of those cheap TLDs nobody but the spammers use.
They cost a dollar or so. Namecheap is peddling cyou.
O
And which email clients can do this?
A defacto standard needs to be adopted. If I don't provide SPF or DKIM, I am
likely to be deemed spammy, hence a defacto standard has been established. I
don't see this with TOTP.
I'm all for TOTP, but I'm not going to code my own.
Original
I would have to also hack the email client since I don't enter my 20 character
high entropy password when I send or retrieve email.
You really need an email standard to integrate TOTP. To be realistic, you need
Gmail to use it. Whatever Gmail wants is essentially a defacto standard. I live
in t
Ditto this. I pay for a VPS because I don't want my home facing the internet. If the VPS gets hacked, that is as far as they get. You could do a mail server on a $5 Digital Ocean or Linode VPS if you don't run SpamAssassin. Rather than have your email server on a 10 year old laptop, you let someo
lookups. If it is your ip, it
is an easy request to have it changed.
-Original Message-
From: Sami Ketola [mailto:s...@ketola.io]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 11:22 AM
To: lists
Cc: Arjen de Korte; Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail
As I previously stated the reverse pointer does not have to match your domain.
Suppose you ran a hosting company called host.com. Suppose you had clients
client1.com and client2.com. This requires virtual mailboxes. That is one
domain, host.com provides email services for client1.com and client
t: October 26, 2020 3:22 AMTo: li...@lazygranch.comCc: build+dove...@de-korte.org; dovecot@dovecot.orgSubject: Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server On 26. Oct 2020, at 11.36, lists <li...@lazygranch.com> wrote:Actually the reverse pointer doesn't have to m
Actually the reverse pointer doesn't have to match. In fact this is impossible
if you are setting up virtual accounts on one server for different domains. You
just need to have a reverse pointer.
Most email servers look to seen if the reverse pointer has a "dyn" in it and
blocks those.
I have used this person's blog for a few operating systems.
https://blog.andreev.it/?p=1975
Poke around for the correct OS. I only set up dovecot and postfix. Keep it
simple. You then need opendkim. I think opendkim checks the incoming mail.
There is another procedure to sign your mail.
When y
I have no problems with Gmail from Digital Ocean. But I have both spf, DKIM,
DMARC and a reverse pointer. You need to not look spammy.
One advantage to using a VPS is your IP is unique. That is you don't share it
with a spammer. Not so with hosted services.
Original Message
Good luck with all that coding. I have four years now of running my own email
server. Zero hacks. I keep the attack surface to a minimum. Less is more.
One thing you don't want to do is write your own code. This stuff is always way
harder than you think. Worse yet you run alpha generation code
You look spammy if you don't have SPF or DKIM, and hopefully both. Your email
will either be bounced or sent to a spam folder. You need a reverse pointer as
well, but that shouldn't be an issue. The situation is actually worse than it
sounds. ATT/SBC needs to whitelist you by IP if you are using
You need SPF and DKIM for your outgoing email to be accepted.
My idea of a secure email server is to use submission port 587. Expose port 25
to the world and aggressively filter all remaining email ports with a firewall.
And I mean aggressive. Geographically filter so only countries where youe
As it turns out my cert was renewed Oct 3. I usually don't reply to these "lists" from my phone since I risk the wrath of people who hate top posting. I usually reply from a Linux desktop, not the phone, where I can bottom post. All that said, my phone mail client asked me if I t
I have to say I'm totally baffled since I do nothing when LetsEncrypt renews
the certificate.
I know the cert has been updated because the mail clients asks me if I trust
the certificate.
If it makes a difference I use the bash LetsEncrypt not the Python code.
Original Message
https://blog.andreev.it/?p=1975I have set up postfix and dovecot on both centos and freebsd using this person's blog. While you are using Debian, you might find the test procedures in this blog useful. You can test the set up without using an email client. That is the testing gets around client c
I get two or three of these a day. They are not from Gmail but have a "reply
to" address that is a Gmail account. The messages cone from an email account
that passes SPF and DKIM. So the sender and reply domains differ, but that
isn't unique. I have email that I need that arrives like that.
I a
m: je...@seibercom.net
Sent: May 22, 2020 3:38 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Reply-to: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: fail2ban setup centos 7 not picking auth fail?
On Thu, 21 May 2020 23:22:04 -0700, lists stated:
>I use SSHGuard on well ssh (doh!), but supposedly you can use it for
>postfix and dove
I use SSHGuard on well ssh (doh!), but supposedly you can use it for postfix
and dovecot also. I can tell you it is well supported. I am on Centos 7 using
firewalld.
Original Message
From: a...@ddns.com.au
Sent: May 21, 2020 11:01 PM
To: voy...@sbt.net.au
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subjec
On 12-05-2020 15:45, Michael Hirmke wrote:
Hi Robert,
Hi, sorry for top post
but short answer is ,there is no exchange without outlook, that is what
makes exchange a good "groupware solution", on windows only.
So compare it to dovecot makes only small sense.
you can use Exchange with pure
> Am 11.05.2020 um 10:16 schrieb Aki Tuomi :
>
>
>> On 11/05/2020 11:10 Simone Lazzaris wrote:
>>
>>
>> In data lunedì 11 maggio 2020 10:00:38 CEST, li...@mlserv.org ha scritto:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I struggle with directory hashing. I want something like this:
>>>
>>> /srv/mail/c/cf37a8dff5e3
Hi,
I struggle with directory hashing. I want something like this:
/srv/mail/c/cf37a8dff5e360927ba10ab2
The final folder is simpel, as it is:
%{sha256;truncate=96:user}
But how do I get a first level from sha256? Unfortunately, the truncate option
aligns only full 8bit and does not divide int
Am 23.04.2020 um 17:15 schrieb Aki Tuomi :
>
>
>> On 23/04/2020 18:12 li...@mlserv.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am playing around with the COI plugin and try to get things working.
>>
>> I followed the Dovecot docs and also got the source from Github
>> (dovecot/coi).
>>
>> I have compil
Hi,
I am playing around with the COI plugin and try to get things working.
I followed the Dovecot docs and also got the source from Github (dovecot/coi).
I have compiled and installed coi successfully.
IMAP seems to be fine, but LMTP has some errors in the logs, so I removed
imap_coi for the m
Hi,
I have tried to implement last_login with PostgreSQL and I found an old thread
from June 2019. I have found a simple solution that I want to share with you:
I followed the instructions on how to set up a last_login on the official
documentation. Therefor I creates a very simple table having
My email server is set up for port 587. I block all email ports other than port
25 from countries that I will not be sending or receiving email. This is really
only practical on a personal server. I also have a blocking file of data center
IPs. Port 25 is still open to the world but that has to
On 18-03-2020 22:55, Noel Butler wrote:
On 19/03/2020 03:56, JAVIER MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ wrote:
I fully agree with this:
Please consider holding off on removing features for the next major
release, 2.4.0 instead. It makes sense to retain, in as much as is
possible, feature backwards compatibilit
Bumping one last time in hope for assistance.
On 18-02-20 6:44pm, dovecot.li...@graphyc.io wrote:
Bump? Nobody using mail-crypt right now (with user keys encrypted by
user's password to work transparently from, say, Thunderbird) who could
share their config?
On 12/02/2020 11:54 pm, Alex Knowl
Bump? Nobody using mail-crypt right now (with user keys encrypted by
user's password to work transparently from, say, Thunderbird) who could
share their config?
On 12/02/2020 11:54 pm, Alex Knowles wrote:
Hi all,
I just joined the list. I've read through the mail-crypt plugin docs
here https
I block all my email ports except 25 from countries where I am not going to be
sending or receiving email. I also block many datacenters, but blocking Digital
Ocean, Vultur and AWS will get you 90%of the way there. You will need to use
587, that is no auth on 25. Again no blocking on 25, just bl
The funny thing is AES128 may be harder to break than AES256.
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html
It had been a decade, so it would be interesting if Bruce Schneier has the same
opinion.
I just use the defaults.
Original Message
From: dovec
Hi,
For the archives, the below user_filter works nicely:
user_filter =
(&(objectclass=person)(sAMAccountName=%n)(userAccountControl=512))
But another option, taken from the samba mailinglist is:
user_filter =
(&(objectclass=person)(sAMAccountName=%n)(userAccountControl=512))(!(userAccountC
asily customize your ldap search base for accounts-to-be-deleted OU...
T.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 06:53:20PM +0100, lists wrote:
Hi,
The question can perhaps be made more generic like this:
Can dovecot generate a *specific* NDR (or an autoreply) for accounts
that meet a specific criterium, su
Hi,
The question can perhaps be made more generic like this:
Can dovecot generate a *specific* NDR (or an autoreply) for accounts
that meet a specific criterium, such as:
- user account was found under OU=to-delete,CN=company...
contrary to the regular location CN=Users,CN=company...
We would
Hi,
ldap_bind: Strong(er) authentication required (8)
additional info: BindSimple: Transport encryption required.
If you are using recent (4.7) samba, your problem could be that it
requires ssl ldap by default, unless you configure
ldap server require strong auth = no
in smb.con
Is there a more appropriate list on which to ask for assistance in
coding Sieve rules, or may I ask here?
For the archives:
On 23-8-2017 21:56, Noel wrote:
Perhaps you can adjust your query or your database to return the
desired result. Otherwise, use your scripting skills to generate a
file, then automate the procedure.
I ended up creating a file /etc/postfix/olddomain with this contents:
/^([
Hi,
Not sure what the lack of replies means... As postfix is also involved,
should I better ask there?
It seems a little bit in between postfix and dovecot...
Just to clearify one thing I wrote:
On 22-8-2017 16:23, lists wrote:
We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfi
Hi,
We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We have an
olddomain and a new domainname. To 'translate' *@olddomain into
*@newdomain, I have configured:
cat /etc/postfix/canonical
@olddomain.com @newdomain.com
While this seems to work, lately we have noticed that dovecot
Solved the problem, reporting back to the community.
/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql-user.conf had been lacking dovecot group
permissions. It was 700/root:root.
However why it wasn't reported by Dovecot explicitly in the log -- the
greatest mystery to me. Now, after deleting dovecot and all its
On 2017-02-08 00:10, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017, ygrishin-li...@mail2.ca wrote:
service dict {
unix_listener dict {
mode = 0660
user = Debian-exim
group = Debian-exim
}
}
dovecot-lda-erros.log:
**
Feb 04 14:2
Keywords: dovecot, dict, quota, postgre sql, broken pipe, remote
disconnected
Having Dovecot 2.2.22 (fe789d2) with Postgre SQL 9.5
(9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04) as the backend. I do not understand why quota
service is not working, not seeing it as a configuration error at least.
My quotas are DICT/S
I like vi (really vim), but I'm OK with Claws. I do most of my email on a
BlackBerry. (No, really.)
Original Message
From: Patrick Ben Koetter
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:15 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot?
* li...@lazygranch.com :
> So do
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-8905/Roundcube.html
Original Message
From: robert k Wild
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:22 PM
To: li...@lazygranch.com
Reply To: Dovecot Mailing List
Cc: Andreas Kalex; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Good email client to use with
So does mutt suck or not?
Original Message
From: Andreas Kalex
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:06 PM
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot?
since years mutt, 'cause it really sucks.
I tried TB or claws, evolution, opera but always returned to mutt.
Claws is an active project.
I became roundcube free when I set up my own mail server.
I simply use an email client rather than a browser. Browsers can leak.
Comments about the retired TB:
https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/
Practically what this means is that in 2016,
FWIW, I use claws, which is about the only one not mentioned.
I don't like Thunderbird. For one thing, it is in caretaker status. Mozilla
believes Web based mail is the "future." I rather not run roundcube, given I
got hacked via an unpatched roundcube back when I was using a hosting company.
I'm not a FCC lawyer, just a ham. Seems to me all you could do is "sign"
messages and not send them if the sign isn't correct. The package itself is in
plain text.
Anyway, I'll leave the thread but would like to hear about the final solution.
Original Message
From: Michael Fox
Sent: Thu
Are you 100% sure your interpretation of the FCC rules is correct? Do you
really want passwords going out over RF unencrypted?
As far as I know, only ham bands are not allowed to use encryption. Even baby
monitors these days are DECT. (Mind you, not good encryption.)
Original Message
Fro
Hi all,
is there any way of exclude messages storaged in alternate storage (*dbox
mailbox format) from being included in the quota usage?
I think this is not possible but let me ask.
Hi all,
is there any way of exclude messages storaged in alternate storage (*dbox
mailbox format) from being included in the quota usage?
I think this is not possible but let me ask.
I'm not getting a hit on "Dovecot pwck". Can you elaborate.
Original Message
From: Mobile Phone
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 3:20 AM
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Reply To: supp...@eceb.co.uk
Subject: Re: Intermittent IMAP Login failures - about 25% fail
SOLVED: Should anyone else run into this and
On 15-3-2016 14:05, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hi,
Just want to know if this is a problem at my end (in my browser), or if
it is something else.
When I copy text from the wiki, the page changes to an edit one; that is
very, very annoying. How can I stop this if it is normal dovecot wiki
behavio
Hi,
i have a dovecot setup with virtual users. Each user has 2 entries for
his mailbox. One is with the username formatted as
%username%@%default_realm% , the other %username%@%domain%
I've done some tests with it, but I don't complete understand how it works
- I've emptied all document in solr
Hi,
I'm setting up a migration between 2 dovecot servers 2.1.12 to 2.2.19 .
I've ran into some issues with dsync.
I use the following command for syncing:
doveadm -o mail_fsync=never -o imapc_host=%remote% -o
imapc_master_user=master -o imapc_password=%masterpw% -o
imapc_features="rfc822.size fe
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 12:26, mailing lists wrote:
>
>> Oct 19 12:34:51 server dovecot: dict(7540): Panic: file dict-sql.c: line 670
>> (sql_dict_iterate): assertion failed: ((ctx->flags &
>> DICT_ITERATE_FLAG_ASYNC) != 0)>
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dov
Hello everyone,
For this installation I am using passdb against AD, userdb with MySQL and nfs
storage but using simultaneously the vfile acl backend and the shared mailbox
dictionary I get the following panic:
Oct 19 12:34:51 server dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN,
rip=10.112.99.
Hello everyone,
For this installation I am using passdb against AD, userdb with MySQL and nfs
storage but using simultaneously the vfile acl backend and the shared mailbox
dictionary I get the following panic:
Oct 19 12:34:51 server dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN,
rip=10.112.99.
It now works. I have no idea why now and not yesterday. I had booted the
server yesterday and that didn't fix it.
Thank for your help.
No problem sending email, but I can't receive email. Diagnostics follow:
a login u...@domain.com password
a OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT
SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND
URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHI
On 11/10/2013 08:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.11.2013, at 20.00, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
Additionally I feel that Dovecot documentation can see some love as
well. Having the wiki as main source of documentation does not look
very polished, compared, for example to the extremely good writ
Hi Noel,
On 09/12/2013 08:54 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
[snip]
I'm always of the belief that if one person wants a feature, they might
be the only vocal person, but they are never really alone, so post your
patch, Timo can only either pull it in, or decline it, as for its useful
for others, only tim
On 08/16/2013 06:53 AM, LuKreme wrote:
Since I am using dovecot I do not have courier installed, but Courier had a
very handy
tool for making maildir folders called `maildirmake` which I used in some
automated
backup scripts. How do I duplicate maildirmake in dovecot?
Dovecot can autocreate m
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
