Re: Overquota flag and auth caching

On 09-13-2022 5:17 am, Christian Rößner wrote: The result is that mails are still accepted, even a user went over quota resulting in bounces. What is the correct way to use the over quota flag and which solutions can be taken to invalidate the user? Is it possible to do this in a Lua user back

Re: Panic: file ostream.c: assertion failed when using mail_filter on RHEL8

er: service(imap): child 589277 killed with signal 6 (core not dumped - https://dovecot.org/bugreport.html#coredumps - set /proc/sys/fs/suid_dumpable to 2) On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 12:38 +0200, Martijn Brinkers (list) wrote: > Hi, > > I installed dovecot on a new up-to-date RHEL8 test system and > con

Why was mail-filter plugin removed in version 2.3.14?

Hi, Mail-filter plugin was removed in version 2.3.14. Any idea why was this removed? Is there a replacement for the mail-filter plugin? Kind regards, Martijn Brinkers

Panic: file ostream.c: assertion failed when using mail_filter on RHEL8

Hi, I installed dovecot on a new up-to-date RHEL8 test system and configured a simple mail_filter plugin which only copies the input back to the output (i.e., the filter does nothing special). On RHEL8 I get the following panic when saving the mail. The Dovecot version that comes with RHEL8 is do

Re: Virtual question

Sorry, different email client on the road. I created the folders under my dovecot install /usr/local/etc/dovecot/virtual/ and then created month and day folders with dovecot-virtaul files in each folder. The fo

Re: Doveadm backup error.

the other end. > > Aki > > > On 20.11.2017 19:36, Dovecot list wrote: > > Hello. I try to migrate dovecot 1 to dovecot 2 with doveadm backup. > > But when i try to set doveadm backup i get : > > > > mx3:/root/dsync@[23:11] # doveadm -v -c ah.temp backup -R

Re: Doveadm backup error.

/i-pi.pl/ahu...@i-pi.pl> mailmdbox:~/mdbox quota_rule *:storage=5M mx3:/root/dsync@[22:14] # id 145 uid=145(vmail) gid=145(vmail) groups=145(vmail) mx3:/root/dsync@[1:14] # doveconf -n | grep 145 first_valid_uid = 145 last_valid_uid = 145 Thank for any hints. Best regards. 2017-11

Doveadm backup error.

Hello. I try to migrate dovecot 1 to dovecot 2 with doveadm backup. But when i try to set doveadm backup i get : mx3:/root/dsync@[23:11] # doveadm -v -c ah.temp backup -R -u a...@test.pl imapc: doveadm(a...@test.pl ): Error: Mail access for users with UID 145 not permitted (see first_valid_uid in

Re: Migrating from Dovecot 1 to Dovecot 2

Thanks for reply. I try to make it, but @start i get this error. mx3:/root/dsync@[23:11] # doveadm -v -c ahuryn.temp backup -R -u t...@test.pl imapc: doveadm(t...@test.pl): Error: Mail access for users with UID 145 not permitted (see first_valid_uid in config file, uid from userdb lookup). doveadm(

Migrating from Dovecot 1 to Dovecot 2

Hello. I try to migrate about 200G of mails from one server to another. On the old i have Dovecot1 with Maildirs (without master pass etc.), on the new one i setup dovecot2 with mdbox. I need now to migrate (partialy, not all at once) mails from one to another. I can't find any solution that i can

Re: Locking Errors

> On Oct 12, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Bill Shirley > wrote: > > doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file > /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf line 27: Invalid size: $default_vsz_limit > > Have you though about fixing the configuration error? > > Bill > > O

Re: Locking Errors

> On Oct 12, 2017, at 8:56 AM, Bill Shirley wrote: > > Is everyone's email going to /mail/user/Maildir ? > > What's the output of 'dovecot -n' ? > > Bill > > On 10/12/2017 9:47 AM, List wrote: >> We recently upgraded to version 2.2.10-8 on

Locking Errors

We recently upgraded to version 2.2.10-8 on Centos 7 (from 2.2.10-7) and immediately started experiencing errors in the log file that look like this: Error: Broken file /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist line 891: Invalid data: Error: Timeout (180s) while waiting for lock for transaction log file

Re: OT: Central sieve management

> On May 29, 2015, at 7:46 AM, Robert Blayzor wrote: > > On May 28, 2015, at 4:24 PM, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote: >> >> A bit off topic, but I was wondering if anyone here has a solution for >> centrally managing sieve for multiple users from a custom web application? >> We would like to i

OT: Central sieve management

A bit off topic, but I was wondering if anyone here has a solution for centrally managing sieve for multiple users from a custom web application? We would like to implement pigeonhole sieve on our dovecot cluster, however we need to be able to access user’s sieve configurations from a central l

JMAP support

Just found http://jmap.io/ which is a JSON based RPC protocol for synchronizing messages/contacts/calendars. Any plans to support this protocol in Dovecot?

Re: dovecot and glusterfs

On 1/13/15, 6:02 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2015, 21:40:34 schrieb Nick Edwards: On 1/13/15, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: Hi, I did some experiments with dovecot on a glusterfs on the active nodes without a director. So I had concurrent access to the files. With

imapc only backing up INBOX

I am attempting to pull email from gmail IMAP to my local machine and with the configuration I have I only seem to get messages from the INBOX folder. Hoping I could get some assistance getting all the gmail folders to download. Here is the imapc config: imapc_host = 64.233.171.108 imapc_use

Re: Required SSL with exceptions

On 12/9/14, 12:50 AM, SATOH Fumiyasu wrote: Hi, At Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:01:43 -0600, List wrote: Essentially we would like to host IMAP with SSL enforced for any connections coming from anywhere except the subnet where our other mail servers reside. The idea is to not install a local

Re: Required SSL with exceptions

On 12/8/14, 1:45 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 08.12.2014 um 19:41 schrieb List: I have a Dovecot cluster which is on separate machines from my webmail/caldav/cardav cluster, and I currently have the system setup with ssl = required. Unfortunately the caldav/cardav server I am running

Required SSL with exceptions

I have a Dovecot cluster which is on separate machines from my webmail/caldav/cardav cluster, and I currently have the system setup with ssl = required. Unfortunately the caldav/cardav server I am running doesn't support STARTTLS so I was wondering if there is a way to still enforce ssl for ev

doveadm backup gmail using imapc

I am trying to sync a gmail inbox with dovecot 2.2.10 using the following config: imapc_host = 64.233.171.108 imapc_user = %u imapc_master_user = master imapc_password = secret imapc_features = rfc822.size imapc_features = $imapc_features fetch-headers mail_prefetch_count = 20 # If the old IMAP

Exporting plain_pass using passwd driver

I am trying to get a postlogin script running that can see the plain_pass=%w while running the passwd driver. This is running Dovecot 2.0.7 and so far everything I have tried results in the value being empty.

Postlogin script in v1

Does dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 support postlogin scripting?

Object storage

Timo, We are contemplating building an S3 compatible cluster of storage servers using Pithos and Cassandra to get multi data center redundancy and availability. Would it be possible to have multiple Dovecot servers in disparate geographical locations all t

[Dovecot] NoSQL support

Is there any support for NoSQL databases such as Cassandra (CQL) or MongoDB now or planned in the future for userdb and passdb lookups?

Re: [Dovecot] Can't get authentication for masterusers on Mac OS X Server 10.6.8

Try getting more verbose logs using dovecot's logging mechanisms. auth_verbose=yes auth_debug=yes It seems that you aren't authenticating your master users against your passwd file, instead you are authenticating against your OpenDirectory.

Re: [Dovecot] Can't get authentication for masterusers on Mac OS X Server 10.6.8

Since you've defined verbose auth logging you should get some interesting log files about your failed login attempts that could point us in the right direction. Matthijs On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Gilles Celli wrote: > Hi dovecot masters, > > This is my first post here,

Re: [Dovecot] 2 users database on same LDAP with different mail location

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:29:37PM +0100, l...@grootstyr.eu wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:42:33AM +0100, Francesco wrote: > > Hello, > > i know i know, i'm getting annoying but appearently i always come up > > with weird ideas and i cant seem to accomplish such a task. > > > > the scenario i

Re: [Dovecot] 2 users database on same LDAP with different mail location

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:42:33AM +0100, Francesco wrote: > Hello, > i know i know, i'm getting annoying but appearently i always come up > with weird ideas and i cant seem to accomplish such a task. > > the scenario is that i have an LDAP server with a bunch of users. > some of them are in a spe

Re: [Dovecot] Basic clustered filesystem advice

On 9/18/13 11:20 AM, Tim Groeneveld wrote: - Original Message - On 9/17/13 3:23 PM, Andreas Gaiser wrote: Does anybody know about GlusterFS & Dovecot? Time marches on, and I need to continue the service migration. I'd still like to use Dovecot (we're migrating away from Cyrus). I'm

Re: [Dovecot] Basic clustered filesystem advice

On 9/17/13 3:23 PM, Andreas Gaiser wrote: Does anybody know about GlusterFS & Dovecot? ...Andreas Time marches on, and I need to continue the service migration. I'd still like to use Dovecot (we're migrating away from Cyrus). I'm assuming the only other alternative without existing shared st

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.1.1 crash

Dovecot RPM from atrpms crashed, here are the logs: Aug 31 11:55:08 10.123.128.231 dovecot: imap(user@domain): Panic: Message count decreased Aug 31 11:55:08 10.123.128.231 dovecot: imap(user@domain): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x4184a) [0x7f144f00384a] -> /usr/l

Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing.

larger stream make it work. Thanks, Steve -Original Message- From: Steffen Kaiser Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:02 AM To: Dovecot Mailing List Cc: Torpey List Subject: Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 O

Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing.

-Original Message- From: Steffen Kaiser Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:02 AM To: Dovecot Mailing List Cc: Torpey List Subject: Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Jan 2013, Torpey List wrote

Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing.

-Original Message- From: Torpey List Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 9:50 AM To: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing. -Original Message- From: Thomas Leuxner Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 9:03 AM To: Dovecot

Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing.

-Original Message- From: Thomas Leuxner Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 9:03 AM To: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing. Am 01.01.2013 um 15:44 schrieb "Torpey List" : I don't use Sendmail myself so I can'

Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing.

-Original Message- From: Ben Morrow Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 8:52 PM To: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: [Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing. At 5PM -0600 on 31/12/12 you (Torpey List) wrote: >> Sendmail 8.14.4 >> dovecot 2.0.9 >>

[Dovecot] From Sendmail to Dovecot mdbox, what is missing.

Sendmail 8.14.4 dovecot 2.0.9 I have sendmail working and it is sending mail to /var/mail/%u. I have dovecot working in that I can move emails into IMAP folders and I can send email through IMAP. I have set up dovecot to use mdbox based on the following: mail_location = mdbox:~/mail However,

Re: [Dovecot] maildir_copy_with_hardlinks on v.2.0.19

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 23.7.2012, at 22.12, mailing list subscriber wrote: > >> As requested, here is my update. As you can see I am running now the >> latest release however emails delivered through lmtp gets split into >> different f

Re: [Dovecot] Fwd: official dev team position regarding multiple times requested feature (global sieve)

previous message was intended for the other imap server :) On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > What is the purpose of this posting? > > > On 7/24/2012 9:27 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote: >> >> forwarding to the proper list address since your reply

[Dovecot] Fwd: official dev team position regarding multiple times requested feature (global sieve)

forwarding to the proper list address since your reply came with a Reply-To header -- Forwarded message -- From: mailing list subscriber Date: Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:24 AM Subject: Re: official dev team position regarding multiple times requested feature (global sieve) To: awill

Re: [Dovecot] maildir_copy_with_hardlinks on v.2.0.19

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 2:59 PM, mailing list subscriber wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get the so-called "single instance store" (I think cyrus > has got the name for the first time) with dovecot --version = 2.0.19 > binary package installed from ubuntu 12.04 lt

[Dovecot] maildir_copy_with_hardlinks on v.2.0.19

the above data, what (am I | dovecot is) doing wrong? Please cc me if you need additional input when replying as I'm not subscribed to the list (I'll watch the thread online only) Many thanks in advance.

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2010 very slow when using IMAP - are there any tweaks?

Il 02/07/2012 16:34, Kaya Saman ha scritto: Hi, though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot? The reason why I am asking is that I have setup a Dovecot 2.1.7 server on FreeBSD which works fantastically with Thunderbird but Outlook see

Re: [Dovecot] moving from BSD to Ubuntu

Il 30/06/2012 22:19, spamv...@googlemail.com ha scritto: hi.. im planning to move my Mailserver from an FreeBSD Box to an Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Box. Hi, I recently migrated to ubuntu 12.04 (not from freebsd) the only problem was this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/101690

Re: [Dovecot] auth service: out of memory

Il 29/06/2012 09:45, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: On 29.6.2012, at 10.39, Mailing List SVR wrote: Il 29/06/2012 09:19, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: On 29.6.2012, at 9.35, Mailing List SVR wrote: I have some out of memory errors in my logs (file errors.txt attached) How large is your auth

Re: [Dovecot] auth service: out of memory

Il 29/06/2012 09:19, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: On 29.6.2012, at 9.35, Mailing List SVR wrote: I have some out of memory errors in my logs (file errors.txt attached) How large is your auth process's VSZ when it starts up and has handled a couple of logins? It's possible that it

[Dovecot] auth service: out of memory

Hi, I have some out of memory errors in my logs (file errors.txt attached) I'm using dovecot 2.0.19, I can see some memory leaks fix in hg after the 2.0.19 release but they seem related to imap-login service, I attached my config too, is something wrong there? Should I really increase the li

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.19 segfault

Il 24/06/2012 00:49, Mailing List SVR ha scritto: Il 24/06/2012 00:05, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 22:39 +0200, Mailing List SVR wrote: after the upgrade from dovecot 2.0.13 (ubuntu oneiric) to dovecot 2.0.19 (ubuntu precise), in my logs I have a lot of these errors: Jun

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.19 segfault

Il 24/06/2012 00:05, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 22:39 +0200, Mailing List SVR wrote: after the upgrade from dovecot 2.0.13 (ubuntu oneiric) to dovecot 2.0.19 (ubuntu precise), in my logs I have a lot of these errors: Jun 23 00:20:29 server1 dovecot: master: Error: service

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.19 segfault

Il 24/06/2012 00:05, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 22:39 +0200, Mailing List SVR wrote: after the upgrade from dovecot 2.0.13 (ubuntu oneiric) to dovecot 2.0.19 (ubuntu precise), in my logs I have a lot of these errors: Jun 23 00:20:29 server1 dovecot: master: Error: service

Re: [Dovecot] 2.0.19 segfault

Il 23/06/2012 22:39, Mailing List SVR ha scritto: Hi, after the upgrade from dovecot 2.0.13 (ubuntu oneiric) to dovecot 2.0.19 (ubuntu precise), in my logs I have a lot of these errors: Jun 23 00:20:29 server1 dovecot: master: Error: service(imap-login): child 6714 killed with signal 11

[Dovecot] 2.0.19 segfault

e84b10) at ioloop.c:384 ioloop = 0x7f4d03e3e680 t_id = 2 #11 0x7f4d025b6d27 in io_loop_handler_run (ioloop=) at ioloop-epoll.c:213 ctx = 0x7f4d03e505a0 events = 0x6579351d event = 0x7f4d03e50610 list = 0x7f4d03e93690 io = tv = {t

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot and unison

ady using to sync much of my home dir about once a day. > > I found at least one positive message regarding this topic > (http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-April/048092.html), but I feel I > could use some more advice. I have a similar setup, but I use offlineimap instead of uni

[Dovecot] dovecot 2.1 breaks FTS + pre-auth?

vecot/imap * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS SPECIAL-

Re: [Dovecot] distributed mdbox

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:03:01 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 23.3.2012, at 19.43, > wrote: > >>> Have you tried stress testing it with imaptest? Run in parallel for both >>> servers: >> I did stress test it, but we have developed a "mail bot net" tool for the >> purpose. I should mention this

Re: [Dovecot] distributed mdbox

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:06:25 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 23.3.2012, at 15.39, > wrote: > >> I was able to get dovecot working across a gluster cluster a few weeks >> ago >> and it worked just fine. I would recommend using the native gluster >> mount >> option (need to install gluster soft

Re: [Dovecot] distributed mdbox

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:56:12 -0600, James Devine wrote: > Anyone know how to setup dovecot with mdbox so that it can be used through > shared storage from multiple hosts? I've setup a gluster volume and am > sharing it between 2 test clients. I'm using postfix/dovecot LDA for > delivery and I'm

[Dovecot] Dovecot and scalable database storage

I saw some interesting mails from TImo back in 2009 talking about the idea of using something like Cassandra db or similar as a storage platform for both email and index/logs. I was wondering if this has been discussed since then, and if there are any plans to support something like this in the fu

Re: [Dovecot] v2.1.2 released

ch anything you want with Dovecot > proxy/director. > > This release also includes the initial version of dsync-based > replication. I'm already successfully using it for @dovecot.fi mails, > but it still has some problems. See > http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-March

Re: [Dovecot] Post-login scripting - Trash cleanup

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:26:11 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 28.02.2012 19:11, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net: >> We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older >> than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did >> this >> cause logins to slow dow

[Dovecot] Post-login scripting - Trash cleanup

We are considering using the post-login scripting to clear trash older than 90 days from user accounts. has anyone done this, and if so did this cause logins to slow down too much waiting for the trash to purge? One idea was to execute the trash purge script once a day by tracking their logins an

Re: [Dovecot] Multiple locations, 2 servers - planning questions...

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:38:39 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-02-27 1:34 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Charles Marcus wrote: >>> Each location is an entire floor of a 6 story building. The remote >>> location has the capacity for about 60 users, the new location about >>> 100. We only allow IM

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v2.2 plans

On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:51:59 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 15.2.2012, at 5.08, > wrote: > >> I know you mentioned you would cover this in a coming post, but we were >> curious what the new dsync replication will be capable of. Would it >> monitor changes to mailboxes and push automatic repl

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot v2.2 plans

On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:47:06 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Here's a list of things I've been thinking about implementing for Dovecot > v2.2. Probably not all of them will make it, but I'm at least interested in > working on these if I have time. > > Previously I&#x

[Dovecot] Vacation via database

We are moving our inbound mail to use dovecot LMTP in the near future and we are looking for suggestions on how to implement a mysql based vacation system. If anyone has experience with this, good or bad please let us know.

Re: [Dovecot] Fault tolerant architecture

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:14:19 -0200, Marcelo Salhab Brogliato wrote: > Hi, > I'm new to this list and want your help. > I'm the mail admin for some domains in Rio de Janeiro - Brazil. Today we > have only one machine running dovecot (imap+pop3) with local mail. > We are

[Dovecot] ODBC support

I was wondering if ODBC support was on the road map for Dovecot, or if it has ever been discussed? Thanks.

Re: [Dovecot] Converting from qpopper mbox to dovecot maildir

On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 13:41:02 -0700 (PDT), Joseph Tam wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote: > >> We have an older mail server using qpopper and the mbox format which we >> need to update to dovecot and maildir format. I have read through the >> docs >> on migrating from mbox t

[Dovecot] Converting from qpopper mbox to dovecot maildir

We have an older mail server using qpopper and the mbox format which we need to update to dovecot and maildir format. I have read through the docs on migrating from mbox to maildir, as well as a few nuggets on how to migrate from qpopper to dovecot, and I was wondering if I could get some suggesti

Re: [Dovecot] Mysql access denied

On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:48:58 +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote: > Op 23-6-2011 15:37, l...@airstreamcomm.net [1] schreef: > Currently using dovecot 2.0.12 and mysql server 4.0.20 (I know, it's > really old) and having issues getting Dovecot to authenticate to the > mysql > server. We have confirmed th

[Dovecot] Mysql access denied

Currently using dovecot 2.0.12 and mysql server 4.0.20 (I know, it's really old) and having issues getting Dovecot to authenticate to the mysql server. We have confirmed that the credentials are correct and the host machine can access the database, however we are getting the following error: Jun

Re: [Dovecot] SQL config error

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:14:10 +0200, Pascal Volk wrote: > On 06/22/2011 07:35 PM l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote: >> Currently using 2.0.12, configured the auth-sql.conf to look like this >> for >> password lookups (doing smtp auth with postfix, so I am not actually >> running pop or imap, just auth):

[Dovecot] SQL config error

Currently using 2.0.12, configured the auth-sql.conf to look like this for password lookups (doing smtp auth with postfix, so I am not actually running pop or imap, just auth): passdb { driver = sql connect = host=server.net dbname=passwd user=sqluser password='password' default_pass_scheme

[Dovecot] Isilon OneFS storage

I am wondering if anyone has any experience with the Isilon OneFS storage system (http://www.isilon.com/) using NFS to host storage for Dovecot. Thanks

Re: [Dovecot] Dotlock dovecot-uidlist errors / NFS / High Load

Timo & friends, We have not posted in a long time regarding this issue, but I wanted to update everyone that it was indeed an NTP issue. We have since put together stratum 2 servers on physical hardware (as opposed to virtual machines) which now act as the source for our cluster of dovecot machin

Re: [Dovecot] NoSQL Storage Backend

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:48:56 -0800, Marc Villemade wrote: > Hey Marten, > > As a disclaimer, I work with Scality. > > Thank you guys for letting us know about the typo in the URL for dovecot > on the website. > I have tried to reply to the email that sent us the information to thank > them, but

[Dovecot] Storing Dovecot index files on sql

We have been communicating with the mailling list on another thread regarding dotlocking on the dovcot-uidlist over an NFS share, and I was hoping to get some ideas on whether or not a sql database would be a suitable location for storing the dovecot index files. Our though process so far has

Re: [Dovecot] Dotlock dovecot-uidlist errors / NFS / High Load

On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:11:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 25.1.2011, at 1.06, wrote: > >> Multi-server setup that tries to flush NFS caches: >> >> dotlock_use_excl = no # only needed with NFSv2, NFSv3+ supports O_EXCL >> and >> it's faster > > You're probably using NFSv3, right? Then this

Re: [Dovecot] Dotlock dovecot-uidlist errors / NFS / High Load

On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:13:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 24.1.2011, at 23.06, wrote: > >> We tested the patch you suggested with no success. We are seeing >> timestamps straying into the 100's of seconds of difference, which does >> not >> reflect the perceivable drift that shows on our sy

Re: [Dovecot] Dotlock dovecot-uidlist errors / NFS / High Load

nd per Stan's suggestions earlier we are rebuilding the stratum 2 machines on bare metal hardware (not in a virtual machine) to be sure the clocks will be super stable. I guess what I am asking is if you have ever seen an issue similar to this and if NTP actually played a role. I have spent s

Re: [Dovecot] Dotlock dovecot-uidlist errors / NFS / High Load

Timo, Thanks for the quick reply! We are building an rpm with the patch and will test this week and report back with our findings. We are grateful for your help and the chance to communicate directly with the author of dovecot! Michael On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:18:16 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:

[Dovecot] Fwd: Re: Dotlock dovecot-uidlist errors / NFS / High Load

Stan, Thanks for the reply. In our case we have actually already done most of the work you suggested to no avail. We had rebuilt two new ntp servers that sync against two stratum 1 sources, and all our nfs clients, regardless of using dovecot, sync to those two machines. You bring up the differ

[Dovecot] Dotlock dovecot-uidlist errors / NFS / High Load

As of late our four node dovecot 1.2.13 cluster has been experiencing a massive number of these dotlock errors: Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time (1295480202 vs 1295479784): /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist These dotlock errors correspond with very high load averag

[Dovecot] Upgrading from 1.2 to 2.0

Greetings Dovecot mailing list! We are an ISP that recently migrated from Courier to Dovecot, and are looking at the next round of upgrades. Hoping that we could get pointed to some documentation or get a general list of best practices for an upgrade from 1.2.13 to 2.0.9. Our current

[Dovecot] pop3-login: auth failure -- due to number as first character in login name

Seem to have found a error in version 1.2.6 regarding usernames having a number as the first character. Customers with a number as the first character in thier user name can not login via pop3 clients. However they can login through our webmail interface. If we remove the number from the usernam

[Dovecot] "dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line" error

This is with respect to an error that I am facing in dovecot. The error is that is seen in logs is "Feb 23 00:04:46 mailblade1 dovecot: IMAP(USERNAME): /indexes/USERNAME/.INBOX/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 7: 1234776125.M559298P3988.s2o.qlc.co.in,S=13111,W=13470:2, (uid 94277 -> 9

[Dovecot] Public (Shared Folders) ACL Questions

All I want to do is to allow 1 user admin privileges to create & delete anything but all other users should only be able to create not delete. Reading through the mailing list I thought a /etc/dovecot-acls/.DEFAULT file would be suitable but what should be put in here to achieve what I want?

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve Broken with 1.1 RPMs?

! Gavin On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 13:40 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote: > Hi Gavin, > > On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Mailing List wrote: > > Previously (in v1.0) we did not need the plugin section: > > sieve = mailfilter.sieve > > > > Is this now required even when just wanting

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve Broken with 1.1 RPMs?

Thanks for taking the time to respond Patrick. Previously (in v1.0) we did not need the plugin section: sieve = mailfilter.sieve Is this now required even when just wanting to use a global sieve script? We have ~100 users so manually adding a mailfilter.sieve file to each users directory will be

[Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve Broken with 1.1 RPMs?

We have been using dovecot v1:1.0.15-1_72 and dovecot-sieve v1.0.3-7 very successfully for many months but I've been unable to get dovecot-sieve to work with the latest 1.1 release. The new release seems to completely ignore our global sieve script no matter what we do. Is anyone else using the at

Re: [Dovecot] netapp/maildir/dovecot performance

On 3/25/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:19 -0400, bofh list wrote: > We are seeing some poor performance recently that is focused around > users with large mailboxes (100,000 message /INBOX, 80,000 message > subfolders, etc). > > Th

Re: [Dovecot] netapp/maildir/dovecot performance

On 3/22/07, Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... What operating system are you using? Performance over NFS is tremendously different. And each OS can be tweaked differently. You should try noatime (noxattr on solaris) regardless. RHEL4u3 64-bit. I will try noatime. Thanks

[Dovecot] netapp/maildir/dovecot performance

We are seeing some poor performance recently that is focused around users with large mailboxes (100,000 message /INBOX, 80,000 message subfolders, etc). The performance problem manifests as very high system% utilization - basically iowait for NFS. There are two imap servers with plenty of horsep

Re: [Dovecot] tb-negative-fetch workaround

On 3/13/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... I'm running out of ideas. Check with rawlog what exactly Dovecot and Thunderbird are talking to each others (http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html). Are there any large UIDs either? What is Thunderbird doing just before it sends that command?

Re: [Dovecot] tb-negative-fetch workaround

On 3/13/07, Troy Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: bofh list wrote: > > Cool - the user is using linux but I would imagine the changes to > accomplish this are minor! (could you *please* turn off sending HTML email to this list? argh.) I don't think it is unreasonable to

Re: [Dovecot] tb-negative-fetch workaround

On 3/13/07, Troy Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Timo Sirainen wrote: > > I'm running out of ideas. Check with rawlog what exactly Dovecot and > Thunderbird are talking to each others > (http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html). Are there any large UIDs either? > What is Thunderbird doing just before

Re: [Dovecot] tb-negative-fetch workaround

On 3/13/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:11 -0400, bofh list wrote: > > The current command did not succeed. the mail server > responded: > > error in imap command uid: invalid body[..] parameter. >

Re: [Dovecot] tb-negative-fetch workaround

On 3/13/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:01 -0400, bofh list wrote: > Hi, > > I notice in the Changelog that the tb-negative-fetch workaround > shouldn't be needed any longer. We have a user running Thunderbird > 1.5.0.8 tha

  1   2   >