[Dovecot] Maildir

2011-04-01 Thread Walt Shekrota
I noticed in Cyrus they seem to address maildir++ recognised by IMAP. I need to know does Dovecot recognise this format? Procmail has an ability to deliver mails to different folders which if unrecognised renders the whole process useless. Does Dovecot have a similar deliver method? Thanks. -Wa

[Dovecot] Mail_location and formats

2011-03-31 Thread Walt Shekrota
Hi, Ok I know that the Maildir hierarchical structure works because I saw it intermittantly in my setup. At times I could look at ALL folders in my client. mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs http://wiki1.dovecot.org/MailLocation/Maildir this says 1.1 only? My maildir folder has a coll

[Dovecot] debugging mail_location issues

2011-03-30 Thread Walt Shekrota
Type of Maildir structure I am using came from KDE. No '.'s just folders. something like Maildir/ INBOX mail-sent outbox other where each has cur new and tmp folders. if I access this directory with IMAP it creates cur new and tmp in the root. ie Maildir/ INBOX cur new tmp mail-sent ou

Re: [Dovecot] log

2011-03-30 Thread Walt Shekrota
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:28:49PM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote: > On 03/30/2011 06:16 PM Walt Shekrota wrote: > > does the following indicate TLS is configured? > > > > 2011-03-30 10:37:07 auth(default): Info: client out: OK 1 user=wshek > > 2011-03-30 10:37:07 aut

[Dovecot] v1.2.12 and debug

2011-03-30 Thread Walt Shekrota
Is there some kind of extended debug that might show why my maildir is not foundat login? It has worked off and on, once briefly today then no more. I'm going around twiddling knobs guessing at this point which is foolish. I need some real bread crumbs to indicate what is going wrong. I've tried a

[Dovecot] log

2011-03-30 Thread Walt Shekrota
does the following indicate TLS is configured? 2011-03-30 10:37:07 auth(default): Info: client out: OK 1 user=wshek 2011-03-30 10:37:07 auth(default): Info: master in: REQUEST 2 13371 1 2011-03-30 10:37:07 auth(default): Info: passwd(wshek,127.0.0.1): lookup 2011-03-30 10:37:07

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot.conf

2011-03-30 Thread Walt Shekrota
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:14:32PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 30.3.2011, at 17.02, Walt Shekrota wrote: > > > In 1.2.12 or there abouts how do changes in the dovecot.conf happen? > > After doing the sig HUP I have noted there is generally a delay in the > > recognit

[Dovecot] dovecot.conf

2011-03-30 Thread Walt Shekrota
In 1.2.12 or there abouts how do changes in the dovecot.conf happen? After doing the sig HUP I have noted there is generally a delay in the recognition of items in my .conf. An example I had logging set off, turned it on and it was several restarts before I again saw logging? This delay is drivi

[Dovecot] 1.2 problem 'dovecot -n' vs dovecot.conf

2011-03-29 Thread Walt Shekrota
To elaborate, if there is a database associated with this setup it is really fubar. note: tail of dovecot -n lda: postmaster_address: postmaster mail_plugins: sieve quota_full_tempfail: yes deliver_log_format: msgid=%m: %$ rejection_reason: Your message to <%t> was automatically rejecte

Re: [Dovecot] doveadm

2011-03-29 Thread Walt Shekrota
On Tuesday 29 March 2011 13:38:23 Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Patrick Domack : > > It doesn't exist. > > > > doveadm belongs in dovecot 2.x, but ubuntu only has 1.x versions. > > Try Christians builds: > > > > p@rick Ok I see

[Dovecot] dovecot.conf settings vs 'dovecot-n' output

2011-03-29 Thread Walt Shekrota
I am curious why these do not seem to match? It especially bothers me that the modes set are different. Am I missing something? Thanks. -Walt

[Dovecot] doveadm

2011-03-29 Thread Walt Shekrota
Hi Where does this utility reside for installation. I use Ubuntu and installed dovecot-imapd and dovecot-pop3d so far. Does it now ship in the regular dovecot installation packages? Thanks. -Walt

[Dovecot] file permissions

2011-03-28 Thread Walt Shekrota
Dovecot 1.2.12 maildir format using :LAYOUT=fs (my Mail dir came from KDE) I can't remember the permissions of the /Mail/ directory because I haven't been concerned with it too much until now. I think they were user:user or user:mail. Now a new mail ends up 600 root:mail. (in alternate directori