I use dovecot-lda to deliver incoming email from Exim to Dovecot.
After having some problems with email bounces with empty envelope sender
not being delivered because of an empty -f argument, I discovered that
Exim can pass email to Dovecot using dovecot-lda without using the -f
argument at al
I've had a number of Dovecot installs happily running for quite a few
years now, but I've just stumbled over a new issue. I am trying to get
some iPhones to do server-side email searches through
ActiveSync/Exchange protocol -> Horde -> Dovecot.
The bit I can't figure out is if I need to enable
On 04/12/17 23:15, Steve Litt wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Joseph Tam wrote:
"Davide Marchi" writes:
UW-IMAP's mailutil, imapsync, YippieMove and Larch.
Whatever you use, *don't* use UW-IMAP's mailutil unless you got lots
of time to kill. It is dreadfully slow -- I used
On 23/08/17 09:11, m...@caloro.ch wrote:
Hello Together
Please witch add-on possibilities exist to synchronize the Calednar with
Dovecot and Postfix.
Can give me here any a possible direction ?
A shout here for Horde. I have installed and configured over the years
several instances
On 22/08/17 01:56, Peter wrote:
Lest anyone think STARTTLS MITM doesn't happen,
https://threatpost.com/eff-calls-out-isps-modifying-starttls-encryption-commands/109325/3/
Right, the attack does happen, but it can be prevented by properly
configuring the server and client.
Not only for securi
On 21/08/17 22:18, Joseph Tam wrote:
Lest anyone think STARTTLS MITM doesn't happen,
https://threatpost.com/eff-calls-out-isps-modifying-starttls-encryption-commands/109325/3/
Not only for security, I prefer port 993/995 as it's just plain simpler
to initiate SSL from the get-go rather t
On 21/08/17 16:25, Robert Wolf wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 21/08/17 13:39, Robert Wolf wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote:
On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
is there a 'preferred way'?
On 21/08/17 13:39, Robert Wolf wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote:
On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or
993 over 143? or?
There is no concr
On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote:
On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or
993 over 143? or?
There is no concrete answer. There are various opinions and feelings about this.
The opinion againt 993/995 is that the
On 21/08/17 00:28, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
just setting a new Dovecot server to migrate from older system, but, I
have a general question:
1. I've set the server with self issued cert, and both pop/imap
StartTLS/110/143 SSL/993/995 (apologies if I'm using wrong naming
terminology)
is there a
On 11/06/13 08:18, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 11.06.2013 09:00, schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
At the moment, if one of the interfaces specified with "listen=" in
dovecot.conf is not up when Dovecot is started,
then Dovecot just refuses to start. Is there an option to make Dovecot
start a
On 11/06/13 00:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.06.2013 21:04, schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
On 10/06/13 13:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.06.2013 11:45, schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
At the moment, if one of the interfaces specified with "listen=" in
dovecot.conf is not up when Dovecot
On 10/06/13 13:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.06.2013 11:45, schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
At the moment, if one of the interfaces specified with "listen=" in
dovecot.conf is not up when Dovecot is started,
then Dovecot just refuses to start. Is there an option to make Dovecot start
a
At the moment, if one of the interfaces specified with "listen=" in
dovecot.conf is not up when Dovecot is started, then Dovecot just
refuses to start. Is there an option to make Dovecot start anyway, and
just use the interface when it becomes available? It is inconvenient to
have Dovecot refus
On 20/05/13 23:40, Gedalya wrote:
On 05/20/2013 05:13 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 20/05/13 17:12, Gedalya wrote:
On 05/20/2013 12:02 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Exim doesn't seem to have any variable expansion for the "From" field
If using the From header actually mak
On 21/05/13 01:38, Gedalya wrote:
On 05/20/2013 07:37 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
That's an interesting one. I've been running several sites for a few
years now with exim in smart relay - without connection_max_messages =
1 - and had no problems so far. Maybe it's because only
On 20/05/13 23:40, Gedalya wrote:
On 05/20/2013 05:13 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 20/05/13 17:12, Gedalya wrote:
On 05/20/2013 12:02 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Exim doesn't seem to have any variable expansion for the "From" field
If using the From header actually mak
On 20/05/13 17:12, Gedalya wrote:
On 05/20/2013 12:02 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Exim doesn't seem to have any variable expansion for the "From" field
If using the From header actually makes sense to you... then see
$h_ at
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/ht
On 20/05/13 16:12, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
I am trying to configure my Dovecot installation to provide
Vacation/Out-of-the-office emails using the Sieve plugin. My setup is a
little bit peculiar:
Internet Internet
I am trying to configure my Dovecot installation to provide
Vacation/Out-of-the-office emails using the Sieve plugin. My setup is a
little bit peculiar:
Internet Internet
| ^
V |
Pro
20 matches
Mail list logo
