On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:06 AM, David Favor wrote:
Yes. Be sure to check your rsync version.
As I recall the 2.x series has bugs related to this.
I had a similar problem on MacOS until I upgraded to 3.0.6 and all
is well with ':' on MacOS & Ubuntu at this level.
Robert Schetterer w
source is a debian build, share is a readynas. i've been getting
rsync: mkstemp 'filename goes here' failed: Not a directory (20)
errors. rsync is v3.0. i believe this is related to the dovecot
file
naming convention that includes characters such as ':' in the
filename. anyone else seei
i'm trying to backup the dovecot Maildir files over a cifs share.
source is a debian build, share is a readynas. i've been getting
rsync: mkstemp 'filename goes here' failed: Not a directory (20)
errors. rsync is v3.0. i believe this is related to the dovecot
file naming convention
i run my server (web, email, calendar, etc.) off a mac mini ppc.
it's a beautiful thing for our modest needs (quiet, low power,
stable), but i'm looking at switching it to a vanilla bsd. has
anyone tried dovecot on an openbsd (or similar) install for macppc?
-SM-
imap IDLE is now built into the apple mail client in Leopard
(finally!!). anyone looked at compatibility issues with dovecot?
-SM-
I'd appreciate if you'd share with me the directory structure that
you use, or would use in my situation. All mail storage will be on
the server so disk space is not an issue. I'm a bit confused
whether or not to keep the inbox separate from the other imap
structure as is the OS X default
Nope, incoming mail is still going through Fetchmail->Postfix-
>Procmail, unless there's some clever hook into the system after
Procmail gets its hands on it that I can't spot (procmail is just
set to deliver to a specified maildir folder).
Even when Dovecot isn't behaving, mail still ar
are you using the dovecot lda, or postfix, or procmail? i've been
using dovecot on a PPC mac os x box for quite some time, but had to
abandon the dovecot lda because of exactly the problems you
describe. i switched to postfix, then procmail, and have not had any
problems since.
-SM-
On
