Hey Diego,
Diego Liziero a écrit :
> 2008/10/1 Rene Luria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Dovecot dies with signal 11 (segfault) when doing some commands with a
>> specific message
> Could you post a backtrace (bt full) of the core file?
I've done that and at the end fo
Sorry for the duplicate
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Le 1 oct. 08 à 23:47, Rene Luria a écrit :
Here is a patch against 1.1.3 solving this issue
I forgot the link :)
http://www.luria.ch/9e93676668e453b739ee3e085434e086/dovecot-lib-mail.diff
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Ok, found the problem.
Here is a patch against 1.1.3 solving this issue
it comes from the "undisclosed-recipients:;" string
and incrementing ctx->parser.data going after the end of the buffer
maybe there are other issues like this one because in many other
places in message-address.c the poin
Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
>> (the problematic email is anonimized, tell-me if you need the originalone)
> #3 0x080c86e6 in message_address_parse (pool=0x8139270, data=0x813d668
> "undisclosed-recipients:;, Postkorb\" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>il.net>",
> That header looks fairly broken. But with all
e gdb backtrace:
bt.txt
test system is running debian sarge, but same thing happens with debian
etch (both x86) using xfs
always reproductible
Can you help me with this ?
(the problematic email is anonimized, tell-me if you need the originalone)
--
Rene Luria
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptogr
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> I have finally updated the MANAGESIEVE patch to fix the currently known
> small problems with the protocol implementation. Also, I included a
> proxy implementation based on imap-proxy.c. This patch is designed for
> dovecot release 1.0.2 and it will not apply cleanly to the
Stephan Bosch wrote:
>>> first of all: there's a newer version of the patch
>>> http://sinas.rename-it.nl/~sirius/dovecot-1.0.rc28-MANAGESIEVE-v4.diff.gz
>> I don't see anything about the proxy stuff in the README or NEWS
>> files... Do you plan to implement it ?
> Yes, I do plan to implement it.
Hey Joseba,
Joseba Torre wrote:
> first of all: there's a newer version of the patch
> http://sinas.rename-it.nl/~sirius/dovecot-1.0.rc28-MANAGESIEVE-v4.diff.gz
I don't see anything about the proxy stuff in the README or NEWS
files... Do you plan to implement it ?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It took almost 5 years, but it's finally ready. I'm not expecting to
> release v1.0.1 anytime soon, unless someone's been sitting on a major
> bug just waiting for v1.0 to be released. :)
Congratulations. You and all contributors have made a great job.
Scott Peron wrote:
> After looking at the LDA/Sendmail page in the dovecot wiki, I wanted to
> contribute another method to easily configure Sendmail to use deliver.
> Instead of adding a new mailer definition, as already suggested, one can
> simply use the following line in their sendmail.mc file
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bosch wrote:
> I have updated the MANAGESIEVE patch to apply and compile against
> dovecot 1.0.rc28. Not much has changed with respect to the functionality
> of the previous version however:
(...)
How can you implement this in an actual reverse-proxied environment ?
like havi
12 matches
Mail list logo
