Re: Debian package for bookworm

been published about 2.4 Cheers, Philip > On 14 Oct 2023, at 07:30, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > > Hi! > > We are not making 2.3 packages for bookworm, it will be supported by from 2.4 > forward. > > Aki > >> On 14/10/2023 00:04 EEST Philip Iezzi via

Re: Debian package for bookworm

Hi Noah Is there some update on this? Missing Dovecot package repo for Debian Bookworm holds me back from upgrading a bunch of mail servers. There's no way I would downgrade from latest 2.3.21 to official Debian dovecot packages, which currently are only at 2.3.19 or possibly 2.3.20 in the near

Re: [ext] What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?

> On 15 Mar 2021, at 14:17, Sylvhem wrote: > > Le dimanche 14 mars 2021 à 21:13 +0100, Benny Pedersen a écrit : >> On 2021-03-14 17:29, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >>> * Ralf Hildebrandt : > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any > progress > in implementing the RF

Re: dsync having problems with @-sign in mailbox names

> On 28 Sep 2019, at 11:48, Philip Iezzi via dovecot > wrote: > > >> On 28 Sep 2019, at 11:28, Sami Ketola via dovecot >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 28 Sep 2019, at 12.21, Philip Iezzi via dovecot >>> wrote: >>> >>

Re: dsync having problems with @-sign in mailbox names

> On 28 Sep 2019, at 11:28, Sami Ketola via dovecot wrote: > > > >> On 28 Sep 2019, at 12.21, Philip Iezzi via dovecot >> wrote: >> >> Hi there >> >> We are running Cyrus-to-Dovecot migrations using dsync on destination >> Doveco

dsync having problems with @-sign in mailbox names

Hi there We are running Cyrus-to-Dovecot migrations using dsync on destination Dovecot server (Debian Stretch / latest Dovecot 2.3.7.2 from community repo) like this: $ doveadm -o mail_fsync=never backup -R -u imapc: For imapc configuration to connect to remote Cyrus server, see below [1]. W

Re: Repo for Debian-Buster

Hi there, Any news about Debian Buster packages in Dovecot community repos? We would greatly appreciate! Soon going live with two rather big Dovecot servers and would prefer upgrading them to Buster before. I will definitely bow my head and look for some donation button! Thanks, Philip > On 2

Re: ACL ignored for master users

Sorry about double posting. Thought my previous post didn't make it through. Still struggling with this problem... > On 14 Aug 2019, at 15:21, Philip Iezzi wrote: > > Hi there! > > I can't get ACL working for master users. Login as master user works fine > though,

ACL ignored for master users

Hi there! I can't get ACL working for master users. Login as master user works fine though, and I am able to access any mailbox using the auth_master_user_separator "*", tested e.g. via Python's imaplib: import imaplib imap = imaplib.IMAP4_SSL('imap.example.com') imap.login('f...@example.com*ad

ACL ignored for master users

Hi there! I can't get ACL working for master users. Login as master user works fine though, and I am able to access any mailbox using the auth_master_user_separator "*", tested e.g. via Python's imaplib: >>> import imaplib >>> imap = imaplib.IMAP4_SSL('imap.example.com') >>> imap.login('f...@ex