On 02/01/2012 01:56 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 2/1/2012 1:40 PM, Papp Tamas schreef:
hi!
What does patched mean in this repo?
Does anybody know?
This is the v2.1 repository that includes unstable development patches:
http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.1-patches/
http://hg.rename-it.nl
hi!
What does patched mean in this repo?
Does anybody know?
Thank you,
tamas
On 04/30/2011 10:21 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Yes. You as admin have to deal with this. Buy a bigger disk, reduce the
quota, etc.
Or use a filesystem quota, which will (of course) only work with real
users and not with virtual users.
OK, thank you.
Well, virtual users are needed:)
tamas
On 04/30/2011 02:24 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
I mean, how I can set a true quota usage for a user?
Define "true quota usage".
Maximum usable space for a user on the disk.
The current implementation just works. Where is your problem with that?
You get the exact amount of bytes all mails of a us
On 04/30/2011 01:36 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
So, there is no exact or something closer solution with normal
maildirs?
Define "exact".
I mean, how I can set a true quota usage for a user?
Trust me, you don't want to include any meta data or filesystem overhead
in the quota value presented to
On 04/20/2011 05:26 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Papp Tamas wrote:
On 04/20/2011 01:47 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
"du" also accounts for the metadata of the filesystem. With Maildir++
you have many files per directory which causes the directory inode to
increase in size. After mails are de
On 04/20/2011 01:47 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
"du" also accounts for the metadata of the filesystem. With Maildir++
you have many files per directory which causes the directory inode to
increase in size. After mails are deleted, the now empty space inside
the directory is not reclaimed (at least no
hi!
In table I see this:
| papp.ta...@center.hu | 118671994 |20437 |
du -sm says, the size of the maildir is 154M.
I use xfs.
I can't figure out, why is there a difference.
Can you help me out?
Thank you,
tamas
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:06:42PM -0400, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:35, Papp Tamás wrote:
> > /usr/lib/dovecot/expire-tool.sh
>
> Is it a script? I'm on Ubuntu 9.10 with Dovecot 1.1.11 and there is
> no /usr/lib/dovecot/expire-tool.sh though there is a
> /usr/lib/dovecot/exp
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:07:26PM +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I think about migrate from FreeBSD to Linux because I need DRBD for
> clustering.
>
> I want to use Debian Lenny but run on some problems.
>
> I want near latest Dovecot packages. Native repos are too old. Backports
On 2010. 01. 07. 20:15, Papp Tamas wrote:
On 2010. 01. 07. 20:08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
shift+del works for me with TB 3.0 and Dovecot 1.2.9.
Could you send me a diff agains the default dovecot.conf?
I forgot to mention, do you use the plugin deleted_to_trash?
Thank you,
tamas
On 2010. 01. 07. 20:08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
shift+del works for me with TB 3.0 and Dovecot 1.2.9.
Could you send me a diff agains the default dovecot.conf?
Thank you,
tamas
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:13:56PM +0100, Papp Tamás wrote:
>
> hi Aiko,
>
> Thanks for the quick answer and I'm sorry for the late. Yes, this was
> the problemm it's solved, but still not everything is cool.
>
> I think, I tried everything and now I'm out of clue.
>
> If I press DEL with cour
Papp Tamas wrote:
Tobias wrote:
yes I would try with another MUA just to verify whether it's a MUA- or
server problem.
Well as I wrote, it will be hard, but I'll do it. Until I cannot, do
you have any other idea?
BTW, I think we can be pretty sure, it's not a MUA prob
Tobias wrote:
yes I would try with another MUA just to verify whether it's a MUA- or
server problem.
Well as I wrote, it will be hard, but I'll do it. Until I cannot, do you
have any other idea?
Btw: No chance to persuade the user to use IMAP instead of POP3?
No there is no chance
Tobias wrote:
Is that a problem with other MUAs too? Or is Outlook the only affected one?
You tried Thunderbird or Windows Live Mail to verify?
No, the users are using only Outlook. Should I try it with TB? It would
be a bit hard, because the failure does not depend on anything, I don't
hi All,
I have a srange problem.
Before dovecot there was a courier imap and it worked just fine. The
client(s) are the same then before, so I think, this is an server side
problem.
I have a user with Outlook and he uses pop3 and leaves messages on server.
Sometimes the messages get downl
17 matches
Mail list logo
