On 24/11/2024 22:03, Marc via dovecot wrote:
But now you are like ms/google/letsencrypt. We decide how you should
setup your servers, we decide how you setup your dns, we decide you are
not allowed to block the amazon cloud etc.
WTF drugs are you on, my organisation my rules.
and who said an
On 23/11/2024 20:18, Marc via dovecot wrote:
?
Your provider is using this to estimate if a party is spam and block
your email. I prefer a system where you actually block someone for
having send spam. Since I am not sending newsletters or so and this
infrastructure I use is low volume, noth
On 23/11/2024 12:05, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 11/22/24 21:02, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: This isn't exactly
on-topic, but does anyone know of any mailing lists for mail admins,
for discussion of deliverability (not the "bulk mailing" kind!),
Google's awful behavior, etc?
On 23/11/2024 11:34, Dave McGuire via dovecot wrote:
there are still quite a few 'my family member is so good with computers
integrators' that tell their clients they it is ok to use an ip that
does not even match spf.
I know what ya sayin :) but what's worse, is there are too many actual
p
On 22/11/2024 20:18, Marc via dovecot wrote:
Microsft outlook and Google Gmail hosts most spammers on the Planet
Earth.
Nah, the worst offenders are OVH and Contabo, followed by digital
sewer,
then gmail :)
If you make spf -all for gmail that helps a lot. However there are still
quite a few
On 22/11/2024 23:33, Marc via dovecot wrote:
ps. I think these guys have had their best times https://zonecheck.org/
not really up to date info
?
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 22/11/2024 20:04, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote:
On 18/11/2024 21:52, Marc via dovecot wrote:
Sorry for being off topic, but why are you deciding to move to
dovecot? I have the impression the trend is that everyone is moving to
google/outlook?
In June 2023, we ran a poll, below is
On 19/11/2024 08:07, The Doctor via dovecot wrote:
Microsft outlook and Google Gmail hosts most spammers on the Planet
Earth.
Nah, the worst offenders are OVH and Contabo, followed by digital sewer,
then gmail :)
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
___
doveco
On 18/11/2024 21:52, Marc via dovecot wrote:
Sorry for being off topic, but why are you deciding to move to dovecot?
I have the impression the trend is that everyone is moving to
google/outlook?
In June 2023, we ran a poll, below is results of primary use of email,
the requirement was imap/p
Benny, go take your meds
On 27/10/2024 03:32, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote:
Nick Howitt via dovecot skrev den 2024-10-26 18:57:
Because webmin didn't set it? Looking at the docs:
last_valid_uid
Default: 0
Values: Unsigned integer
This setting and first_valid_uid specify the valid UID
On 01/06/2024 20:23, Adam Miller via dovecot wrote:
Thank you!
At the time, I was trying to get the most basic of quotas working which
I have now successfully accomplished! I am happy report that I also
have the warning emails working.
Excellent.
Is it possible that instead of a bash scrip
On 30/05/2024 20:06, Adam Miller via dovecot wrote:
however now I am having an issue trying to get the quota warning emails
to work.
Your original post did not show a "service quota-warning" section where
you tell dovecot what to run, I suggest you fully read everything to do
with quota on t
Hi Barbara,
On 14/12/2023 00:08, Barbara M. wrote:
passdb {
args = /etc/dovecot/master-users
driver = passwd-file
master = yes
result_success = continue
}
try replacing result_success with
pass = yes
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
___
On 18/09/2023 16:17, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Aki, any ideas? Or have I have hit a ridiculously low 1000D hard coded
limit?
...and I know some troll will comment, so let me say yes I know I can
and will likely have to use nix's "find" to actually cull them, but if
doveadm has an expunge op
In my boredom, I was cleaning up my own public mailbox, do I really need
lists/newsletters/forums posts from the 90's .. I think not, but lets
still keep 5 years and expunge the rest... or try to... but expunge
doesnt want too...
This error or lack of action, occurs on any mailbox, as an examp
On 26/07/2023 22:43, Marc wrote:
A dns query for imap.web.de address records (IN A) returns two ip
addresses.
And I'm betting each IP is a hardware load balancer with crap load of
servers behind each :)
I am converting a bit to containers and there are so many applications
that are not able
On 20/07/2023 05:55, Gerald Galster wrote:
A dns query for imap.web.de address records (IN A) returns two ip
addresses.
And I'm betting each IP is a hardware load balancer with crap load of
servers behind each :)
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legall
(I'm very late to this party so my comments may have been said at some
point)
On 20/07/2023 03:53, Michael Peddemors wrote:
Real world is a bit different.. DNS Caching.. While DNS Round Robin is
good enough to distribute loads, it isnt' a very good method for
failover, even with a very short
On 05/06/2023 20:52, Eirik Rye wrote:
On 05/06/2023 11:14, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote:
[...]
Both of you should grow up and keep this argument outside the mailing
list.
yes mum___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe
On 23/05/2023 17:23, Marc wrote:
there is a reason these things cost more than you'll earn in a year.
second post in a row showing your lack of knowledge in actual networks,
before you make an even bigger ass out of yourself, how about getting
some experience in the real world or spending some
On 11/02/2019 09:48, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote:
> On 2/10/19 3:46 PM, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote: On 2/10/19 3:42 PM,
> Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via
> dovecot wrote:
>
> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by l
On 11/02/2019 09:46, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote:
However the majority of spammers do not spam with a properly configured
Reverse DNS - so detect the list header >and skip DMARC if list headers
are present AND Reverse DNS matched the HELO/EHLO
A hell of a lot do, though (this i
On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote:
> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and opendmarc
> not reject detected maillist will be solution,
A general broad mailing list whitelist will be problematic, do work it
needs to look for specific list type hidden
On 10/02/2019 07:38, Ralph Seichter via dovecot wrote:
> * Juri Haberland via dovecot:
>
>> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences
>> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving
>> participants.
>
> Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? N
24 matches
Mail list logo
