d I'm actually hoping to get rid of all traces of BDB code in
Dovecot. I just don't seem to have the skills to make it work reliably.
What's the problem with that, which versions of BDB have you used, and
what's the reliability issue with BDB?
--
Matthias Andree
Charles Marcus schrieb:
> On 9/21/2009 11:33 AM, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
>>> Of course, eventually I'm sure dovecot will hit a wall where performance
>>> improvements will be negligible, but for now, the difference between the
>>> 1.0.x version and 1.2.x is so great that anyone who refuses to upg
Am 18.09.2009, 22:32 Uhr, schrieb Noel Butler :
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:56 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
No\"{e}l, I don't think such findings belong here.
Ubuntu 8.04 is a long-term support release (desktop three years, server
five
years), and it's natural that user
Am 18.09.2009, 16:57 Uhr, schrieb Charles Marcus
:
On 9/18/2009, Matthias Andree (matthias.and...@gmx.de) wrote:
Ubuntu 8.04 is a long-term support release (desktop three years, server
five
years), and it's natural that users will use that.
It is also natural that critical servers s
Noel Butler schrieb:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 06:12 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> On 9/18/2009, Gabriele (listarolo_dove...@musimac.it) wrote:
>>> dovecot 1.0.10
>> This is really old... it is very likely that upgrading dovecot to a more
>> current build - either 1.1.19, or better, 1.2.5 - will
Am 27.08.2009, 10:28 Uhr, schrieb Δημήτριος Καραπιπέρης
:
Hi Timo
what do u exactly mean "dirrefentIPs"?
Requests coming to differentIPs?
or Certs bound to two different server IPs?
That would be run two instances, each on a different Listen Address.
--
Matthias Andree
Charles Marcus schrieb:
> On 7/29/2009, Steffen Kaiser (skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de) wrote:
>> Do you have a Cisco Firewall/IDS or a software firewall running
>> between your client and Dovecot? If so, try to disable it for a test.
>>
>> Some firewalls don't understand that after STARTTLS they ha
Am 07.07.2009, 21:02 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Andree :
# HG changeset patch
# User Matthias Andree
# Date 1246993296 -7200
# Branch HEAD
# Node ID c884491cb1a61ef50e227fcf4bb77d2e449c1e3a
# Parent dff7312629a72f6ee90ab470ad0d50dfa68e6f71
Fix VPATH build of RQUOTA support.
This applies to
# HG changeset patch
# User Matthias Andree
# Date 1246993296 -7200
# Branch HEAD
# Node ID c884491cb1a61ef50e227fcf4bb77d2e449c1e3a
# Parent dff7312629a72f6ee90ab470ad0d50dfa68e6f71
Fix VPATH build of RQUOTA support.
Some rpcgen derive #include "..." paths from the infile argument.
cleaner interfaces, much
better error handling and an easier-to-read syntax. =>
http://www.courier-mta.org/maildrop/
--
Matthias Andree
t about two dovecots on two servers with Maildirs on NFS?
It basically means "don't change cur/ contents behind Dovecot's back, else
it won't notice".
Two dovecots on two servers accessing *the same* Maildir/cur/ would be
just that.
--
Matthias Andree
Nicolas KOWALSKI schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> About the INBOX location when using maildir, in the wiki,
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir, I can read:
>
> "
> Directory Structure
>
> ~/Maildir/new, ~/Maildir/cur and ~/Maildir/tmp directories contain
> the messages for INBOX. The tmp dir
plain out of date.
No, it is not - it pertains to the latest official qmail release (which is
over a decade old BTW). Feel free to send a patch that weaves info about
netqmail 1.06 in. I'm not doing that.
--
Matthias Andree
the qmail list (but be prepared for crusades on the list...
BTST).
As a pointer, check the various qmail examples on how procmail can be
integrated into qmail and see if those can be adjusted for deliver.
--
Matthias Andree
Rick Romero schrieb:
>
> On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:56 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Tim Traver wrote:
>>
>>> ok, after looking at all of the posts that I've found, and trying
>>> numerous settings, I am a little stumped as to how to
systems should implement copy-on-write strategies
underneath fork() and can then map vfork() on top of fork() because it
really makes no noticable difference any more.
--
Matthias Andree
-user file for
> that particular user to avoid the extra step.
...are home directory lookups so very expensive on your system? Hard to
believe. I always found that qmail's (and qmail-send's) queue spooling
behaviour was what really hurted, with a dozen (or so) synchronous
writes for just
y try ident queries that your client
possibly firewalls) or Postfix.
> why is this so slow?
> any chance to speed up this ?
Figure out what takes so long (Wireshark or tcpdump) - do not only log
Dovecot queries.
--
Matthias Andree
.org/FILTER_README.html#simple_filter>
Postfix's content_filter=... setting diverts the mail from regular
routing, and the sendmail command (without -t!) reinjects with original
headers and recipients (from envelope) for then regular routing.
Looks scary to some, but works.
BTDT, although I've moved on to amavisd-new since. Saves the hassle of
training spamfilters with virucide fodder...
--
Matthias Andree
t.
Postfix's pipe(8) transport runs the command directly rather than
spawning /bin/sh; so it does not support shell expansions such as pipes.
--
Matthias Andree
particular folders via IMAP.
I'm happy to update or add instructions to bogofilter, but may not have
the time to do sufficient R&D myself in the near future to obtain
relevant knowledge that I could document myself.
--
Matthias Andree
It was in the release notes and supposed to go away upon first
successful authentication.
--
Matthias Andree
ED] ~]$ fetchmail -vvv
> fetchmail: 6.3.6 querying coreteamsolutions.in (protocol POP3) at Sat 23 Aug
Seriously outdated. Does it have all the security fixes?
--
Matthias Andree
on.
>
> Or before when dialups were more common, if the modem disconnected you'd
> have to wait several minutes until the previous connection timed out.
Which would hint to signal propagation issues on the dialin server.
Modems detect quite quickly if the link is broken and the system can
then issue SIGHUP and clean up locks...
--
Matthias Andree
Hi
I hope you're not offended by posting a quote to the list...
you sent the mail just to me.
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here here is an excerpt:
>
> ls -l home/matthew/Maildir/cur
>
...
> drwx-- 2 matthew matthew 512 Jul 30 17:48 cur:2,ST
> drwx-- 2 matthew
tents into the right place, and check if the mail
filtering/delivery rules designate the proper places to drop mail off.
--
Matthias Andree
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Well... according to RFC-1939, the session should be locked when
> entering TRANSACTION state. Purpose is to avoid two processes stomping
> over each other in the later UPDATE state.
setting pop3_lock_session=yes works as expected (ca. 1.1.
nce I don't really have the option
> of upgrading the OS on my mail servers any time soon.
I'd stay away from such a version, but use a recent 1.0.X or 1.1.X - if
someone is looking after your server regularly (once or twice a week or
so), compiling it yourself shouldn't be an issue.
HTH
--
Matthias Andree
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008, Curtis Maloney wrote:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>>> - proxy: Login success reply was sent in two IP packets, which
>>> confused some IMAP/POP3 clients
>>
>> So? Fix the
27;m not against the change, but it's not a "solution".
--
Matthias Andree
fter all, is highly popular in qmail
environments which boast about their "security" (which is partially
based on "proof by claim" like arguments and sometimes 'substantiated'
by ad-hominem attacks of certain groups of people who can't bear
criticism).
--
Matthias Andree
inked ps, top, netstat copies
from an uncompromised system or a known-good live CD?
--
Matthias Andree
Steffen Kaiser schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I've put together an always tempfail & sendmail-like DSN report back patch.
>
> Because I don't know how to transform the rejection reason into
> sysexit.h codes, it always tempfails.
Just read /usr/include/sysexits.h and pick the best fit, such as
EX_NOPERM.
Steffen Kaiser schrieb:
> BTW: Would it be possible to return the errno of the failed system call
> to the MTA via the main() return value? I believe that any MTA will act
> upon these codes and the postmaster can setup the preferred way handling
> bounces.
No, the "any" MTA - excluding qmail and
Matt Zukowski schrieb:
> Just wondering if anyone out there is working on a package for openSUSE
> 10.2?
Already there, check
http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/mail/openSUSE_10.2/
(look in the subdirectory of your architecture).
--
Matthias Andree
James Turnbull schrieb:
> Hi all
>
> It's morning and I haven't had coffee but has anyone else noticed that
> the Wiki seems to have changed languages from English to Russian in
> sections?
>
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/FrontPage
>
> It appears a user has made some edits to a couple of the pages a
Phillip T. George schrieb:
> Here's a snippet from the procmail log file:
> procmail: Assigning
> "LASTFOLDER=/home/domain.com/homes/user/Maildir/new/1176426436.9170_1.east.domain.com"
>
> procmail: Notified comsat:
> "[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]:/home/domain.com/homes/user/Maildir/new/1176426436.9170_1
Stewart Dean schrieb:
> When this happens with sendmail, it can be that the queue handler
> doesn't finish before a new queue handler is kicked off, so each
> successive queue handler/runner ends up sending the same mail.
> Background: sendmail, and perhaps postfix, is configured to a) toss
> stuff
Marc Perkel schrieb:
> Remember even if you don't get everything right by tomorrow there's
> always version 1.01. There will always be bugs and new features to add.
I do hope Timo will leave bugs and features to the HEAD branch and save
the fixes for 1.0.X :-) [1]
Anyways, to Timo - good luck wit
mail being in the wrong folder. Particularly the "fallthrough" behavior
of procmail's is complemented by EX_TEMPFAIL in maildrop.
Best,
Matthias Andree
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to figure out how to get dovecot to startup at boot. I saw the
> Ubuntu script on the dovecot site, but that didn't work on my system (SuSe
> 10.2). Of course, copying the /usr/local/sbin/dovecot file into
> /etc/init.d doesn't work at all. Any one h
m 0.99
to 1.0 the configuration file format changed, or something like that).
So I still have some sympathy for Timo's many release candidates. I'd
rather he called a broken release "RC" rather than have showstoppers in
the actual release :-)
Features aren't good in rc though. But let's wait how 1.0 looks before
we complain :-)
--
Matthias Andree
r for pkgsrc) is that the example
> config file changes with (almost) every release. The changes are mostly
> just in comments, but it makes users have to merge their configuration on
> every update.
In the end, Dovecot has not yet been released...
--
Matthias Andree
Biffy Bob schrieb:
> Hello everyone,
> I am getting an error message on FreeBSD 4 after I install dovecot. To
> start off, I create two regular users, testuser and testuser1.
>
> I send each user emails then I install dovecot. After installing
> dovecot I set up the users in Maildir format then
Ejay Hire schrieb:
> I support A. If I get a package from an RPM repository and the version
> number is 1.3, I will think it is better than 1.2.
>
> If I get a package from an RPM repository and the version number is
> 1.3.unstable, I am smart enough to know that it might be "unstable".
No offe
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
>
> With a) style the releases
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> I'll probably release 1.0.rc28 in a few days. Would be nice to get some
> testing for it first. http://dovecot.org/nightly/dovecot-latest.tar.gz
> contains pretty much what it's supposed to be.
Are we now seeing prereleases to release candidates? Wow, that is really
nasty.
Marc Lucke schrieb:
> dovecot-1.0-1.1.rc15.fc6
>
> When I attempt to drag spam from one IMAP box to another it tells me
> that I have an invalid mbox format for some emails. Occasionally too
> when I click on that email box it gives me the same error. uw-imapd
> never gave me those problems.
Yo
48 matches
Mail list logo
