On 9/15/2024 10:54 PM, Reprobus via dovecot wrote:
RAPTOR REMARK: Alert! Please be careful! This email is from an
EXTERNAL sender. Be aware of impersonation and credential theft.
Hi, I'm in a situation whereas I need to backup my email from an IMAP
server to a POP3 email client of my choosing.
On 5/6/2022 3:53 AM, Philipp Ewald wrote:
we have a strange problem.
Costumer use Outlook to connect to our IMAP and SMTP Server.
While sending Mails Outlooks reports connection lost. In Mail log
there is no reason logged or something else.
What i dont understand is that IMAP lose connetion
On 1/12/2022 12:14 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
--2022-01-12 00:10:41--https://www.dovecot.org/tmp/wiki2-export.tar.gz
Resolvingwww.dovecot.org (www.dovecot.org)... 94.237.12.234,
2a04:3545:1000:720:acc1:5bff:fe5e:4e9
Connecting towww.dovecot.org (www.dovecot.org)|94.237.12.234|:443...
connected.
Ope
tps://www.pccc.com/>
RaptorLogo <https://raptoremailsecurity.com/>
*Kevin A. McGrail
* /CEO Emeritus
/ *Peregrine Computer Consultants Corporation
*
Phone +1.703.798.0171 email
kmcgr...@pccc.com
Globe
www.pccc.comGlobe
www.raptoremailsecurity.co
On 5/7/2020 12:56 PM, Asai wrote:
> That makes sense. So you're saying that very large inboxes are
> generally bad for mobile devices? How are they bad for the servers?
I'm saying that large inboxes can be generally bad for MUAs including
mobile and desktop. Their just downloading and constant
On 5/7/2020 12:43 PM, Asai wrote:
> Thanks for your response,
>
> So, how do those rotation scripts work in concept?
>
> People are still able to access their old inboxes, but it just moves
> them to an archived state?
We rotate the folder to another name with the date like INBOX-2020-05-07
with i
On 5/7/2020 11:39 AM, Asai wrote:
> What's a reasonable inbox size? Is 20+ GB reasonable and nothing to
> worry about?
>
Great question.
At my firm, we wrote rotation tools that work for mbox format to rotate
inboxes monthly if they are over a certain size. We also do the sent
items folders.
We
On 3/28/2019 10:40 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> check for fts in mail_plugins. pop3-uidl is used by pop3_migration
> plugin.
Sorry if I'm dense but can you be more specific? Are you talking about
checking conf files or binary files?
For example, does the existence of
/usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib20_ft
On 3/28/2019 7:42 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> olution:
> Operators should update to the latest Patch Release. The only workaround
> is to disable FTS and pop3-uidl plugin.
Hi Aki, thanks for the CVE. For quick mitigation, can you confirm how
to disable these plugins and what they provide?
Timo,
Thanks, this patch works fine as well.
Regards,
KAM
- Original Message -
From: "Timo Sirainen"
Anyway, did a cleaner fix:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/2c7111b2b0d0
I'll admit that I'm out of my league on this. It does compile with this
change I made but I may not be within the standard for the same reason.
Here's the items I was reading about the issue:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-02/msg01874.html
But to be clear, what I was trying to do was g
I'm throwing an error compiling with a custom-compiled gcc 3.2.3 on one box.
The configuration string is CC=/usr/local/gcc3.2.3/bin/gcc
CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/ssl/include LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/ssl/lib ./configure
--with-ssl=openssl --with-ssldir=/usr/local/ssl/certs --with-pam --with-pop3d
--sysc
The docs at http://wiki.dovecot.org/MainConfig?highlight=%28ssl_listen%29
aren't clear but I was wondering if I can have IMAP listening on port 143
and port 144, for example, on the same machine?
Regards,
KAM
r box
installed in 2001 has a "problem" when everything is working "fine"?
Plus it annoys Timo and that's just an extra bonus ;-)
regards,
KAM
- Original Message -
From: "Asheesh Laroia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dovecot Mailing List"
Cc
mall array
size changes were needed.
Regards,
KAM
- Original Message -
From: "Sven Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is included in my patch already, but Timo didn't want to commit it,
since [0] is gcc specific, and [] is C99 standard.
Kevin A. McGrail schrieb:
As a follow-up on this, these two lines also helped me to compile the 1.1rc1
on gcc 2.96:
diff -ru dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib/str-find.c
dovecot-1.1.beta13.patched/src/lib/str-find.c
--- dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib/str-find.c Tue Oct 23 16:01:16 2007
+++ dovecot-1.1.beta13.patched/src/lib
Timo,
I continue to deal with this issue where the MIME Boundary appears on the
bottom of the email and it is still happening as of Dovecot 1.0.5.
Unfortunately, it continues to happen to me ONLY with one email box that I
have seen and, of course, the email box has sensitive data in it.
I ha
Possible Caching Bug showing up as a MIME Boundary Issue
I'm using Dovecot version 1.0.0. I was using Dovecot version 1.0.0 beta3 or
alpha4. I upgraded to Dovecot 1.0.0 to make sure that was not the issue.
Over the past few weeks on a server running a stable dovecot, I have seem a few
e
18 matches
Mail list logo
