On 11/04/2021 01:04, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2021, at 12:57, Juri Haberland wrote:
>> On 10/04/2021 19:52, @lbutlr wrote:
>>> On 10 Apr 2021, at 09:55, B Shea wrote:
>>>> OpenSSL (Ubuntu default/repo version): 1.1.1f 31 Mar 2020
>>>
>>> There
On 10/04/2021 19:52, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2021, at 09:55, B Shea wrote:
>> OpenSSL (Ubuntu default/repo version): 1.1.1f 31 Mar 2020
>
> There have been a few critical patches to open SSL in the last year,
> including a very important one to 1.1.1k just recently.
>
> Not to do with your
On 09.03.21 17:00, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> ARC test can be skipped if ORIGINATING dkim signed DKIM signature gives
> PASS
>
> your mail here gives DKIM PASS in perl Mail::DKIM
>
> but
>
> ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=dovecot.org;
> s=arc; t=1615272934;
>
On 08.03.21 11:38, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-03-08 10:34, Juri Haberland wrote:
> checked your dkim signing, it have signed 2 Date headers, 2 From, 2
> Subject, solve this :=)
Benny, it's not about *my* DKIM signature. And it is perfectly legal and
has a special purpose
On 08.03.21 07:43, Ángel L. Mateo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problems with some emails from the list, been classified as
> SPAM in my system because of DMARC failures. I'm not sure but this may
> be a problem with the list configuration.
>
>
> I attach the log for the failures
On 04/01/2021 13:02, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> We are pleased to release v2.3.13. Please find it from locations below:
>
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.13.tar.gz
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.13.tar.gz.sig
> Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
> Docker images in
On 04/01/2021 13:02, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> We are pleased to release v2.3.13. Please find it from locations below:
> Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
Hi Aki,
is it on purpose that there is no build for Ubuntu Xenial 16.04 or is it
just an oversight?
Kind regards,
Juri
On 28/12/2020 09:44, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Am 27.12.2020 um 16:11 schrieb Juri Haberland:
>> I can't help you with your performance problem, but for Thunderbird to
>> check all folders, you need to set "mail.check_all_imap_folders_for_new"
>> to 'true&
On 27/12/2020 15:11, ml_dove...@thorsten-reichelt.de wrote:
> And it seems that some folders are never updated in TB. In example I
> sort all messages from this list into a "INBOX.Mailinglists.ML-Dovecot"
> subfolder by using a simple sieve rule. But even after 10 minutes TB
> thinks that there ar
On 19.04.20 23:44, David Mehler wrote:
> I'm using Dovecot 2.2, Postfix 3.5, and am atempting to get the latest
> version of Thunderbird to work. I tried account autoconfig which did
> not work, so I had to manually enter information and correct other
> information. On my server dovecot supports pl
On 02/04/2020 15:18, Adam Raszkiewicz wrote:
> Desired flow looks like:
>
> Dovecot -> Postfix --> Relay Server -┐
> Dovecot <-- LMTP/LDA <-- Postfix <-┘
This mail flow cannot work with one Postfix instance. Either Postfix
knows that "localdomain.com" is lo
On 15/03/2020 21:26, GMX Account wrote:
> have a look at this:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter
>
> [...]When the recipient_delimiter [1] set contains multiple characters
> (Postfix 2.11 and later), a user name or .forward file name is
> separated from its extension
On 15/03/2020 20:26, Peter wrote:
> Poorly documented, imo, but you want lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes:
Thanks, tried it, but no, that's not what I want and it doesn't help in my case.
To recap:
If I set recipient_delimiter to "+-" (or "-" alone), having a user named
"foo-bar" won't work any
On 12/03/2020 08:04, Jean-Daniel wrote:
>
>
>> Le 11 mars 2020 à 19:32, Juri Haberland a écrit :
>>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames.
>> Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+
Hi list,
I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames.
Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both
Postfix and Dovecot (using lmtp) and now any user that have a '-' in it's
username can't receive mail anymore, because lmtp truncates the localpar
On 04/09/2019 15:26, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
> A lot of mail that is not spam when it arrives WILL be spam when it is
> forwarded as it will fail SPF, Fail DKIM, and any header checks will flag the
> mail as suspicious.
>
> The only way to safely forward mail is to enclose it as an attachmen
On 09/02/2019 20:13, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote:
> On 2/9/19 10:48 AM, Juri Haberland via dovecot wrote:
>> Most people use OpenDMARC and there are patches to mark certain hosts as
>> mailing lists senders, so it is possible.
>
> can you please let me know where
On 09/02/2019 19:56, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
>> On 09 February 2019 at 20:48 Juri Haberland via dovecot <
>> dovecot@dovecot.org
>> <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> wrote:
>> Most people use OpenDMARC and there are patches to mark certain hosts as
>>
On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy
> ;(
>
> It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again.
I'd say, let Mailman throw all people off the list that have enabled DMARC
checking without using exc
On 22/07/18 16:35, arthurjohns...@verizon.net wrote:
> Remember to restart your webserver.
>
> The following is my hook for Certbot in Apache.
>
> ==
> #!/bin/sh
> service postfix restart
> service dovecot restart
> service apache2 restart
> =
A "p
On 2018-01-16 06:23, Daniel Miller wrote:
I get about a half dozen rejection messages from various servers when
I post to this list. Is there something I need to configure
differently in my DMARC record to be better compliant?
What about adding a DKIM signature to your outgoing mails before
e
On 24.08.2017 21:05, Ivan Warren wrote:
> In the same vein,
>
> I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org.
> It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the
> the of a DMARC report) pass...
>
> Here is what I am getting :
> Authentication-Results: mx01.n
On 09.02.2017 12:13, Steven Mainor wrote:
> Well for other mailing lists I have noticed that a lot of lists add text to
> the body or subject saying what list the email is from which would cause the
> signature not to match.
>
> But the dovecot list doesn't do that so that's why I found it stran
On 06.02.2017 23:39, Steven Mainor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that I get several emails a week from this list in my spam
> folder. Usually because the DKIM signature fails. Has anyone else
> noticed this problem or is it just me?
No, it's not just you. There are some people that have a DMARC po
On 23.04.2016 20:27, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andrew,
> I've got an issue with the latest Thunderbird, although I'm not sure
> this is when the problem started (version 45.0) it has an add-on
> "mailredirect (version 0.8.7)".
>
> In the past I've been able to redirect mail (bounce them)
25 matches
Mail list logo
