see if your storage
system can do compression. For example, I have dovecot store all mail
uncompressed but have zfs transparently compress everything with lz4.
(Maybe one day I'll switch it to zstd.)
Jeff.
>
> Regards.
>
> On 6/28/21 13:42, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrot
l vmail 853M Jun 25 17:25 mBoX-MeSsAgEs.zstd
> What am I doing wrong?
Hm. It is possible that it just doesn't work. mbox doesn't get a lot of
attention these days - its support is more of a migration tool.
Out of curiosity, why do you use mbox? In your earlier email you said that
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:35:24 +0100, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Our archive namespace is kept in MBOX format with Maildir++ layout due to:
>
> * Need to have the email from all users/folders self contained (our
> base namespace uses MDBOX with single instance storage of a
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 15:36:22 +, Marco Usai wrote:
>Il mercoledì 9 giugno 2021, 13:37:51 CEST, Aki Tuomi
> ha scritto:
>
> Maildir and mdbox have different directory structure. You cannot get them to
> be identical.
>
> Aki
> Yes I know, but the directory structure of the two paste
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:37:15 +, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS]
wrote:
> I am struggling to update a very old set of mail servers.
> Some are supposed to be relays (MTAs by my understanding) while others are
> where the mailboxes live (MDA)
>
> In rebuilding the MDA servers, is postfi
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:26:14 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 09:07:28 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:46 AM Christian Ehrhardt
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:21 PM Josef 'Jeff&
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 09:07:28 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:46 AM Christian Ehrhardt
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:21 PM Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
> > wrote:
...
> > > The culprit seems to be LTO. If you disable LTO, e
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 13:34:54 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 17:53:27 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the recent Ubuntu (re)builds uncovered an issue with dovecot
> > 1:2.3.13+dfsg1-1
> > build log:
> &g
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 17:53:27 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> the recent Ubuntu (re)builds uncovered an issue with dovecot 1:2.3.13+dfsg1-1
> build log:
> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/529849650/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-amd64.dovecot_1%3A2.3.13+dfsg1-1build1_BUILDING.txt.gz
> A coworke
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 14:07:06 -0500, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Ok, just a quick update. I managed to reproduce it. I'll try to figure out
> where things went wrong.
Two more questions:
(1) Why are you using a UNION in your SQL statement?
(2) Does the crash still hap
Ok, just a quick update. I managed to reproduce it. I'll try to figure out
where things went wrong.
Thanks,
Jeff.
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 18:22:03 +0100, Harald Leithner wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 06.01.2021 um 18:08 schrieb Josef 'Jeff' Sipek:
> > On Wed, Jan 06,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 17:13:05 +0100, Harald Leithner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a problem upgrading Dovecot from 2.2 to 2.3.13 on one server it
> seems one user triggers a segfault while trying to authenticate.
>
> The user works fine with 2.2.36.4, our last update try mid-late 2020 was
> abor
ll' in gdb on the core file)?
Jeff.
> On Wednesday, 02/09/2020 at 15:34 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 15:07:37 -0400, Scott Q. wrote:
> > Sorry to bump up an old thread.
> >
> > 2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the err
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:04:20 +, Daan van Gorkum wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks again for your insights. I understand that a lot of features are
> pending and it's totally fine, we're just very eager to use all these
> features.
I completely forgot that the work to add those fields was done
7;t in the 2.3.11.3 tarball. It isn't even on
master. Those two files haven't been touched since January.
Jeff.
> Anything else we could try ?
>
> Scott
>
> On Wednesday, 19/08/2020 at 11:37 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:08:06 +, Daan van Gorkum wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
> Regarding grouping by remote address, I understand and for now I'll keep a
> close eye. Maybe it's an option to group by /24 for ipv4 and /64 for IPv6?
Hrm, interesting idea. But the answer
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 17:11:04 +0200, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote:
> Hi,
>
> last friday I upgraded from dovecot-2.3.10.1_2 to dovecot-2.3.11.3 (FreeBSD).
>
> Since then, I started having some issues with some customers.
>
> The log I see is like:
>
> pop3-login: Disconnected (tried to us
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 00:31:36 +, Daan van Gorkum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently we upgraded to Dovecot 2.3.11.3 and configured an example metric
> like this:
>
>
> metric imap_command {
> event_name = imap_command_finished
> group_by = cmd_name tagged_reply_state user remote_ip
Grouping b
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 15:59:59 +0200, Marc Roos wrote:
>
>
>
> FYI, I am building on alpine 3.10 and 3.11 I am getting this build[1]
> error.
That's the header file. Where is it getting included from? Is it C++ by
any chance?
> I think these header files of dovecot are not correct. Or ar
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the upgrade to Dovecot 2.3.11.3, from 2.3.10.1, I see frequently
> these errors from different users:
It looks like this has been around for a while and you just got unlucky and
started seeing this now. Here's a quick
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 21:16:42 +0200, Arjen de Korte wrote:
> Citeren Timo Sirainen :
> > !include_try ssl-keys.conf
>
> That will only work to include an optional configuration file and
> suppress errors if it doesn't exist. I put
>
> ssl_key =
> in a separate configuration file and it fai
Original Message -----
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:43:12 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 20:24:13 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote:
> > ...
> > > Thanks for the report. I reproduced it locally, but I'm not sure wh
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:43:12 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 20:24:13 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote:
...
> Thanks for the report. I reproduced it locally, but I'm not sure what is
> causing it yet.
Alright, it is actually a parsing bug.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 20:24:13 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm Tachibana.
> Additionally, I found below:
>
> dovecot/src/plugins/fts/fts-build-mail.c:
>
> 187 i_debug("@ befor address
> parse:%s",hdr->full_value);
> 188
> 189 addr
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 12:32:18 +0200, Binarus wrote:
...
> ./mail/inbox
> ./mail/.imap
> ./mail/.imap/dovecot-uidvalidity
> ./mail/.imap/dovecot.list.index.log
> ./mail/.imap/dovecot-uidvalidity.5edce848
> ./mail/.imap/INBOX
> ./mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log
> ./mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.inde
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 18:41:45 +0100, Pascal Christen wrote:
> Thanks, build passed on FreeBSD 11.3
It turns out I had a typo in the patch I posted on the mailing list. I
corrected the typo and it builds fine on 12.1.
Jeff.
-#ifdef EAI_ADDRFAIMILY /* Obsoleted by RFC 2553bis-02 */
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 12:19:35 -0500, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via dovecot wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 18:06:58 +0100, Pascal Christen via dovecot wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I've just tried to build the latest Dovecot 2.3.9 on FreeBSD 11.3.
> > Without succes
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 18:06:58 +0100, Pascal Christen via dovecot wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just tried to build the latest Dovecot 2.3.9 on FreeBSD 11.3.
> Without success...It fails on the following commit which was introduced
> in 2.3.9:
> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c85f1bc3ce612c736c9d
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 14:45:31 +0200, Jakob Curdes via dovecot wrote:
> Hello, I had to restore a mailserver from a backup to replace a system
> with problems that is still live. I did a 1:1 restore as far as possible
> from a backup, then rsynced the /var/vmail/ directory, where we have all
>
ck to you
> >
> > For the point 4, this is random. FTS backend (xapian, lucene, solr,
> > whatever..) returns X, then dovecot core choose to select only Y emails.
> > THis is a clear bug.
> >
> > On 2019-04-05 20:08, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek via dovecot wr
er search usually does not care
> about fts plugin (even with fts_enforced) and rely on some internal
> search , which si total non-sense
You're right, that doesn't seem to make sense. Can you provide a test case?
Jeff.
> Let me know how can I help on thos 4 points
>
s-xapian)
Ok, good to know.
> 2 - the body/text loop has appeared recently (maybe during the month of
> March)
Our testing doesn't seem to be able to reproduce this. Can you try to
git-bisect this to find which commit broke it?
Thanks,
Jeff.
>
> On 2019-04-05 16:36, Josef
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 19:02:52 +0800, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote:
> issue seems in the Git version :
Which git revision?
Before you updated to the broken revision, which revision/version were you
running?
Can you try it with 5f6e39c50ec79ba8847b2fdb571a9152c71cd1b6 (the commit
just before
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:42:16 +0100, James wrote:
> On 25/09/2018 22:39, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
> > Something mightily weird is going on at your end. It doesn't fail here
> > (see below). First of all, what is your configuration (output from
> > `dovecot -n`)?
>
> You have dovecot.conf but...
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:46:20 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 13:15:31 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > On 13:05 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > > On 11:31 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> >
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 13:15:31 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> On 13:05 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > On 11:31 Tue 27 Mar , Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> > It turns out there's a missing byte-inversion when loading the blocks
> > which should be addressed in get
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 15:57:01 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
...
> I'd be happy to test the patch, thanks!
Ok, try the attached patch. (It is a first pass at the issue, so it may not
be the final diff that'll end up getting committed. It'd be good to know if
it actually fixes the issue
highlight=(vsz_limit)#Service_limits
[2] https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Dictionary
> Am 25.01.2018 um 16:24 schrieb Thomas Robers:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 24.01.2018 um 23:39 schrieb Josef 'Jeff' Sipek:
> > > It looks like the binaries are stripped. There should be a
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 19:08:27 -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
>
> Apologies first for using two addresses, but I can’t currently read my
> email at distal.com. :-)
>
> I was previously running dovecot2-2.2.29.1_2 on FreeBSD 11 on sparc64.
> Trying to debug a problem I was having with one of m
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 18:55:47 +0100, Thomas Robers wrote:
> Am 23.01.2018 um 20:07 schrieb Josef 'Jeff' Sipek:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 14:03:27 -0500, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 18:21:38 +0100, Thomas Robers wrote:
...
>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 14:03:27 -0500, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 18:21:38 +0100, Thomas Robers wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm using Dovecot 2.3 and sometimes i get this:
> >
> > --- snip ---
> > Jan 23 14:23:13 mai
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 18:21:38 +0100, Thomas Robers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using Dovecot 2.3 and sometimes i get this:
>
> --- snip ---
> Jan 23 14:23:13 mail dovecot: imap(b...@tutech.de)<4880>:
> Panic: data stack: Out of memory when allocating 134217768 bytes
Interesting... imap is trying
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 18:47:37 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to see a mail that have a strange From header in bellow URL:
>
> https://www.mailsploit.com/index
>
> Then, I got BODYSTRUCTURE response contain next:
>
> ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com"))
>
> Are this problem
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 05:56:52 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
> Am Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:40:14 -0500 schrieb Josef 'Jeff' Sipek:
>
> > What happens if in dovecot's byteorder.h you add this before line 30:
> >
> > #undef bswap_8
> > #undef bs
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 20:07:00 +0100, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this commit
> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c9d76e2baf653fa5504d6849e5c1aae32eff3c53
>
> added code which can not be compiled with uclibc-ng 1.0.26 using buildroot:
Hrm... ok.
It'll be probably faster for you to try a
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 15:28:19 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > For v2.3 (maybe early next year):
> > https://git.dovecot.net/dovecot/core/commit/972c9172e9e6a0fc6053efb3d2ee9d354b67727f
>
> is t
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 16:21:59 +0200, Tom Sommer wrote:
> On the director (which is set to proxy doveadm commands):
>
> # doveadm force-resync -A "*"
> Error: User listing returned failure
> doveadm: Error: Failed to iterate through some users
I'm trying to reproduce this, but I can iterate use
47 matches
Mail list logo
