On 2014-07-02 15:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 16:10, schrieb Jonathan Tripathy:
On 2014-07-02 15:04, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 16:01, schrieb ihab:
i using roundcube with dovecot, i have a question if there is
possible to
know the number of users that using the mail
On 2014-07-02 15:04, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.07.2014 16:01, schrieb ihab:
i using roundcube with dovecot, i have a question if there is
possible to
know the number of users that using the mail system (in other word
the
online users)
no - how do you imagine that?
* roundcube is a web-a
On 28/06/2011 02:21, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level of
mail traffic else you'll soon regret running in any VM :)
Don't mean to start a flame war, but your statement above is just
simply inaccurate. The main difference
I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level of
mail traffic else you'll soon regret running in any VM :)
Don't mean to start a flame war, but your statement above is just simply
inaccurate. The main difference between a virtual server and a physical
server is that re
On 15/01/11 01:14, Brad Davidson wrote:
-Original Message-
I'm sorry I don't follow this. It would be appreciated if you could
include a simpler example. The way I see it, a VM disk is just a
small
chunck "LVM LV in my case" of a real disk.
Perhaps if you were to compare and contrast
On 15/01/11 00:59, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 01/14/2011 03:58 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
On 14/01/11 19:00, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 4:17 PM:
Regarding the servers, I was thinking of having a 2 node drbd cluster
(in
active+standby), which would export a
On 14/01/11 19:00, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 4:17 PM:
Regarding the servers, I was thinking of having a 2 node drbd cluster (in
active+standby), which would export a single iSCSI LUN. Then, I would have a 2
node dovecot+postfix cluster (in active-active
On 14/01/11 20:07, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Patrick Westenberg :
just to get it right:
DRBD for shared storage replication is OK?
Yes, but only if done correctly. ;) There is some concern on Stan's part
(and mime) that you might do it wrong (e.g., in a vm guest rather than
at the vm ho
On 14/01/11 03:26, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Jonathan Tripathy :
Either way, I would probably use a crossover cable for the DRBD
cluster.
I use 2 1Gb links bonded together, over crossover cables...
Could maybe even bond 2 cables together if I'm feeling adventurous!
Yes, recomm
On 14/01/11 03:39, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Henrique Fernandes :
for drbd you only need a heartbeat i guess.
Fencing is not needed for drbd, though recommended.
But to use gfs2 you need fence device, ocfs2 does not require once,
like the
ocfs2 driver takes care, it reboots if it thin
Does gfs2 guarantee integridy withou anm fency device ?
You make a fair point. Would I need any hardware fencing for DRBD (and
GFS2)?
Either way, I would probably use a crossover cable for the DRBD cluster.
I use 2 1Gb links bonded together, over crossover cables...
Could maybe even bond 2 cables together if I'm feeling adventurous!
Yes, recommended. That is what I do on all my clusters.
How do you bond the connection
On 13/01/11 21:34, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 7:11 AM:
Would DRBD + GFS2 work better than NFS? While NFS is simple, I don't mind
experimenting with DRBD and GFS2 is it means fewer problems?
Depends on your definition of "better". If you do t
On 13/01/11 10:57, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 2:24 AM:
Ok so this is interesting. As long as I use Postfix native delivery,
along with
Dovecot director, NFS should work ok?
One has nothing to do with the other. Director doesn't touch smtp
(afaik),
On 13/01/11 10:57, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy put forth on 1/13/2011 2:24 AM:
Ok so this is interesting. As long as I use Postfix native delivery, along with
Dovecot director, NFS should work ok?
One has nothing to do with the other. Director doesn't touch smtp (afaik),
In this Xen setup, I think the best way to accomplish your goals is to create 6
guests:
2 x Linux Postfix
2 x Linux Dovecot
1 x Linux NFS server
1 x Linux Dovecot director
Each of these can be painfully small stripped down Linux instances. Configure
each Postfix and Dovecot server to access t
Hi Everyone,
I wish to create a Postfix/Dovecot active-active cluster (each node will
run Postfix *and* Dovecot), which will obviously have to use central
storage. I'm looking for ideas to see what's the best out there. All of
this will be running on multiple Xen hosts, however I don't think t
:
Well, at least it work, it will fail until get the right databases.
[]'sf.rique
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Tripathy
mailto:jon...@abpni.co.uk>> wrote:
I had a look there, but that doesn't have anything on a
domain-by-domain basis
On 11/01/11
I had a look there, but that doesn't have anything on a domain-by-domain
basis
On 11/01/11 13:31, Henrique Fernandes wrote:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/MultipleDatabases
Is that are you looking for ?
[]'sf.rique
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Tripathy
Hi Everyone,
I wish to run Dovecot on my "Front End" outbound mail relay, and use
Dovecot purely for authentication purposes. However, each mysql database
for each domain will be on a separate server. Is there a way for dovecot
to authenticate against different databases depending on domain name?
Hi Everyone,
I wish to run Dovecot on my "Front End" outbound mail relay, and use
Dovecot purely for authentication purposes. However, each mysql database
for each domain will be on a separate server. Is there a way for dovecot
to authenticate against different databases depending on domain na
Hi Folks,
How scalable is dovecot. Do you think a machine with a dual core 2.8Ghz
processor and 2GB of RAM would do a business with 600 users? This server
will have a 100Mbps link to the net, however it will be access by the
business using a couple of ADSL lines (Roughly 7Mbps each).
This ma
22 matches
Mail list logo
