That did it! HOORAY! Thanks, Timo!
- Jon
On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 08:05 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/5/2008 7:11 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 13:33 -0700, Jon Fullmer wrote:
As best as I can tell, the answer seems to
ed the config with
the upgrade to 1.1.6.
- Jon
On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:46 AM, mouss wrote:
Jon Fullmer wrote:
I'm using Postfix, Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin, and Dovecot. They all
run on the same server (running Linux). The mailboxes are stored on
the same server in maildir format.
The
de: 432
user: X
group: XX
master:
path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
mode: 384
user: X
Is there anything else that would be helpful?
- Jon
On Nov 3, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/2/2008 3:33 PM, Jon Fullmer wrote:
How must
mtpd[11635]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from
rv-out-0506.google.com[209.85.198.239]: 554 5.7.1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Relay access denied; from=On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 14:26:21 -0700, Jon Fullmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Does the log show that the incoming messages are actually receive
/logs/mail.log does not have any errors
when
sending to lemcoe.com
Thanks for quick response.
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:41:31 -0700, Jon Fullmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What are you using as your MTA (i.e., which server is listening for
the incoming SMTP message)? Postfix? Sendmail
What are you using as your MTA (i.e., which server is listening for
the incoming SMTP message)? Postfix? Sendmail?
Have you checked for errors at this level?
- Jon
On Nov 2, 2008, at 1:34 PM, David M Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
I am running Dovecot 1.0.10 and have it working great on
ender.ath.cx
I'm using Postfix, Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin, and Dovecot. They all run
on the same server (running Linux). The mailboxes are stored on the
same server in maildir format.
The logical path for incoming messages (as I understand it) is:
1) received by Postfix; handed off to Amavisd-new
2) Amavi
hat
applies to -m parameter if it's specified. Or perhaps -m should silently just save the mail to INBOX. Hmm. Perhaps the
latter.
Anyone else have any better ideas?
On Jun 22, 2008, at 9:25 PM, Jon Fullmer wrote:
I had recently upgraded from Dovecot 1.0.14 to 1.1.0, and then to
1.1.1. Ev
I had recently upgraded from Dovecot 1.0.14 to 1.1.0, and then to
1.1.1. Ever since the upgrade to 1.1.0, I noticed that "plus
addressing" has failed. In case I'm using a foreign phrase, this is
the concept of sending an e-mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and having
dovecot (dovecot LDA, speci
You were right. The problem lay in the Postfix config, not the dovecot
(sorry to trouble the wrong list). The missing line was the
"recipient_delimiter = +". This line was in the amavisd-new config,
but not the Postfix. I put it in there. All is well.
For those curious, under my "userdb
Hmm... but it says "if the mailbox doesn't exist, it's created (unless
-n is used)". The mailbox does exist.
UNLESS, let me ask you this. I notice that the mailboxes are created
with a "." before them. For example, if I "ls -la" in the users
INBOX, I see user-created mailboxes, but they
I'm sorry I didn't clarify that. Yes, I am using Dovecot deliver as my
LDA. Here's the line I have in Postfix's master.cf:
dovecotunix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -f $
{sender} -d ${u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -n -m $
Forgive me, if this has been previously discussed. I researched as
best I could. I couldn't find anyone mentioning it.
Please treat me as a newbie.
I've recently set up postfix, amavisd-new/SpamAssassin, and dovecot.
All three utilize a user database in a MySQL db (on the same host). So
fa
13 matches
Mail list logo
