dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Have there been any issues with dovecot and using outlook express (imap)
as an email client? I have had a couple of users come up with random
missing emails. Im trying to figure out if it is user error, or
something wacky in my mailserver. I cant fin
Guy wrote:
I have what I'm sure is a stupid question. I'm trying to install
Dovecot 1.1.2 from source and my command sequence is this:
cd dovecot-1.1.2
./configure --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --with-mysql
--with-storagesmaildir --sysconfdir=/etc/dovecot
make
make install
cd ../dovecot-sieve-
t anything and "When a request
comes in (via imap) fork off a command who's name is given in the conf
file. ... imap_pre_cmd="xxx" " is a neat idea.
John
--
John and Catherine Allen
Bofferdange, Luxembourg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.homepages.lu/allen
Allen Sim wrote:
Hi,
I am a new linux user.I jz setting up a mail server.Downloaded &
Configured the components:CentOS,OpenLDAP,pam,dovecotMailServer,s
endmial,squireelmail etc
But wehn i want to check whether it works or not, so i open up my
clientmail, wchi is Netscape 7.2. in Edit > Mail &
You mean outlook even don't check on startup on which folders it
subscribed?
As far as I can see on my network, Thunderbird 2.x and Outlook Express
6.x and 7.x both show IMAP folders according to the Dovecot
"subscriptions" file, with no further user intervention needed.
Outlook may be differe
Danno Coppock wrote:
facts:
* There was only one active client.
* The client was T'bird, v1.5.0.10, running on XP.
Danno,
I saw some issues like this for a while, months ago, but concluded that it was a
Thunderbird issue rather than a Dovecot issue. For diagnostic purposes, can you try
Outlo
Charles Marcus wrote:
Nor do I think you followed the directions for editing it... if you
really did, then please provide the location of the instructions that
told you to use ':' instead of ' = ' for your config file parameters.
Charles,
I think you are forgetting that this is the output of
I'd like to add my thanks and congratulations, and also to express my appreciation of
Timo's friendly and constructive responses to questions, and his willingness to follow up
personally on issues raised - in my case, quite trivial ones.
If there were a Nobel Prize for open source software deve
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> That's fine for isolated users supporting only themselves. But it won't
win any mind share in the boardroom. If you want widespread deployment
to get proper testing (and hence a larger user base) you need a version
number that gives business people the confidence to inst
