need for what
> most of the MTAs do).
The only one like that I know of is Courier, and I found it incredibly
frustrating to work with. I use dovecot and postfix, but don't have the
virtual user issue -- all of my users (for twelve domains) have real
accounts.
Jim
--
Jim Trigg, Lord H
less settings, such as TB's "server supports folders that have
> subfolders". The HOWTO is mainly about this.
Like making "subscribed folders" be the same as "folders that are
checked for new mail" instead
On 8/2/07, Frank Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2 Aug 2007 11:40:
> >
> > any one have debian etch package for this ? :)
>
> Who are you? You are not somebody @pinky.frank-behrens.de, because that's me.
It's someone who sent a message without a full return addre
r directory (unstable, testing, or
>> some such).
>
> I think this is the easier way. If it's clear that unstable is unstable
> (i.e.:
> not to be used in production), version numbering is not a problem.
And what about people using OS packaging/port systems? My preference is
for a) (or as another poster suggested, 1.1{a,b,rc}n).
Jim Trigg