On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Curtis Maloney wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:44:54 +1000
From: Curtis Maloney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] v1.0.0 released
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.
Oh no!!! We never run version 1.0 of any software! Now I'm stuck
at rc32 forever! Arrrgh
Just kidding. :) Great job, great software.
Jeff Earickson
Colby College
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:04:23 +0300
From: Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rep
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:50:07 +0300
From: Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Dovecot Mailing List
To: Jeff A. Earickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] mbox sync/lock issue, rc28 and later
On
Help!
I just noticed this error this morning, we have been getting a
lot of these in rc28 and rc29, not in rc27 or before:
Apr 6 07:22:52 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(jaearick): mbox file
/var/mail/j/jaearick was modified while we were syncing, check your locking
settings
Pine
Gang,
I've been trying to build rc29 under Solaris 10 using either
"--with-gssapi" or Kerberos 5 ticket usage. I'm trying to figure
out how to set up fetchmail on another S10 box to do IMAP fetches
from dovecot without having to enter a password.
No matter what configure option I try, I get
Bu
Hi,
Works great for me; it has for a long time. My advice: upgrade your
C compiler. I usually build dovecot with gcc 4.1.1, but it will also
work well with Sun Studio 11. Sun Studio 11 is free if you have a
Sun support contract/sunsolve login. See:
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloa
Hi,
I run dovecot on Solaris 10, with authentication to Active Directory,
just fine. I make my Solaris system a Kerberos client to AD, then
then use PAM to allow authentication of users to AD. For information
on how to kerberize a Sun box (the same idea should work with Linux
and other versions
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Frank Cusack wrote:
FWIW, in my experience, all 1.0 software is utter shit and should be
avoided like the plague if stability is a requirement. So 0.99, 1.0, etc
is all meaningless to me.
1.0 = shit is almost always true for payware IMHO. Open source has a far
better tr
Timo,
After several days of flawless work, rc27 gave an assert/core
yesterday:
Mar 19 00:10:46 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(user): file
mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 423: assertion failed: (need_space ==
(uoff_t)-mails[idx].space)
Mar 19 00:10:46 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.erro
