> I understand. I will make sure I don't remove that information in future.
> Thank you for making me aware of that Marcus.
oops, sorry not Marcus - Charles. I do apologise.
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:23:18PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> This is irrelevant though. People should always be encouraged to do
> things the right way, and cross-posting the same Off-Topic question to
> multiple support lists - especially high volume lists like the postfix
> (and sometimes th
> The point is if you continue using the shotgun approach, you will
> quickly wear out your welcome and any good will others may be
> predisposed to provide.
I'm well aware of what the point is - i think it's ok to give people the
benefit of the doubt when they are new and trying to work things.
> *nod* Back those days I opted for the fetchmail "use IPv4 localhost"
> fix, to avoid a single local Received header showing an IPv6 address. :)
me too :-)
> Thanks for the note. Although I'm not happy to see the OP used the
> shotgun approach to get help...
indeed but it's not then end of
> The log snippet clearly shows that it is fetchmail generating the
> message. For some reason, it cannot connect to the localhost IPv6
> address for delivery via SMTP.
>
> I believe the solution is either (a) to fix your fetchmail conf, or
> (b) to have postfix listen on IPv6 addresses.
the op
