Hi,
> Maybe experiment with that? Try just 'INBOX' without the period?
This has the only effect of leaving the period out between
"INBOX" and folder names, ie. "INBOXTrash". And no, the bahaviour
of the LIST command does not change.
Thanks,
Jörg
Hi list,
I have
namespace private {
prefix = INBOX.
separator = .
inbox = yes
}
in an installation migrated from courier. I am testing with Outlook
Mobile 5 (OM) which uses 'LIST "" %' to get the folder list. Now
courier used to return
* LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX"
whereas dovecot re
Hi,
I am testing dovecot with Outlook Mobile 5 (OM5), which is currently
not working. OM5 connects, says "NOOP" and "CAPABILITY", does login
correctly and simply loggs out after that telling the user that it
could not download any messages. When I put an imapproxy[0] in front
of dovecot, OM5 works
Hi Timo,
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 16.05.2007 15:58:06:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dovecot: 2007-05-16 13:30:09 Error: IMAP(6126360): file
> > index-mail-headers.c:
> > line 260 (index_mail_parse_header): assertion failed: (part != NULL
Hi list,
> OpenLDAP uses another strategy, which is more robust aka needs less
> fragile interaction between the servers.
We have been thinking very long about replication. The requirement
is to have a backup computing center in distant location, so
replication has to work over a WAN connection
Hi,
more info:
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 16.05.2007 15:58:06:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dovecot: 2007-05-16 13:30:09 Error: IMAP(6126360): file
> > index-mail-headers.c:
> > line 260 (index_mail_parse_header): assertion failed: (part !
Hi,
dovecot crashes with the following trace when accessing some Maildirs:
dovecot: 2007-05-16 13:30:09 Error: IMAP(6126360): file
index-mail-headers.c:
line 260 (index_mail_parse_header): assertion failed: (part != NULL)
dovecot: 2007-05-16 13:30:09 Error: IMAP(6126360): Raw backtrace:
ima
