ually
was).
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 00:16, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 11/3/2011 1:24 PM, Felipe Scarel wrote:
> > Reasons to choose ZFS were snapshots, and mainly dedup and compression
> > capabilities. I know, it's ironic since I'm not able to use them now due
> to
&
move away from ZFS. Was a nice experiment
nonetheless, I learned quite a bit from it.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:27, Ed W wrote:
> On 03/11/2011 11:32, Felipe Scarel wrote:
> > I'm using native ZFS (http://zfsonlinux.org) on production here (15k+
> > users, over 2TB of ma
I'm using native ZFS (http://zfsonlinux.org) on production here (15k+
users, over 2TB of mail data) with little issues. Dedup and compression
disabled, mind that.
Dedup especially is a major source of trouble, I wouldn't recommend it for
production just yet.
Cheers,
fbscarel
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011
There is, though not readily available unfortunately. Thanks for the input,
always helpful.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:33, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 31.10.2011 12:28, schrieb Felipe Scarel:
> > Quick question about the usage of DRBD: I'm thinking of a setup on my
> > or
Quick question about the usage of DRBD: I'm thinking of a setup on my
organization here (15k+ users, 4TB of email data), but I'm holding back on
the clusterization due to the high volume of data.
Using DRBD would implicate mirroring those 4TB of data across all cluster
nodes? If yes, I might go wi
, yeah, my suggestion probably won't work.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:15, Felipe Scarel wrote:
> Alex, I've not personally done it (so just speculating here, bear with me)
> but you can customize Fail2Ban's actions if needed. So, if you can match the
> attemps through some regex (a
Alex, I've not personally done it (so just speculating here, bear with me)
but you can customize Fail2Ban's actions if needed. So, if you can match the
attemps through some regex (and since you're seeing them in the logs, that
should be quite possible), then you can edit one of the 'actions' to dro
01, Dave McGuire wrote:
>
> Good luck!
>
> FYI, my mail spools are on ZFS filesystems under Solaris on UltraSPARC.
> It is lightning fast with 100+ dovecot imap processes pounding away. I've
> not yet enabled compression and done the copy/recopy dance, though.
>
>
I was not aware of that... I went with FUSE to test the deduplication
feature of ZFS. I'll check out this link you've provided, many thanks Dave.
:)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 15:48, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 08/19/2011 02:45 PM, Felipe Scarel wrote:
>
>> I'm testing out
I'm testing out ZFS-fuse on my new install (talked about it on the other
thread), no issues so far. The builtin deduplication and compression sure do
help a lot, roughly 30% less storage space required so far.
They don't advertise it as exactly "production" quality, but I'm willing to
try it out,
wrote:
> On 2011-08-19 12:14 PM, Felipe Scarel wrote:
> > I'm setting up a Dovecot environment here, version 1.2.15 on Debian 6.0.2
> > "squeeze". This is actually a complete revamp of the previous setup we
> have
> > in-place here, built from the ground up with u
Hello all,
I'm setting up a Dovecot environment here, version 1.2.15 on Debian 6.0.2
"squeeze". This is actually a complete revamp of the previous setup we have
in-place here, built from the ground up with updated versions of all
involved software.
The operators have told me that they use some sc
12 matches
Mail list logo
