Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
may be this is a bit of topic, but i hope not. it's always a big
question which is the better to choose a hosting provider to keep and
manage you mail or setup your own mail server, hosting, virus and spam
filter etc.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jun 17, 2008, at 6:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jun 17, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
would it be possible to create a dovecot server as an imap proxy for
gmail and google apps?
imho many people/company would be love to use such a setup where he
can use
Peter Hessler wrote:
I do this exact thing, and it is faster than gmail itself. With IDLE, I
get the msg alert on my dovecot server before the web interface shows a
new message.
which exact thing?
and what does the "with idle" means?
Also, far more reliable, with a superior UI.
On 2008 Ju
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jun 17, 2008, at 6:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jun 17, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
would it be possible to create a dovecot server as an imap proxy for
gmail and google apps?
imho many people/company would be love to use such a setup where he
can use
hi,
may be this is a bit of topic, but i hope not. it's always a big
question which is the better to choose a hosting provider to keep and
manage you mail or setup your own mail server, hosting, virus and spam
filter etc.. now as more and more people and company move to gmail or
google apps ma
gmail or google apps do everything fro you for free...
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 5/30/2008, Samuel HAMEAU ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> Well, SW seems cool but misses the webcalendar part...
>>
>
> No it doesn't... create an account and log
hi,
nice test, but what would be also useful to compare cpu and memory
usage! with zimbra it's more important then anything else.
i'd like to see a comparison what kind of hardware (cpu and memory)
required for: 10, 100, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000 mailbox server. this's
where dovecot a big winner even f
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 15:21 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> probably that's the problem. what internaldate in dovecot, the file's
>> modify date in the maildir? i'd be nice if i can somehow set
>> internaldate to the date field with
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 11:53 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> hi,
>> we migrate from exchange to dovecot. we do it with imapsync. first we
>> try to do it with --syncinternaldates, but this fails on many messages
>> with invalid date, so we drop
hi,
we migrate from exchange to dovecot. we do it with imapsync. first we
try to do it with --syncinternaldates, but this fails on many messages
with invalid date, so we drop this option. unfortunately after this
those users who use outlook see the received date as the date we do the
migration in s
On Vas, Szeptember 9, 2007 06:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 15:04 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> > But since there's still a chance that index files could break
>> (although
>> > v1.1 tries harder than v1.0 to
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> But since there's still a chance that index files could break (although
> v1.1 tries harder than v1.0 to fix problems), it would be nice if the
> flags/keywords were written to metadata block once in a while. So if the
> index files are lost, flag changes wouldn't be complete
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 25.7.2007, at 12.49, Frittella Laurento wrote:
>
>> Now it seems to work using ldap backend to sync maildrop and dovecot
>> info ;)
>>
>> I followed wiki example and I'm using this simple convert script because
>> I'm storing quota info in ldap using the courier format S
hi,
it'd be very useful to include the quota warning patch in official
release. without it the quota support is not really useful since mail
simple dropped when quota is over. and most enduser never know what
happend, they just recognize mails are not coming:-(
thanks.
--
Levente
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> v1.1 plans have changed a bit. I'll release v1.1.alpha1 soon and hope to
> have a stable v1.1 in a month or two. The rest of the features that
> didn't make it into v1.1 will go to v1.2. I'll write more about this
> when v1.1 alpha is released.
>
> I also did a bit of benchm
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 00:52 +0800, M1 wrote:
>> Dear Timo,
>>
>> How about managedsieve?
>
> I think it'll have to wait for v2.0. Especially because I want it to be
> distributed in dovecot-sieve package, not in the main dovecot package.
> This just isn't possible without th
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Webmail.us will be sponsoring my Dovecot development for this summer.
> Other companies are also welcome to participate in the costs.
> Participation gets you:
>
> - listed in Credits in www.dovecot.org
> - listed in AUTHORS file
> - you can tell me how you want to use
17 matches
Mail list logo
