Re: [Dovecot] Encryption solution for messages at rest

So I suppose you're not a fan of the email hosting systems on the planet that bundle many services onto 1 box. Thanks for the feedback. - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks P: 505.327.7300 -Original Message- From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot

Re: [Dovecot] Encryption solution for messages at rest

org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Michael Orlitzky Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:52 AM To: dovecot Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Encryption solution for messages at rest On 10/28/2013 12:02 PM, Douglas Mortensen wrote: > Hi, > > We have clients with various security &

[Dovecot] Encryption solution for messages at rest

Hi, We have clients with various security & compliance requirements. Although not required, it would be ideal to have messages encrypted at rest. We already use SSL/TLS to secure the transmission of most email. However, it would be nice to have them encrypted sitting on our server. Is anyone do

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot Digest, Vol 116, Issue 38

Austinator, What's the JLG maintenance schedule? I should show you how to setup a CW Service Template & then you can have it as a weekly ticket. :-) - Doug Mortensen Impala Networks Sent from my Windows Phone From: dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org

Re: [Dovecot] BEWARE: This list is being harvested for leads

I personally didn't mind a one-time notice from the dev's team that that are now offering paid commercial support. What if I WANTED it? I felt like it was a courtesy email from them to let me know that it's available. If those emails continue unsolicited, then it may start to feel like spam to

Re: [Dovecot] dbox vs. mdbox

Thanks for the input Ed. The evening before you sent the message, I actually had decided to do just what you recommended (stick with what we know). We have since put the server into production, and things are working well. We built to a physical box, rather than a VM. I do like xen VMs myself. W

Re: [Dovecot] v2.0.10 released

Awesome. Just to confirm, if upgrading from 2.0.9 built from your source, all that we should need to do is download, extract, then: ./configure make stop dovecot services make install start dovecot services Correct? Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks P: 505.327.7300

Re: [Dovecot] /etc/pam.d/dovecot missing? during high load

Anybody know the answer to this one?? Any thoughts? I haven't received a response yet. Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks P: 505.327.7300 -Original Message- From: Douglas Mortensen [mailto:d...@impalanetworks.com] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 2:29

Re: [Dovecot] logging issues w/ login_max_processes_count on 1.x

Hmm. Is there any reason why it wouldn't show up for me, when I'm 99% positive we were hitting the max & still having new connections come in? Here's what I get when I grep my logs for those statements: servername:~# cd /var/log servername:/var/log# ls mail.* mail.errmail.err.2.gz mail.err.

[Dovecot] logging issues w/ login_max_processes_count on 1.x

Today I found our dovecot 2.x gracefully logged: dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped I am confident that we had the very same problem on our previous dovecot 1.x box. Of course with dovecot 1.x, the same relative setting is

Re: [Dovecot] process_min_avail being ignored?

Nevermind. My bad. Only now did I realize that my dovecot -n is totally missing anything regarding the "service imap-login", which I defined in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf as: service imap-login { service_count=1 process_min_avail = 200 process_limit = 1000 #vsz_lim

[Dovecot] /etc/pam.d/dovecot missing? during high load

This morning on our newly built server, the following was logged twice: auth: Error: pam(username,127.0.0.1): pam_authenticate() failed: Authentication failure (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?) This also happened to be during a time of 100+ imap-login processes, where we were seeing: master: Warning

[Dovecot] process_min_avail being ignored?

Today I found out we are having users w/ problems because: Mar 3 09:57:33 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped Mar 3 09:58:42 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connect

[Dovecot] dbox vs. mdbox

What are the pros and cons of both? Especially in regards to performance, stability, management & maintenance? I really appreciate feedback. We're on a time-crunch to migrate from a debian 5 box w/ dovecot 1.1 to a debian 6 box w/ dovecot 2.0.9 (built from source). Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Netw