At a guess, the directory gets listed, the names get sorted numerically,
and then read in order low-to-high. In theory, the end result will be the
same regardless of what order stuff gets read in, but doing it in a
deterministic order makes troubleshooting easier.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:31 PM,
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Ah, well, your original email never mentioned phones :-). In that case
> UUCP is not going to work well.
>
> I was assuming that Bob (and everyone else) has a laptop. In that case,
> he would carry his mail spool around with him, and send and
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> David Bishop writes:
> > Is there a way to get a running transaction log from a Dovecot instance
> to
> > synchronize (and I use that word very, very loosely) multiple instances
> > that don't share a network?
D'oh. Replied to Timo instead of to the list. Apologies!
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:07 PM, David Bishop wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On 28.11.2013, at 5.17, David Bishop wrote:
>>
>> > There are trams shuttling back and fo
Is there a way to get a running transaction log from a Dovecot instance to
synchronize (and I use that word very, very loosely) multiple instances
that don't share a network?
Why I would want to do such a thing: I have a couple way stations along a
long, winding road through very hilly country, an
