Re[2]: Possible hack via doveadm

Thank you Jeremy and Bernardo. Adding cert verification is something I'll have to delve into. Also possibly pushing the replication through the VPN. It's been a while since I last setup my replication pair - everything's been working smoothly so I've forgotten some of the key items. Particul

Possible hack via doveadm

I currently have two servers running with synchronization that I've been very happy with. However, I'm seeing the following in my logs recently: May 12 15:45:58 cloud1 dovecot: doveadm(194.165.16.78): Error: doveadm client not compatible with this server (mixed old and new binaries?) May 13 03

Re: [Dovecot] Error - zlib & fts

On 2/25/2014 10:50 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Just upgraded to a new Solr, so I did a full re-index. Saw some of these friendly messages: doveadm(csm...@amfes.com): Error: zlib.read(/var/mail/amfes.com/csmith/mdbox/storage/m.20): gz trailer has wrong CRC value at 28579617 doveadm(csm

[Dovecot] Error - zlib & fts

Just upgraded to a new Solr, so I did a full re-index. Saw some of these friendly messages: doveadm(csm...@amfes.com): Error: zlib.read(/var/mail/amfes.com/csmith/mdbox/storage/m.20): gz trailer has wrong CRC value at 28579617 doveadm(csm...@amfes.com): Error: read(zlib(/var/mail/amfes.com/c

Re: [Dovecot] Inotify max_user_instances

On 3/8/2013 12:31 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote: see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/0245/inotify-fd-why-is-the-limit-per-user-id-and-not-per-process Dovecot needs one inotify entity per IDLE, maybe more for internal purposes. So in theory, you will need: users> * + , because you use on

[Dovecot] Inotify max_user_instances

Maybe I have multiple problems - dunno. I've started seeing the following log lines: Mar 7 07:46:22 bubba dovecot: imap(dmil...@amfes.com): Warning: Inotify instance limit for user 5000 (UID vmail) exceeded, disabling. Increase /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances max_user_instances is cu

Re: [Dovecot] Tcpflow capture

On 11/29/2012 10:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 30.11.2012, at 7.57, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 11/29/2012 9:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I (hopefully) fixed my config - put 'zlib' into 10-mail.conf and removed it from the others. Re-indexing is now good on some mailboxes that w

[Dovecot] mdbox corruption

Trying to clean up the last of the corruption caused by my own stupidity. I now have two mailboxes for one user that give errors such as: doveadm(f...@amfes.com): Error: zlib.read(/var/mail/amfes.com/fax/mdbox/storage/m.9): gz trailer has wrong CRC value at 20065618 doveadm(f...@amfes.com): E

Re: [Dovecot] Tcpflow capture

On 11/29/2012 9:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I (hopefully) fixed my config - put 'zlib' into 10-mail.conf and removed it from the others. Re-indexing is now good on some mailboxes that were broken before - but I still have a fault on others. Using the tcpflow dump, I found a

Re: [Dovecot] Tcpflow capture

On 11/29/2012 12:49 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 29.11.2012, at 18.06, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 11/28/2012 10:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 29.11.2012, at 7.47, Daniel L. Miller wrote: doveadm fetch text -u amil...@amfes.com mailbox-guid a47e4e264aa1c94cc3513bc41c5f uid 12891 The

Re: [Dovecot] panic fts_solr for bad attachment

On 11/28/2012 8:49 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 11/28/2012 12:55 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.11.2012, at 10.50, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 11/27/2012 6:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.11.2012, at 4.43, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I did go through the code looking for that a few times

Re: [Dovecot] panic fts_solr for bad attachment

On 11/28/2012 12:55 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.11.2012, at 10.50, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 11/27/2012 6:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.11.2012, at 4.43, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I did go through the code looking for that a few times already but didn't notice anything. I

Re: [Dovecot] panic fts_solr for bad attachment

On 11/27/2012 6:45 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.11.2012, at 4.43, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I did go through the code looking for that a few times already but didn't notice anything. I went through it once more, and finally found the problem. :) http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.

Re: [Dovecot] panic fts_solr for bad attachment

On 11/27/2012 1:07 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 27.11.2012, at 17.38, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 11/27/2012 7:28 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 11/26/2012 10:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 27.11.2012, at 7.50, Timo Sirainen wrote: Nov 26, 2012 8:49:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException

Re: [Dovecot] panic fts_solr for bad attachment

On 11/27/2012 7:28 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 11/26/2012 10:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 27.11.2012, at 7.50, Timo Sirainen wrote: Nov 26, 2012 8:49:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR, code 8)) at

Re: [Dovecot] panic fts_solr for bad attachment

On 11/26/2012 10:08 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 27.11.2012, at 7.50, Timo Sirainen wrote: Nov 26, 2012 8:49:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR, code 8)) at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1011144,197790] Some

Re: [Dovecot] panic fts_solr for bad attachment

On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte 0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495) Annoying. I guess these f

Re: [Dovecot] panic fts_solr for bad attachment

On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote: Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte 0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495) Annoying. I guess these f

Re: [Dovecot] [BUMP] Unanswered: how to force FTS indexing?

On 11/18/2012 6:57 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote: on Sat Nov 17 2012, "Daniel L. Miller" wrote: On 11/16/2012 12:58 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote: on Thu Nov 15 2012, "Daniel L. Miller" wrote: On 11/14/2012 6:52 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote: Does anyone have an answer to this questi

Re: [Dovecot] [BUMP] Unanswered: how to force FTS indexing?

On 11/16/2012 12:58 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote: on Thu Nov 15 2012, "Daniel L. Miller" wrote: On 11/14/2012 6:52 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote: Does anyone have an answer to this question? Should I simply issue an IMAP search command, or is there a better way? Put this in a cron script

Re: [Dovecot] [BUMP] Unanswered: how to force FTS indexing?

On 11/14/2012 6:52 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote: Does anyone have an answer to this question? Should I simply issue an IMAP search command, or is there a better way? Put this in a cron script: doveadm search -A text zyxabcxyz > /dev/null That will perform a search through every mailbox on the sy

Re: [Dovecot] v2.1 memory usage

On 2012-11-11 17:20, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 12.11.2012 02:11, schrieb Daniel L. Miller: > >> On 11/6/2012 12:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> >>> On 6.11.2012, at 17.26, Ed W wrote: >>> >>>> On 05/11/2012 23:22, Timo Sirainen wrote: >

Re: [Dovecot] Solr 4.0 - lucene - FTS

On 2012-11-08 03:45, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-11-07 10:14 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > >> No, fts-lucene and fts-solr are separate backends. But I do have some small plans to add a few more features to fts-solr. > > Thanks again Timo, but one last follow-up... > > According to the wik

Re: [Dovecot] v2.1 memory usage

On 11/6/2012 12:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 6.11.2012, at 17.26, Ed W wrote: On 05/11/2012 23:22, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 23:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: This also provides a nice abstraction to OpenSSL, making it again possible to implement other backends like GnuTLS

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole 3.3 broken against Dovecot 2.1.10

On 31.10.2012 21:23, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > On 31.10.2012 21:16, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > >> On 31.10.2012 > > 04:26, Timo Sirainen wrote: > >>> I think this is a Dovecot bug, fixed > could also do this by adding -lssl -lcrypto manually to the &g

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole 3.3 broken against Dovecot 2.1.10

On 31.10.2012 21:23, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > On 31.10.2012 21:16, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > >> On 31.10.2012 > > 04:26, Timo Sirainen wrote: > >>> I think this is a Dovecot bug, fixed > could also do this by adding -lssl -lcrypto manually to the &g

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole 3.3 broken against Dovecot 2.1.10

On 31.10.2012 21:16, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > On 31.10.2012 04:26, Timo Sirainen wrote: > >> I think this is a Dovecot bug, fixed > > by: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/7d931927e4ac [1][1] > >> You > > could also do this by adding -lssl -lcrypto ma

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole 3.3 broken against Dovecot 2.1.10

On 31.10.2012 04:26, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 30.10.2012, at 17.00, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > >> I'm compiling as I normally do. The config line for Dovecot is: configure --with-ldap --with-ssl --with-bzlib --with-zlib --with-stemmer --with-lucene --with-ldap followed by ma

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole 3.3 broken against Dovecot 2.1.10

On 30.10.2012 14:46, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 10/30/2012 4:00 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > >> I'm compiling as I normally do. The config line for Dovecot is: configure --with-ldap --with-ssl --with-bzlib --with-zlib --with-stemmer --with-lucene --with-ldap followed by ma

[Dovecot] Pigeonhole 3.3 broken against Dovecot 2.1.10

I'm compiling as I normally do. The config line for Dovecot is: configure --with-ldap --with-ssl --with-bzlib --with-zlib --with-stemmer --with-lucene --with-ldap followed by make & make install Then a 'configure' for Pigeonhole, followed by make, yields: libtool: link: gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2

Re: [Dovecot] lmtp log message

On 7/28/2012 12:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 28.7.2012, at 21.50, Bård Johannessen wrote: On 2012-07-28 18:36, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 27.7.2012, at 9.01, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Jul 26 22:59:21 bubba dovecot: lmtp(20508): Disconnect from local: Client quit (in reset) in my log for every

[Dovecot] lmtp log message

I just tried switching to lmtp from lda. Messages are being delivered, but I now see messages similar to: Jul 26 22:59:21 bubba dovecot: lmtp(20508): Disconnect from local: Client quit (in reset) in my log for every message. Is this a normal sign-off - or does this indicate a misconfigurat

Re: [Dovecot] gnutls support

On 9/16/2010 5:41 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 20:25 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Other than license issues, is there an advantage to using gnutls vs openssl? Or is openssl superior - at least in the current implementations? Dovecot's GNUTLS support was written long

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot wants to access my music directory

On 5/10/2012 10:02 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: I am getting an SELinux error every time dovecot starts, because it is trying to access my music directory (/srv/music). I've read the doveadm-mount man page, and tried: doveadm mount add /srv/music ignore but it didn't make any difference. Now, I

Re: [Dovecot] Shared namespace

On 5/7/2012 1:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 7.5.2012, at 23.27, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 7.5.2012, at 23.15, Timo Sirainen wrote: So user1& user3 are missing entirely. If it "breaks" using the old style, then I would see user 2& 4 inboxes - but not user 1& 3. I also have other folders s

Re: [Dovecot] Shared namespace

On 5/7/2012 12:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 7.5.2012, at 22.13, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 5/7/2012 11:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 7.5.2012, at 16.52, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Ok - I broke it again. Tried changing mail_shared_explicit_inbox to no - problem mailboxes disappeared again

Re: [Dovecot] Shared namespace

On 5/7/2012 11:02 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 7.5.2012, at 16.52, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Ok - I broke it again. Tried changing mail_shared_explicit_inbox to no - problem mailboxes disappeared again. Changed back to yes - they came back. Problem with both Thunderbird and Roundcube as

Re: [Dovecot] Shared namespace

On 5/7/2012 6:46 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 5/6/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I'm not sure what's triggered it - I THINK it has something to do with a force-resync, but not sure. I'm no longer viewing my full list of shared mailboxes. I used to have a number

Re: [Dovecot] Shared namespace

On 5/6/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I'm not sure what's triggered it - I THINK it has something to do with a force-resync, but not sure. I'm no longer viewing my full list of shared mailboxes. I used to have a number of users shown - they had all had their ACL'

[Dovecot] Shared namespace

I'm not sure what's triggered it - I THINK it has something to do with a force-resync, but not sure. I'm no longer viewing my full list of shared mailboxes. I used to have a number of users shown - they had all had their ACL's set individually and were shown in the list. "doveadm acl debug"

Re: [Dovecot] mdbox packing

On 5/6/2012 8:12 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 5/6/2012 8:09 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 4/30/2012 5:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into new files? Particularly files

Re: [Dovecot] mdbox packing

On 5/6/2012 8:09 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 4/30/2012 5:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into new files? Particularly files of the maximum size? You could do it with

Re: [Dovecot] mdbox packing

On 4/30/2012 5:23 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 12:43 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into new files? Particularly files of the maximum size? You could do it with dsync. dsync seems to do a marvelous job - new

[Dovecot] Corrupted mdbox file

With an error like this: doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Error: Corrupted dbox file /var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/mdbox/storage/m.20 (around offset=74408): Unexpected EOF while reading metadata header What can be done? -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot/doveadm crash

On 5/4/2012 10:14 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 30.4.2012, at 23.16, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Having a problem with a mailbox. I've been trying to rebuild - but doveadm force-resync crashes. This is mdbox with sis. doveadm purge -u dmil...@amfes.com doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Panic:

[Dovecot] mdbox corruption

I have isolated the corruption in a mailbox to 4 mdbox files. Two of these (smaller) files cause the force-resync to report a breakage and save the file as m.XX.broken. The other two (larger) files cause a crash. Is there a way I can fix these files and recover the mails? -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot/doveadm crash

On 4/30/2012 1:16 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Having a problem with a mailbox. I've been trying to rebuild - but doveadm force-resync crashes. This is mdbox with sis. Here's a backtrace - gdb --args doveadm force-resync -u msie...@amfes.com Sent GNU gdb (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.2-1ubu

[Dovecot] Dovecot/doveadm crash

Having a problem with a mailbox. I've been trying to rebuild - but doveadm force-resync crashes. This is mdbox with sis. doveadm purge -u dmil...@amfes.com doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Panic: file istream.c: line 466 (i_stream_grow_buffer): assertion failed: (stream->max_buffer_size > 0) dovea

[Dovecot] mdbox packing

Is there a way to manually force an mdbox storage to be rebuilt into new files? Particularly files of the maximum size? -- Daniel

[Dovecot] Single Instance Storage management

Was there a doveadm command that checks the SIS files and removes any not referenced? Will the "doveadm purge -A" catch that? -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] Folder Aliases - Revisited Yet Again Four Years Later

On 8/13/2010 6:07 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 17:04 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: If we can't get clients to agree on a "standard" set of folders (probably reasonably safe assumption) [...] I'm kind of annoyed with listescape though. Hopefully for v

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 14:30:38 -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:06:48 -0700 > Daniel L. Miller articulated: > >> Unfortunately, the docs for the ltmp agent http://www.postfix.org/lmtp.8.html [1] don't say anything about adding these headers. I tried asking

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 4/6/2012 1:00 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-04-06 2:53 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I'm currently using Postfix 2.7, Dovecot 2.1, and the Dovecot LDA. I have a pure virtual user environment stored in LDAP. My messages include X-Original-To and Delivered-To headers. Well that is

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDA/LMTP vs postfix virtual delivery agent and the x-original-to header

On 4/5/2012 5:59 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2012-04-05 4:18 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > Also with 2.x you may want to use LMTP rather than the LDA Piping. > > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP I am preparing to convert my main client's postfix_courier-imap setup to dovecot 2.

Re: [Dovecot] Solr not indexing

On 2/24/2012 10:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 25.2.2012, at 8.09, Daniel L. Miller wrote: What did I do wrong to make this happen? "doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Debug: fts: Indexes disabled for namespace 'shared/%n/'" That's intentional. "shared/%n/" nam

[Dovecot] Solr not indexing

What did I do wrong to make this happen? "doveadm(dmil...@amfes.com): Debug: fts: Indexes disabled for namespace 'shared/%n/'" doveadm -D fts rescan -u dmil...@amfes.com doveadm(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: /usr/local

Re: [Dovecot] 2.1.rc5 Cannot delete folders from trash

On 2/14/2012 4:42 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote: On 02/14/2012 01:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 2/14/2012 12:06 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote: On 2/13/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I'm fighting the same issue. With the current release (2.1rc6) no errors are logged - but I

Re: [Dovecot] 2.1.rc5 Cannot delete folders from trash

On 2/14/2012 12:06 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote: On 2/13/2012 8:34 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: I'm fighting the same issue. With the current release (2.1rc6) no errors are logged - but I'm having problems deleted folders from trash. I've enabled tb-extra-mailbox-sep. Two fo

Re: [Dovecot] 2.1.rc5 Cannot delete folders from trash

On 2/12/2012 9:00 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 12.2.2012, at 15.27, Mike Constabel wrote: Another Question to this Option: # tb-extra-mailbox-sep: # With mbox storage a mailbox can contain either mails or submailboxes, # but not both. Thunderbird separates these two by forcing s

[Dovecot] Boehm

As the Boehm GC is an available option, do I take that to mean it's beneficial for some users but not most? -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] v2.1.rc6 released

On 2/13/2012 7:00 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 14.2.2012, at 4.54, Daniel L. Miller wrote: With this configure line: ./configure --with-ldap --with-bzlip --with-zlib --with-solr --with-lucene lucene-wrapper.cc:23: fatal error: CLucene.h: No such file or directory Base on this error, I suppose

Re: [Dovecot] v2.1.rc6 released

On 2/12/2012 1:01 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc6.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc6.tar.gz.sig I've finally finished all of my email backlog. If you haven't received an answer to some question/bugreport, resend the mail. This

Re: [Dovecot] Crash on mail folder delete

On 1/25/2012 4:04 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/25/2012 3:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using Thunderbird. I see the following in the log

Re: [Dovecot] Crash on mail folder delete

On 1/25/2012 3:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using Thunderbird. I see the following in the log: Dovecot version? 2.1.rc3. I'm comp

Re: [Dovecot] Crash on mail folder delete

On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using Thunderbird. I see the following in the log: Dovecot version? 2.1.rc3. I'm compiling rc5 now... -- Daniel

[Dovecot] Crash on mail folder delete

Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using Thunderbird. I see the following in the log: Jan 25 15:36:22 bubba dovecot: imap(dmil...@amfes.com): Panic: file mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name)) Jan

Re: [Dovecot] Imap Quota Exceeded - But Still Receiving Emails?

On 1/25/2012 2:01 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote: On 2012-01-25 05:38, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/24/2012 8:35 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote: Here is my dovecot config: plugin { quota = maildir:User Quota quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M } [..] So it picks up my set quota of 3MB

Re: [Dovecot] Imap Quota Exceeded - But Still Receiving Emails?

On 1/25/2012 1:39 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote: On 2012-01-25 05:38, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/24/2012 8:35 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote: Here is my dovecot config: plugin { quota = maildir:User Quota quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M } [..] So it picks up my set quota of 3MB

Re: [Dovecot] Imap Quota Exceeded - But Still Receiving Emails?

On 1/24/2012 8:35 AM, Palatine Web Support wrote: Here is my dovecot config: plugin { quota = maildir:User Quota quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M } [..] So it picks up my set quota of 3MB but dovecot is not rejecting emails if I am over my quota. Can anyone help? Is the quota plugi

Re: [Dovecot] Solr plugin

On 1/9/2012 7:00 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 9.1.2012, at 1.48, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/8/2012 3:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Jan 8 15:40:09 bubba

[Dovecot] Solr plugin

On 1/8/2012 3:40 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Jan 8 15:40:09 bubba dovecot: imap(us...@domain.com): Error: fts_solr: Lookup failed: 400 undefined field CC

Re: [Dovecot] Possible mdbox corruption

On 1/6/2012 12:32 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Jan 6 09:22:42 bubba dovecot: indexer-worker(us...@domain.com): Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 400 Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR, code 18)) at [row,col

Re: [Dovecot] Possible mdbox corruption

On 1/6/2012 9:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 6.1.2012, at 19.30, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Jan 6 09:22:42 bubba dovecot: indexer-worker(us...@domain.com): Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 400 Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR, code 18)) at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [482765,16] Jan 6 09:22:42

[Dovecot] FTS-Solr plugin

Solr plugin appears to break when mailbox names have an ampersand in the name. The messages appear to indicate '&' gets translated to '&--'. -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] Possible mdbox corruption

On 1/6/2012 2:57 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 6.1.2012, at 12.55, Timo Sirainen wrote: Jan 4 05:17:17 bubba dovecot: master: Error: service(indexer-worker): child 10896 returned error 83 (Out of memory (vsz_limit=256 MB, you may need to increase it)) Jan 4 06:17:17 bubba dovecot: indexer-wor

[Dovecot] Possible mdbox corruption

I thought I had cleared out the corruption I had before - perhaps I was mistaken. What steps should I take to help locate these issues? Currently using 2.1rc1. I see the following errors in my logs, including out of memory and message size issues (at 15:30): Jan 4 05:17:17 bubba dovecot: i

[Dovecot] fts_solr break-imap-search 2.1

Is "break-imap-search" still required using 2.1 with Solr to index TEXT & BODY searches? -- Daniel

[Dovecot] Lucene vs Solr with 2.1 single server

For a single server, is the Lucene backend now "better" than running a Solr server? -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] doveadm index

On 12/20/2011 2:18 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 19:27 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Does "doveadm index -A INBOX" reindex everything? What about users with multiple folders, both subbed& not subbed under INBOX? It indexes INBOX (only) for all users. And it do

[Dovecot] doveadm index

Does "doveadm index -A INBOX" reindex everything? What about users with multiple folders, both subbed & not subbed under INBOX? -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] Group ACL

On 10/7/2011 11:08 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: On 10/6/2011 8:38 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Using Dovecot 2.0, LDAP userdb & passdb, with prefetch: [..] I have added permissions for "$allshared" to a mailbox's Inbox. It does not appear in the shared folders list. Ot

Re: [Dovecot] Group ACL

On 10/6/2011 8:38 AM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Using Dovecot 2.0, LDAP userdb & passdb, with prefetch: [..] I have added permissions for "$allshared" to a mailbox's Inbox. It does not appear in the shared folders list. Other mailboxes, with explicit permission for a g

[Dovecot] Group ACL

Using Dovecot 2.0, LDAP userdb & passdb, with prefetch: hosts = myhost.mydomain dn = cn=x,cn=y dnpass = xyz123 auth_bind = yes auth_bind_userdn = uid=%n,ou=users,dc=x ldap_version = 3 base = ou=Users, dc=x user_attrs = =home=/var/mail/%d/%n, \ =mail=mdbox:/var/mail/%d/%n/mdbox, \ =uid=vma

Re: [Dovecot] OT - small hd recommendation

On 8/31/2011 12:41 PM, Thomas Harold wrote: On 8/30/2011 5:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: A little OT - but I've seen a few opinions voiced here by various admins and I'd like to benefit. RAID-10 is fine (note that the default mdadm RAID10 isn't actually RAID10, but it wo

[Dovecot] OT - small hd recommendation

A little OT - but I've seen a few opinions voiced here by various admins and I'd like to benefit. Currently running a single combined server for multiple operations - fileserver, mailserver, webserver, virtual server, and whatever else pops up. Current incarnation of the machine, after the la

Re: [Dovecot] mail spool filesystem

On 8/19/2011 10:49 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 8/17/11 7:42 AM, Adrian Ulrich wrote: I read that XFS is a good choice, but is not too reliable... Are you using Maildir or MBOX? In any case: XFS would be my last choice: XFS is nice if you are working with large files (> 2GB), but for E-Mail i

[Dovecot] NFS mail storage

The parameters listed for nfs installations (mmap_disable, doctlock_use_excl, mail_nfs_storage, mail_nfs_index) - are they necessary for data integrity, and/or do they compensate for NFS latency and improve performance? My understanding is the indexes are a critical part of a dbox storage, bu

Re: [Dovecot] Virtual Servers

I think we all know who the troll is here Yup. Me! **.:\:/:. .:\:\:/:/:. :.:\:\:/:/:.: :=.' - - '.=: '=(\ 9 9 /)=' ( (_) ) /`-vvv-'\ / \ / /|,|\ \ /_// /^\ \\_\ WW( ( ) )WW

Re: [Dovecot] Virtual Servers

On 6/27/2011 6:21 PM, Jonathan Tripathy wrote: BTW, I'm assuming a proper virtualisation solution such as Xen Paravirtualisation. "Proper"? You don't consider VirtualBox as such? In this instance, I'm using VirtualBox to run a few Windows guests - so Xen isn't an option for me. And as far

Re: [Dovecot] Virtual Servers

On 6/27/2011 1:03 PM, Ed W wrote: On 27/06/2011 19:40, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Maybe a little off-topic - but I hope not too much. Looking for some insight on setting up Dovecot under a virtual server. In particular, I use VirtualBox - and at the moment, Ubuntu Linux. Although not an option

Re: [Dovecot] Virtual Servers

On 6/27/2011 12:48 PM, Phil Turmel wrote: In the storage configuration of your VM, where you select the type of interface to emulate, there's a checkbox for using the Host's I/O cache. Does VirtualBox uses that to "trick" the guest kernel into not consuming memory for caching? If you can s

Re: [Dovecot] Virtual Servers

On 6/27/2011 6:06 PM, Noel Butler wrote: I hope this is a lightly used server and does not do any real level of mail traffic else you'll soon regret running in any VM :) Just all the mailing lists I subscribe to :) means NFS. My initial testing shows NFS results in a dramatically reduced per

Re: [Dovecot] Virtual Servers

On 6/27/2011 2:51 PM, Patrick Domack wrote: I wouldn't worry about *duplicate cache* as far as disk goes at all. This duplicate cache is only going to benifit your vm, if the host machine has enough left over ram. If the host machine doesn't have enough ram, there won't be any cache to worry a

[Dovecot] Virtual Servers

Maybe a little off-topic - but I hope not too much. Looking for some insight on setting up Dovecot under a virtual server. In particular, I use VirtualBox - and at the moment, Ubuntu Linux. Initial questions on configuration: Caching. It seems to me - and I'm probably wrong - that running a

[Dovecot] Default Global ACL

Can I use the .DEFAULT files with global acls to access all mailboxes without explicitly sharing them first? Or must a share be created for every individual mailbox before they will appear in the shared namespace? -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] ACL Groups

On 6/17/2011 1:28 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote: Ok - so where are acl_groups, and their access, defined? -- Daniel The permissions are set in the 'dovecot-acl' files: $ cat dovecot-acl anyone lr authenticated lrws group=PublicMailboxAdmins lrwsik You assign the groups to a particular user per User

[Dovecot] Global ACLs

If I have: plugin { acl = vfile:/usr/local/etc/dovecot/global-acls:cache_secs=300 } And then a file /usr/local/etc/dovecot/global-acls/.DEFAULT with owner lrwstipekxa user=dmiller lrwstipekxa Does that give me unconditional access to all mailboxes? -- Daniel

Re: [Dovecot] ACL Groups

On 6/15/2011 10:42 PM, Willie Gillespie wrote: On 6/14/2011 2:18 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: From the wiki: ACL groups support works by returning a comma-separated acl_groups extra field <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/ExtraFields> from userdb, which contains all the groups th

[Dovecot] ACL Groups

From the wiki: ACL groups support works by returning a comma-separated acl_groups extra field from userdb, which contains all the groups the user belongs to. User's UNIX groups have no effect on ACLs (you can "enable" them by using a special

Re: [Dovecot] ACL's from userdb

On 6/14/2011 1:19 AM, Willie Gillespie wrote: On 6/13/2011 2:47 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Using LDAP userdb/passdb. Is it possible to define a default set of ACL's at the userdb level, to provide access to shared mailboxes? How? You could maybe use acl_groups In Dovecot LDAP c

  1   2   3   >