Update: I tried with 2.0.21 and this also works just fine. So it must be
something which came in with 2.1.x
PS: Where is the documentaion for 2.1.x - i.e. for all the nice additions Timo
made? The Website "only" has 2.0.x, as far as I can tell?
(might be wrong here - hadn't touched the whole thi
Ok, here's a toughie:
Out of a whim (and because of the bad weather) I today decided to upgrade my
completely functioning 2.0.15 installation on my Mac OS X 10.6.7 system. NB:
It's not a Mac OS X "Server", as sold by Apple - I have compiled my dovecots
myself for quite a while.
Anyhow: At firs
While digging through the code I remember having seen something like an (yet
undocumented) "update_query" for SQL (and I guess something similar for the
LDAP faction as well)?!
Can that be used to augment the "doveadm pw" function to actually /set/ the
password for a given user instead of just
> I'm planning on implementing "IMAP client" backend for lib-storage, which
> means you could create namespaces that are proxied to remote IMAP server. Or
> even make Dovecot act as a caching IMAP proxy for your real IMAP server.
Yes, yes --- Y, please!!! :-)
Clemens
Hello All (and Timo in particular :-) --
While reading through some of the conversations on this list over the past two
weeks or so, I always thought "how would particular problem affect you
and how would you address it in your environment?".
This results in a few suggestions, or "thing to wis
>> is it syntacticly possible to define different "imap_capability" settings
>> per each inet-listener?
>
> local 10.0.0.1 {
> imap_capability = a
> }
> local 10.0.0.2 {
> imap_capability = b
> }
Understood. How would that work for different /ports/ (i.e., 143 vs. 10143)?
Thanks again for the
Hello -
is it syntacticly possible to define different "imap_capability" settings per
each inet-listener?
I might have to provide a service through a caching proxy sitting in front of
dovecot, which might involve restrictions re: the announced imap capabilities.
Any hint is highly appreciated!
>> It seems, that while anvil has gained some verbosity,
>
> Yes.
>
>> auth and imap-login (and maybe pop-login) seem to have lost their "voice".
>>
>> Is there any intention behind this or did I ran into a "bug"?
>
> Maybe. What OS?
Mac OS X 10.6.5
But again: I had just swapped binaries - ev
Hello -
I just noticed, that there seems to be a change in the way "process titles" are
being set between 2.0.6 and 2.0.7:
Behavior of 2.0.6: (ps aux | fgrep dovecot)
--
root 30803 0.0 0.0 601540708 ?? S 1:08AM 0:00.00
dovecot/log
_dovecot 30802 0.0 0.0
