On 01/29/2016 03:41 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> You can use:
>
> doveadm -o mail=maildir:/srv/mailboxes/example.com/mailbox123 search new
>
> You don't actually have to use the -u parameter, although doveadm may be
> using the wrong UID/GID/home then.
Awesome. Maybe the usage output
# /opt/d
Hey dovecot-users!
doveadm import offers to use i.e. a maildir as source and then import
into a users mailbox referenced via "-u" option. If one wants to import
only certain emails from the source a search-query can be given as well.
I was wondering if doveadm search also does offer to search a
Hello dovecot-users,
I am currently playing with Elastics ELK stack and was kind of surprised to NOT
yet find a good set of GROK or KV pattern to parse dovecots lush and information
rich logs.
The last post regarding this endeavor was in 2014
(http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-June/096589.h
> Luuk hat am 10. August 2014 um 18:24 geschrieben:
> Quota should be set according to some rules, and never be raised because
> of a 'quota reached'.
> What is the use of 'quota' if the admin raises your quota when things
> are full?
Guys, you are mixing up user quota and the "disk full" or bett
Hey dovecot-users,
did I miss anything anywhere about the configuration variables
"nfs_storage" and "mail_nfs_index"
being removed from the example configuration in 2.2?
In 2.1 they where both in 10-mail.conf commented out and set to their
default "no". But with 2.2 they are not in any of the ex
Hey Timo and all,
may I PING this subject once again to maybe get Timo's opinion.
On 23.07.2014 11:26, Christian Rohmann wrote:
> Bounced / rejected messages for something that will be usually be
> resolved very quickly and the messages can then be delivered after all
> is just
Hello Wolfgang,
On 29.07.2014 16:58, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
> I'm now facing the same issue with 2.2.13.
> zlib is working for new mails but as opposed to some information I
> found dsync (backup) does not convert old mails to compressed.
> For example this post suggests that it should happen:
On 22.07.2014 19:00, Moritz Augsburger wrote:
> The message could be already saved to disk by the MTA, so I don't see a
> reason for a hard reject, if it could be fixed within some hours by the
> admin (eg by expanding the volume, moving mailboxes between multiple
> storage systems etc).
>
> Mai
Hello dovecot-users,
(This problem was being discussed a little in this thread from 2011:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-May/059009.html)
I noticed (using LMTP) that Dovecot handles 'no space left on device'
just like an 'over-quota', if I read this part of method "static int
client_de
Hey Timo,
On 02.05.2014 12:37, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> During a reindex maildir_mail_get_received_date() does an i_stream_stat on
>> the the i_stream_seekable stream created in zlib_mail_cache_open, but this
>> istream does not know about the original maildir message file and always
>> returns
On 02.05.2014 12:49, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 24.4.2014, at 23.54, Richard Platel wrote:
>> When a compressed maildir message has a bad S= size in its filename it puts
>> the user in an unrecoverable state, since maildir's do_fix_size function
>> just does a stat() on the maildir file and sav
Hey Timo,
> Roland Rosenfeld hat am 12. Februar 2014 um 14:12
> geschrieben:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > That's quite a lot of work for fixing something that shouldn't
> > really be happening in the first place. I think those problems only
> > happen once immediately after en
Hey Timo,
hope you are not fully knocked out by the flu?
On 04.02.2014 23:13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> - I'm planning on going through Dovecot list's mails this week and make
> v2.2.11 release
Since you sometimes ask for bugs or improvements to take into an
upcoming release ... may I nag you ag
Hey dovecot-users,
Am 12.12.2013 22:01, schrieb Frerich Raabe:
On 2013-12-12 12:47, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
So here dovecot detects the wrong S value, but instead of fixing it by
using the uncompressed size, it renames to the same file name as
before...
I observed exactly the same issue ever
Hey Jogi,
On 06.10.2013 12:39, Jogi Hofmüller wrote:
> Our goal is to do the migration without interrupting the service
> for our users too much. Currently we tend to using dsync. So I am
> asking for best practice suggestions, tips and hints from people
> who have done such a thing before.
I w
Hey Stephan,
On 05/09/2013 11:23 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
It basically acts as a front-end to your normal MTA. First of all, it
provides a convenient way to add SMTP AUTH support to any MTA. But the
main goal for this project is to implement an SMTP submission server
with full support for the LE
Hey Marc,
On 04.12.2012 15:15, Marc Perkel wrote:> Just wondering if there's an
open source Linux alternative to MS
> Exchange so that all the features of outlook work?
Open-Xchange. They have a module called OLOX2 that enables you to make
MS Outlook think it's connected to a Microsoft Exchange.
Hello dovecot-users,
I have a question/suggestion regarding the submission_host feature of
the lda (either via dovecot-lda binary or lmtp) in combination with sieve.
When trying to deliver message to a mailbox and this message has a sieve
redirect action applied to it, dovecot is using the config
On 29.10.2012 21:39, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> So what do you think about v2.2 allowing delivery of one last mail
even if it brings the user over quota? Except add a limit that if the
message size is as much as the user's entire quota limit it wouldn't be
added (or 50% or ..?). Also IMAP wouldn't allo
Hey dovecot-users,
On 14.09.2012 16:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I've a whole new design for it and I was planning on implementing it for
> v2.2. Do you want to help coding it? :) Which storage would you want to use?
I'd vote for OpenStack's Swift or Ceph's RADOS. They are both gaining
momentum wi
On 01.06.2012 22:58, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
[...] I sat down and put together a list of stat items we think to be useful in
daily
dovecot usage.
Quite a list. But I believe most of those values are quite useful and I
would also love to see such a rich set of measurements being available.
On 29.05.2012 12:23, Cor Bosman wrote:
At first I thought maybe one of our 35 imap servers was having issues sending
data, but all individual servers show this patters. Here is a bunch of
individual servers:
http://grab.by/dReC
Anyone have any idea what could cause such a pattern? Maybe dovecot
Hey all,
On 04/01/2012 11:13 AM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
I'm using dovecot on vps, how can i use dovecot stone? Is it enough to
use photo of stone as boot splash or should i start dovecot with
LD_PRELOAD="/path_to_photo.jpg"?
Valid questions, what about Dovecot vStones?
Apart from this practi
Hey dovecot-users,
clients that speak telnet based protocols like http, smtp usually encode
IDN (International Domain Names) containing UTF-8 characters into ACE
(ASCII Compatible Encoding) punycode.
I am wondering what the case was with managesieve (RFC 5804). For
example if I was using a userna
Hey dovecot-users,
we are running dovecot 1.2.15 and are seeing some odd errors in our
logfiles:
--- dovecot.log ---
2010-11-22 12:34:56 imapserver local2.warning dovecot dovecot:
IMAP(usern...@domain.tld): Timeout leak: 0x4bd230
--- /dovecot.log ---
Those errors only appear if connections are d
Hey all,
On 07/14/2010 11:02 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:55 +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
>>> Any thoughts?
>> Could the location be made dependant on the file size?
>
> The file size isn't known beforehand.
But it could be known if the SIZE extention of LMTP is used right?
T
Hey there,
On 04/21/2010 11:20 AM, Vlamsdoem wrote:
> I would like to monitor users quotas in Dovecot but I don't find a way
> to do it for every user.
One option is to use a database to store the quota or better 'usage of
quota', then it's always there for you to access.
> Acutally I can log in
Hello,
On 02/08/2010 01:54 PM, Holger wrote:
>> Is this problem Dovecot related ?
>> Do you have the same trouble ?
> Yes and I downgraded to 3.0.0.
No, the Problem is on TB's aka Mozilla's side. Downgrading to 3.0.0
should not help at all. The "CONSTORE" command is not handled correctly
by TB, s
Just wanted to share the bad news:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541337
It seems that Dovecot is really showing the Mozilla Thunderbird team how
to read and use an RFC ;-)
--
Christian Rohmann
Content Delivery Server u. Dienste
Network Engineering & Design
NETCOL
Hey folks,
allow me to bump this notice about a possible plain bug in the sieve
filter conversion.
Regards
Christian
On 12/30/2009 01:37 PM, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I noticed the following problem in dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.14:
> The following vacation causes trouble with the Subject
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Christian Rohmann wrote:
>
>> Is there no way to share mailboxes (folders) between different servers?
> Not yet.
"yet" sounds like "Yeah, reasonable request. There is already something
planned" :-P
Christian
dMailboxes/Shared"; dovecot needs access to
the other mailbox. Does that automatically mean that one dovecot machine
needs to have filesystem access to the all mailboxes that are to be shared?
Is there no way to share mailboxes (folders) between different servers?
(apart from using NFS i.e.)
32 matches
Mail list logo
