Re: [Dovecot] / vs.

2014-05-19 Thread Boris
s = > The leading "<" means "pretend I typed the contents of this file right > here." If instead you had, > > valid_users = /path/to/valid/users > > then dovecot might think you have one valid user named > "/path/to/valid/users." Thank you for the explanation Michael. I think I understand it now. Boris

Re: [Dovecot] / vs.

2014-05-17 Thread Boris
On Saturday 17 May 2014 17:41:05 Reindl Harald wrote: > because there is a documentation and the only correct answer > not following that is "you are in the area of undefined bahvior" The documentation does not(!) state this. It could be another way of including the file. > that's not a dovecot

Re: [Dovecot] / vs.

2014-05-17 Thread Boris
Why so aggressive? I just noticed that I missed the "<" and wondered whether if makes a difference because it seems to work without it. I know where to find the documentation but searching for this question is a bit hard since I can't search for "<". And the wiki doesn't explain the syntax anywa

[Dovecot] / vs.

2014-05-17 Thread Boris
The default configuration file for Dovecot in Debian uses: ssl_cert =

Re: [Dovecot] Why SETACL accepts non-existant users (was Re: Why are ACLs for non-existent mailboxes accepted?)

2014-02-24 Thread Boris
On Monday 24 February 2014 18:04:40 Michael M Slusarz wrote: > SETACL only returns NO if you "can't set acl". But "can't set acl" != > "mailbox has to exist". Example: a server can allow pre-setting ACLs > for mailboxes that MAY be created in the future. Perfectly legal > according to the spec.

Re: [Dovecot] Why SETACL accepts non-existant users (was Re: Why are ACLs for non-existent mailboxes accepted?)

2014-02-24 Thread Boris
On Friday 21 February 2014 08:54:34 Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Boris wrote: > > On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:45:32 Boris wrote: > >> Dovecot 2.2.9-1 accepts SETACL commands that share mailboxes to > >> non-existent mailboxes. There is no erro

Re: [Dovecot] Why are ACLs for non-existent mailboxes accepted?

2014-02-20 Thread Boris
On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:45:32 Boris wrote: > Dovecot 2.2.9-1 accepts SETACL commands that share mailboxes to non-existent > mailboxes. There is no error message. Is this intended behavior? > > I think it's bad because clients present a success message when indeed the >

[Dovecot] Why are ACLs for non-existent mailboxes accepted?

2014-02-20 Thread Boris
Dovecot 2.2.9-1 accepts SETACL commands that share mailboxes to non-existent mailboxes. There is no error message. Is this intended behavior? I think it's bad because clients present a success message when indeed the intent of the user failed. Typos are hard to catch.

Re: [Dovecot] Syntax of pattern in map section

2014-02-20 Thread Boris
On Sunday 16 February 2014 17:30:33 da-dovecotlist...@abelonline.de wrote: > I can't seem to find any documentation on the meaning/syntax of the > "pattern" variable in map sections that are found in > dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext for example. I am trying to setup shared folders. > I need to understa

[Dovecot] Active Directory 2003 user database and passwords with special characters

2012-10-29 Thread Boris PINON
Hello everybody, As explained in the topic, i have troubles with authentication of my users. First of all, sorry for my poor english... I'm running dovecot v1.2.15 on a Debian 6 64bits server up to date. My users database is an Active Directory 2003 (it's important to know that because Active Di

Re: [Dovecot] BUG - lmtp multiple recipients fail - setuid issue?

2011-08-24 Thread Boris Lordis
Thank you! That worked. Best regards, -Boris On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 14:28 -0700, Boris Lordis wrote: >> Jul 27 11:24:42 testmailserver dovecot: lmtp(12412, steve): Error: >> link(/spool/mail/j/jerry/mail/INBOX/u.20423, &

[Dovecot] BUG - lmtp multiple recipients fail - setuid issue?

2011-08-01 Thread Boris Lordis
tp(12412, steve): +1IXBeVXME58MAAARoVNxQ: msgid <201107271824.p6RIOPa5020900 at backup.>: save failed to INBOX: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2011-07-27 11:24:41] Best regards, -Boris I am using version 2.0.13. dovecot -n shows this: # 2.0.13: /etc/dovecot/dov

Re: [Dovecot] lmtp multiple recipients fail

2011-07-28 Thread Boris Lordis
erver dovecot: lmtp(12412, steve): > +1IXBeVXME58MAAARoVNxQ: msgid=<201107271824.p6RIOPa5020900 at > backup.>: save failed to INBOX: Internal error occurred. Refer to > server log for more information. [2011-07-27 11:24:41] > > lmtp seems to be attempting to write a link from o

[Dovecot] apache2 mod_authn_dovecot

2010-02-11 Thread Boris Manojlovic
URL: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/bmanojlovic/ Please comment or raise issues if you think it is useful or full of bugs :). Boris Manojlovic P.S. Very basic README - HOW TO is on this URL http://github.com/bmanojlovic/mod_authn_dovecot/blob/master/README

[Dovecot] documentation for developers

2007-09-19 Thread Boris Lorbeer
just described? Boris -- Dipl. Phys. Boris Lorbeer science + computing ag Senio

[Dovecot] Changes in authentication's???

2007-05-10 Thread Boris Ivanov
sdb: driver: passwd passdb: driver: passwd-file args: /usr/local/www/data/Email/RefCont/etc/master.passwd userdb: driver: passwd userdb: driver: passwd-file args: /usr/local/www/data/Email/RefCont/etc/passwd Whats wrong? Can it be fixed? Thanks -- Yours Boris