Re: [Dovecot] Upgrade from 0.99.x to 1.1.x

2009-04-08 Thread Anders Melchiorsen
Wolfram Schlich wrote: > Do I understand it correctly that when directly upgrading from > 0.99 to 1.1, Dovecot does the subscriptions renaming but not the > keywords renaming and conversion, but that when I manually rename > all .customflags files to dovecot-keywords, it does the format > conversi

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot load balancing

2008-07-31 Thread Anders Melchiorsen
Thomas Hummel wrote: > The same machine is running postfix-2.4.6 with amavisd-new-2.5.4 (no > spamassassin) and clamav-0.93.1. I'm using procmail-3.22 as the LDA. > > I installed dovecot-1.1.2 on non-standard ports for test and plan to > switch to > it as I read on this list it performs better, lo

Re: [Dovecot] Server-side sieve for client-side copies

2008-07-29 Thread Anders Melchiorsen
Daniel L. Miller wrote: But...then I still need to get my users to not have their "Sent" enabled or I'll have a lot of duplication. Including the users who are using remote clients. Hah! I still want my APPEND-Sieve support! (writing again, now with my subscribed sender address) What is

Re: [Dovecot] Server-side sieve for client-side copies

2008-07-29 Thread Anders Melchiorsen
Daniel L. Miller wrote: First - I can't argue the point about BCC'ing - you're certainly correct that that would be the "simplest" solution in terms of immediate implementation - if we assume users are willing to change their habits. Since I don't - I'm exploring server-side options If you

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve Notify Error

2008-07-28 Thread Anders Melchiorsen
Leroy Philippe wrote: > notify > :method "mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > :message "Vous avez recu un message sur votre adresse"; This seems to work: notify :method "mailto" :options "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" :message "Vous avez recu un message sur votre adresse"; Cheers, Anders.