Hi,
I'm having some trouble with matching. The regexp in my dovecot.sieve
file should match on email addresses, but does not.
# The code:
if header :matches "From" "<[a-z0-9-]*@[a-z0-9-.]*>" { set "sender" "${1}"; }
if not execute "grepfrom" ["${sender}"] {
if envelope :matches "from" "*" {
ot;dovecot on behalf of Christian Kivalo"
wrote:
| | >
| | >
| | >
| | > Am 9. Mai 2017 17:47:13 MESZ schrieb Adam Shostack :
| | > >Hi,
| | > >
| | > >Is there a clean way to match on an email address the way procmail
| | > >^TO_ did?
So I'm confused as to why you're piping back from procmail to dovecot
LDA, rather than having procmail be the final LDA.
Why not use:
:0 w
* ^List-ID:.*jenkinsci-dev.googlegroups.com
mailing-lists/jenkinsci-dev/
(The trailing slash tells procmail that jenkinssci-dev is a maildir,
not an mbox)
A
e
directory name.
Can someone point out where I'm failing?
Adam
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:50:23AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
| On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:27:22AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
| >On 5/9/17, 11:25 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Christian Kivalo"
wrot
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:41:10PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
| | >^TO_ did? that was a macro which expanded to
| | >(^((Original-)?(Resent-)?(To|Cc|Bcc)|(X-Envelope
| | >|Apparently(-Resent)?)-To):(.*[^-a-zA-Z0-9_.])?)
| | >
| | >so you could write
|
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:27:22AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
| On 5/9/17, 11:25 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Christian Kivalo"
wrote:
| Am 9. Mai 2017 17:47:13 MESZ schrieb Adam Shostack :
| >Hi,
| >
| >Is there a clean way to match on an email addre
Hi,
Is there a clean way to match on an email address the way procmail
^TO_ did? that was a macro which expanded to
(^((Original-)?(Resent-)?(To|Cc|Bcc)|(X-Envelope
|Apparently(-Resent)?)-To):(.*[^-a-zA-Z0-9_.])?)
so you could write
* ^TO_dovecot
dovecot
and grab messages to the list. In siev
Thanks for the previous answer on :execute. In thinking about
malicious input, I am worried about the possibility that mail will be
sent with a clever from line. (Section 7 of
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5229.txt is great, btw)
To address this, I'm considering the following, and would appreciate
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:41:01AM +0100, Stephan Bosch wrote:
| Op 2/8/2017 om 1:27 AM schreef Adam Shostack:
| > Hi,
| >
| > As I migrate to sieve, I would like to carry over the logic I had in
| > procmail rules, which let me take all mail where I'd never sent email
| > to
Hi,
As I migrate to sieve, I would like to carry over the logic I had in
procmail rules, which let me take all mail where I'd never sent email
to that address into a final spam catchall, which I called
"neversent."
I see that sieve can't run external programs, and I wonder if that
means I'm SOL,
10 matches
Mail list logo
