On 26/06/2024 20:48, pgnd via dovecot wrote:
for anyone interested, for dovecot v2.3.14+ @ Fedora,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dovecot/blob/rawhide/f/dovecot-2.3.14-opensslv3.patch
Until this discussion started I didn't realize that I've been using the
unsupported version of op
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, Peter via dovecot wrote:
On 27/06/24 06:48, pgnd via dovecot wrote:
for anyone interested, for dovecot v2.3.14+ @ Fedora,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dovecot/blob/rawhide/f/dovecot-2.3.14-opensslv3.patch
dovecot hums along nicely.
i've not seen a _crash
My understanding was that OX were hoping for a 6-figure sum, or, at best, a
high 5-figure.
Certainly as far as I am aware nothing was ever going to be on the table for
4-figures or below.
If sales have changed their mind and introduced affordable options for
non-large-scale deployments then t
Although things do change in our sales too and things are not set in stone.
There are some floor limit, but I know that megabucks are not needed to buy pro
licenses.
Aki
> On 27/06/2024 11:03 EEST Laura Smith via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps try reading my last post Scott.
>
> Perhaps espe
Perhaps try reading my last post Scott.
Perhaps especially the bit where I said OX were offered money but they were not
interested without megabucks being spent.
As others have said, take your cheap, unsubstatiated, attacks elsewhere chum.
On Wednesday, 26 June 2024 at 21:24, Scott Q. via d
