> "George" == George Asenov via dovecot writes:
I don't have a real suggestion, but I do think you can clarify your problem.
> No one have idea what is wrong here?
> On 07-Jun-24 4:10 PM, George Asenov via dovecot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have very strange issue. Sieve generate copies of us
> On 06/13/2024 2:33 AM MDT MK via dovecot wrote:
>
> What is the reason that Debian 12/Ubuntu 22.04/RHEL 9 are not supported by CE
> 2.3?
OS-provided dependencies that won't work with 2.3 code (e.g., OpenSSL).
michael
___
dovecot mailing list -- d
On 13/06/2024 05:28, MK via dovecot wrote:
but with Debian there is e.g. only 2.3.19 and if you want 2.3.21 then only the
community repo would remain.
There's 2.3.21 in stable-backports.
--
They also surf who only stand on waves.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br
__
We use fail2ban also. It's good for automatically updating the Linux
firewall based on the system logs. However, if you just want to block
one port for everyone you can do it yourself with one firewall rule.
For instance, if you have a database server that should only be accessed
by systems o
Thanks Michael for the information.
What is the reason that Debian 12/Ubuntu 22.04/RHEL 9 are not supported by CE
2.3?
I think for the user it would be best to get dovecot lates version from the
community repo.
In the past this works realy fine for me with RHEL 7/8 based Distros.
Oliver
In the case of ubuntu 22.04 you are lucky, but with Debian there is e.g. only
2.3.19 and if you want 2.3.21 then only the community repo would remain.
And e.g. for RHEL 9 the version I can get via RHEL Repo is 2.3.16. Get dovecot
via the community repo would be the best in my optinion. Provided i
I also noticed this affects local documentation in the Dovecot release
(v2.3.21), e.g. the old URL is referenced in many of the man files
that get installed.
It is probably a good idea to setup a 301 redirect rather than just
dumping a 404 on the website too.
On 12/06/24 8:05 AM, aki.tuomi wro
