On 12/29/2021 9:53 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-12-30 05:40, Laura Steynes wrote:
Because gmail is dumb. good mail client interfaces see reply-all with
a mailing list as reply to list only
so you are just a gmail victim ? :=)
I have no experience on this with gmail. I haven't subscribe
On 2021-12-30 05:40, Laura Steynes wrote:
Because gmail is dumb. good mail client interfaces see reply-all with
a mailing list as reply to list only
so you are just a gmail victim ? :=)
I'll await someone more knowledgeable to answer my original questions
I think
knowledge ?
would imap pr
Because gmail is dumb. good mail client interfaces see reply-all with a
mailing list as reply to list only
I'll await someone more knowledgeable to answer my original questions I
think
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 2:27 PM Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-12-30 04:58, Laura Steynes wrote:
> > That p
would be nice to see added :=)
talvi.dovecot.org txt "spfv1 a -all"
On 2021-12-30 04:58, Laura Steynes wrote:
That prints out what I have now, inside protcol sections, which
differs from the config examples, so is of no use to my questions,
thank you for trying anyway
this is maillists, why did you reply privately aswell ?, more info ?
HPNY all
That prints out what I have now, inside protcol sections, which differs
from the config examples, so is of no use to my questions, thank you for
trying anyway
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 1:13 PM Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-12-30 03:34, Laura Steynes wrote:
> > easier to find options in one fi
On 2021-12-30 03:34, Laura Steynes wrote:
easier to find options in one file, rather
than trying to sift through 40 included files like I am looking at now
:-)
you dont have spare times
doveconf -n
no need to read more
if something should change to the better, it would be better default
co
Happy Holidays,
And if you like me are working throughout so more senior engineers get
their holidays, my condolences hah
Taking the time to bring our dovecot.conf into the 2021/22 era .since its
quiet time of year,
Do I read it right that where we have things like
service imap {
process_l
On 2021-12-29 17:51, Ken Wright wrote:
On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 18:34 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 29/12/2021 18:09 Ken Wright wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 09:51 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >
> > > On 29/12/2021 05:22 Ken Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > Any further information available upon re
Hi
I’m running dovecot-2.3.15 and dovecot-pigeonhole-0.5.15 on FreeBSD 13
To day i suddenly get errors in my personal logfile (.dovecot.sieve.log)
sieve: info: started log at Dec 29 20:26:42.
.dovecot: error: cumulative resource usage limit exceeded.
Is there anything I can do about this err
On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 18:34 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > On 29/12/2021 18:09 Ken Wright wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 09:51 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 29/12/2021 05:22 Ken Wright wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Any further information available upon request!
> > >
> > > Maybe s
> On 29/12/2021 18:09 Ken Wright wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 09:51 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >
> > > On 29/12/2021 05:22 Ken Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > Any further information available upon request!
> >
> > Maybe systemd is blocking it?
> >
> > If systemd unit has ProtectSystem=st
On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 09:51 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > On 29/12/2021 05:22 Ken Wright wrote:
> >
> > Any further information available upon request!
>
> Maybe systemd is blocking it?
>
> If systemd unit has ProtectSystem=strict or ProtectSystem=full, try
> adding override.conf with
>
> [S
Aki
sorry for not being specific enough. I already use director on my two
public-facing dovecots. Although the mailboxes on my dovecot backend
are in nfs there is only one backend dovecot accessing the mailboxes. I
had two backends long ago and the the nfs is a relict of that time. But
atm only ha
> On 29/12/2021 11:40 tobiswo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 11:26 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >
> >
> > Do you have multiple backends with concurrent access via e.g. nfs?
> >
> > Aki
> >
>
> Aki,
>
> yes all mailboxes are in a nfs share. Concurrent access could be
> possi
On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 11:26 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
> Do you have multiple backends with concurrent access via e.g. nfs?
>
> Aki
>
Aki,
yes all mailboxes are in a nfs share. Concurrent access could be
possible as I have several MUA (my desktop and my mobiles). Although
only the client on
> On 29/12/2021 11:20 tobiswo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Hi list
>
> I have weird issue with my Dovecot 2.3.17.1 (476cd46418)
> When deleting a certain amount of messages from my INBOX via my MUA
> (Evolution) all over sudden dovecot starts to panic
>
> Panic: file mail-index-transaction-fini
Hi list
I have weird issue with my Dovecot 2.3.17.1 (476cd46418)
When deleting a certain amount of messages from my INBOX via my MUA
(Evolution) all over sudden dovecot starts to panic
Panic: file mail-index-transaction-finish.c: line 185
(mail_index_transaction_get_uid): assertion failed: (seq <
18 matches
Mail list logo
