On 2021-07-29 10:12, Vladislav Kurz wrote:
I thought that mandatory authentication is the whole point of having
mail
submission on other port than 25. But looking at the RFC:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6409#section-4.3
It says that authorization by other means (being within a prot
On 2021-07-28 19:08, Dan Conway wrote:
Yes Dovecot will proxy the connection to the real MTA. My question is
why authentication is _always_ required on Dovecot when submission is
used, as MTAs usually have an option to allow non-authenticated
relaying.
where is this dokumented ?, what mta suppo
if that is entirely done in the postfix side dovecot could be stopped
and it will still work on the postfix side of it, if dovecot policy
service is down, postfix will not get the result from it, but it could
failback to check dovecot dict still with is used in postfixadmin,
I think the issue i
On 2021-07-31 19:28, darkc0de wrote:
So dovemon for Dovecot pro, but nothing for community?
https://github.com/brandond/poolmon
---
Tom
On 2021-07-29 20:13, dove...@ptld.com wrote:
It sounds like a better approach would be to make Dovecot reject any
email no matter what the size is (even size=0) if a user is over
quota. I'll take further discussion to the dovecot mailing list then.
If you are not aware, dovecot has by default a
So dovemon for Dovecot pro, but nothing for community?Sent from my Verizon,
Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: William Edwards
Date: 7/30/21 8:17 AM (GMT-07:00) To: Dan Conway
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re: Monitoring of
director back end nodes > Op 30 j
Hi,
Compiled GCC 4.7.4 with options:
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib
Compiled Dovecot v2.3.15 wih options:
export CC=/usr/local/gcc-4.7.4/bin/gcc
export CXX=/usr/local/gcc-4.7.4/bin/g++
./configure --prefix=/usr --with-ssl=openssl --with-ssldir=/etc/ssl
--sysconfdir=/etc --with-pam
On 31 July 2021 9.12.53 UTC, Joseph D Wagner wrote:
>I've seen documentation on using a SQL backend for quota dictionary and
>passdb&userdb dictionary. However, I can't find any examples of a SQL
>backend for IMAP METADATA / mail_attributes_dict.
>
>Is this combination possible? If so, is ther
I've seen documentation on using a SQL backend for quota dictionary and
passdb&userdb dictionary. However, I can't find any examples of a SQL
backend for IMAP METADATA / mail_attributes_dict.
Is this combination possible? If so, is there an example somewhere?
I am unsure what data structures it'