> On 16/09/2020 06:38 Mrinal Sharma wrote:
>
>
> I am trying to use a newly added Local Validation functionality in dovecot
> version 2.3.11. I am running dovecot inside a Docker container With base
> image " debian:buster-slim". When I try to login through below command , a
> crash is see
On 9/15/20 9:08 AM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> what additional/different config is required to get the sieve processor to
> *send* that email?
'redirect' was the wrong action for this case.
as was 'pipe'.
an 'execute :pipe' action does the trick.
this
report-spam.sieve
require
No, this is the mistake I did. The access token generated is based on RS256.
This issue can be closed. I have sent another mail wherein I see "Cannot load
key: Invalid dovecot key version".
Thank you for the Quick response.
Mrinal
-Original Message-
From: Aki Tuomi
Sent: Tuesday, Sep
I am trying to use a newly added Local Validation functionality in dovecot
version 2.3.11. I am running dovecot inside a Docker container With base
image " debian:buster-slim". When I try to login through below command , a
crash is seen. Algorithm Used is RS256 and certificate is self-signed.
On 9/15/2020 10:07 AM, Matej Tyc wrote:
On 14. 09. 20 22:46, Daniel Miller wrote:
On 9/14/2020 1:19 PM, Matej Tyc wrote:
...
When learning about how ACL work in e.g.
[...] so I can't use
it to reverse-engineer the correct syntax.
The global ACLs are...global. They apply to all matching m
> "Miloslav" == Miloslav Hůla writes:
Miloslav> Dne 10.09.2020 v 17:40 John Stoffel napsal(a):
So why not run the backend storage on the Netapp, and just keep the
indexes and such local to the system? I've run Netapps for many years
and they work really well. And then you'd g
On 14. 09. 20 22:46, Daniel Miller wrote:
On 9/14/2020 1:19 PM, Matej Tyc wrote:
...
When learning about how ACL work in e.g.
https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/plugin/acl/ - when one wishes to use
the Global ACL file, how does one link it to a particular user's
mailboxes? Examples that are li
> On 15/09/2020 19:39 Mrinal Sharma wrote:
>
>
> I am trying to use a newly added Local Validation functionality in dovecot
> version 2.3.11. I am running dovecot inside a Docker container With base
> image " debian:buster-slim". When I try to login through below command , a
> crash is s
I am trying to use a newly added Local Validation functionality in dovecot
version 2.3.11. I am running dovecot inside a Docker container With base
image " debian:buster-slim". When I try to login through below command , a
crash is seen.
'''
a1 login admin
eyJhbGci4zUxMiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ
i've installed
rpm -qa | grep dovecot
dovecot-2.3.10.1-1.fc32.x86_64
dovecot-pigeonhole-2.3.10.1-1.fc32.x86_64
i'm setting up imapsieve spam reporting; following,
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/spam_reporting/
https://wiki.dov
On 15.9.2020 9.40, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 14.9.2020 15.48, Carlos Mogas da Silva wrote:
>> Hi list!
>>
>> I have a CentOS 7 server running dovecot with GSSAPI auth enabled. Version
>> 2.3.10 was working fine
>> but after the upgrade to 2.3.11 it stopped working. On thing I see on the
>> logs is
Dne 15.09.2020 v 10:22 Linda A. Walsh napsal(a):
On 2020/09/10 07:40, Miloslav Hůla wrote:
I cannot verify it, but I think that even JBOD is propagated as a
virtual device. If you create JBOD from 3 different disks, low level
parameters may differ.
JBOD allows each disk to be seen by
On 2020.09.15. 11:22, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
On 2020/09/10 07:40, Miloslav Hůla wrote:
I cannot verify it, but I think that even JBOD is propagated as a
virtual device. If you create JBOD from 3 different disks, low level
parameters may differ.
JBOD allows each disk to be seen by the O
Dne 10.09.2020 v 17:40 John Stoffel napsal(a):
So why not run the backend storage on the Netapp, and just keep the
indexes and such local to the system? I've run Netapps for many years
and they work really well. And then you'd get automatic backups using
schedule snapshots.
Keep the index file
On 2020/09/10 07:40, Miloslav Hůla wrote:
I cannot verify it, but I think that even JBOD is propagated as a
virtual device. If you create JBOD from 3 different disks, low level
parameters may differ.
JBOD allows each disk to be seen by the OS, as is. You wouldn't
create JBOD disk fr
15 matches
Mail list logo