SV: SV: Marking all emails in "Trash" as opened, and also prohibiting email clients from creating ne

2020-05-09 Thread Sebastian Nielsen
Doesn't work in Samsung Email still. And with COPY FLAG set, it doesn't work with outlook either. You need APPEND for it to work in outlook. It currently works in outlook with either no causes restriction, or with COPY FLAG APPEND. But not in Samsung Email. And what I understand, leaving .causes

Re: SV: Marking all emails in "Trash" as opened, and also prohibiting email clients from creating new ma

2020-05-09 Thread Mark Constable
On 10/5/20 3:33 am, Sebastian Nielsen wrote: And then this in plugins.conf: plugin { sieve_plugins = sieve_imapsieve imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Trash imapsieve_mailbox1_before = file:/etc/dovecot/sieve/trash.sieve } Maybe adding this will help... imapsieve_mailbox1_causes = COPY FLAG

Re: Unable to disable TLSv1.3 or fallback to TLSv1.2 when 1 cipher is disabled

2020-05-09 Thread Steve Egbert
I have an operational need to disable TLSv1.3 due to inadequate support to exclude certain ciphers. There is no need to disable TLSv1.3 and attempts to do so will be flagged as “downgrade attacks”. Let us ignore TLSv1.2 as a downgrade option. And focus on TLSv1.3 for its entirety of this th

Re: Support for MULTISEARCH

2020-05-09 Thread Peter
Am 10.05.20 um 00:22 schrieb Daniel Miller: Thank you - I'm aware of the virtual folder option and do use it. My interest is for a Windows client, EM Client, which I otherwise really enjoy. Unfortunately, they've implemented server-side searching only via MULTISEARCH - for reasons passing my un

Re[2]: Support for MULTISEARCH

2020-05-09 Thread Daniel Miller
Thank you - I'm aware of the virtual folder option and do use it. My interest is for a Windows client, EM Client, which I otherwise really enjoy. Unfortunately, they've implemented server-side searching only via MULTISEARCH - for reasons passing my understanding. So I was hoping to hear Dovecot

Dovecot v2.3.4.1 Debian 10.3 mbox format - Error: chdir(/var/spool/mail/domain/user) failed: Not a directory

2020-05-09 Thread vik
Hi colleagues, I am trying to setup dovecot and have a strange problem. I configured it to: #dovecot -n|grep ^mail mail_gid = mail mail_location = mbox:/var/spool/mail/%d/mailboxes/%n:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%d/%n mail_uid = mail And also setup exim4 to use it. I sent a test message and obse

SV: Marking all emails in "Trash" as opened, and also prohibiting email clients from creating new ma

2020-05-09 Thread Sebastian Nielsen
Another problem, is that running discard; on the Sent folder, just marks the email for deletion - ergo it gets a strike-through. It doesn't get deleted. Tried with both Before and After. Otherwise, the discard; on Sent folder works fine - ergo it only selects emails that were written through IMAP,

SV: Marking all emails in "Trash" as opened, and also prohibiting email clients from creating new ma

2020-05-09 Thread Sebastian Nielsen
I tried with following: require ["imap4flags"]; if not hasflag :is "\\Seen" { setflag "\\Seen"; } And then this in plugins.conf: plugin { sieve_plugins = sieve_imapsieve imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Trash imapsieve_mailbox1_before = file:/etc/dovecot/sieve/trash.sieve } It works in outlook,

RE: Marking all emails in "Trash" as opened, and also prohibiting email clients from creating new mails

2020-05-09 Thread Marc Roos
Someone just told me about imapsieve. Sieve rules for folders. I assume that could solve your issue. https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve -Original Message- Sent: 09 May 2020 17:32 To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Marking all emails in "Trash" as opened, and also prohibitin

Marking all emails in "Trash" as opened, and also prohibiting email clients from creating new mails

2020-05-09 Thread Sebastian Nielsen
Dovecot version: 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b) (pkg shipped by: Ubuntu-Desktop 20.04) I want to accomplish 2 things in dovecot: 1: I want to force all mails inside Trash to have an "opened"/"read" flag and "Non-Recent" flag. Basically Status: RO This regardless how the flag appears, either by copying/movin

Re: ot: copy physical mail files ?

2020-05-09 Thread Richard Siddall
Voytek Eymont wrote: dumb question warning: I have two email accounts, me@tld1 and me@tld2 often, get emails intended (by me) for me@tld2 sent to me@tld1 this is purely for my own preferred record keeping preference, as I run the server, is it 'a really bad things' if I simply copy relevant ma

converting old uucp buffer files to maildir

2020-05-09 Thread Michael Hirmke
Hi *, besides my dovecot maildir structure, that has been migrated from an Exchange server, I have an even older mail structure in an ancient uucp style. The program named CrossPoint I used for this isn't wideley known, but it used so called mpuffer files in a plain text format. It is the program

Re: Ms Exchange vs dovecot

2020-05-09 Thread Michael Hirmke
Hi Marc, >I have recently been working/testing with exchange 2016 and started >thinking if I should even migrate to this platform. I assume more people >here have experience with exchange and this idea. I was an Exchange admin for years and even had an Exchange server at home for about 20 years -

RE: Ms Exchange vs dovecot

2020-05-09 Thread Christian Kivalo
On May 9, 2020 1:21:09 PM GMT+02:00, Marc Roos wrote: > > >I was wondering about the sieve rules, because I thought they were >executed during mail delivery in the lmtp process. You can also 'guess' > >this a bit from syntax of the rules or the single file they are stored >in. Thus if you 'dr

RE: Ms Exchange vs dovecot

2020-05-09 Thread Marc Roos
I was wondering about the sieve rules, because I thought they were executed during mail delivery in the lmtp process. You can also 'guess' this a bit from syntax of the rules or the single file they are stored in. Thus if you 'drag' messages between folders, they are not executed. Off topic

Re: Ms Exchange vs dovecot

2020-05-09 Thread MIhai Badici
First of all, Exchange is a complete solution. Dovecot is a imap/pop3 server ( a good one, sure... ) So replacing exchange means to find an integrated solution. about the questions: public folder was removed in exchange. IMHO they made the right choice :) There is a different thing, need dif

RE: Ms Exchange vs dovecot

2020-05-09 Thread Marc Roos
My, my, did not expect this discussion. It is our own fault we are stuck with google and microsoft monopolies. If small companies would combine effort (resources and cash) and would not reinvent/create the wheel constantly on our own little islands, we would have much better products. So resp

Re: Ms Exchange vs dovecot

2020-05-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 08 May 2020, at 19:02, Eric Broch wrote: > Microsoft and Bill Gates are like inoperable tumors. Your outdated knee-jerking is entirely off-topic. Please find a political list if you want to continue your screed. -- The way I see it, the longer I put it off, the better it'll end up

Re: What's a Reasonable Inbox Size?

2020-05-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 08 May 2020, at 12:54, a...@globalchangemusic.org wrote: >> It depends on what you consider reasonable. >> >> The processing time of file operation that iterates through a mailbox >> will generally go up proportinately with size. If you do a text search >> without some indexing system like Sol

Re: Unable to disable TLSv1.3 or fallback to TLSv1.2 when 1 cipher is disabled

2020-05-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 08 May 2020, at 09:43, Steve Egbert wrote: > I have an operational need to disable TLSv1.3 due to inadequate support to > exclude certain ciphers. There is no need to disable TLSv1.3 and attempts to do so will be flagged as “downgrade attacks”. > Much to my dismay, the `ssl_protocols` had b

Re: ot: copy physical mail files ?

2020-05-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 07 May 2020, at 23:15, Voytek Eymont wrote: > hmmm, I use Squirrel web mail, don't have mail client, except on phone > (maybe Android mail client can do...? not sure, must check) Squiirrelmail has been abandoned for many years and hasn’t seen significant updates in about a decade. It does not