Yes, the second time it obviously runs very very fast ( under 1 sec ), but I
wanted to compare indexing speeds when there is no index present. Anyone has
some numbers ?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:37 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 18.04.2018 09:21, Qmail wrote:
Hi, have two quick questions:
I am re-
On 18.04.2018 09:21, Qmail wrote:
> Hi, have two quick questions:
>
> I am re-indexing some large mailboxes and I wanted to get some
> opinions on these speeds. I ran a random sort command on an unindexed
> mailbox in order to get it to index. Results, for a mailbox with 10GB
> Inbox, spread in 6
Hi, have two quick questions:
I am re-indexing some large mailboxes and I wanted to get some opinions on
these speeds. I ran a random sort command on an unindexed mailbox in order to
get it to index. Results, for a mailbox with 10GB Inbox, spread in 65 000 files:
3 UID SORT (ARRIVAL) US-ASCII OR
Le 17/04/2018 à 14:18, kfx a écrit :
> dovecot 2.2.34
> solr 7.2
>
> I only see new messages after typing on the server "doveadm fts rescan
> -u username" though I've followed the wiki and added "fts_autoindex =
> yes" in 90-plugin.conf . Subsequent search for the same pattern always
> gives the sa
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:04:56PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 17.04.2018 um 19:00 schrieb Ulrich Zehl:
> > Sending (in my case: forwarding) messages from Sieve via sendmail does not
> > work with version 2.3.1.
>
> https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-April/111482.html
Thanks, Alexa
I use dovecot-lda to deliver incoming email from Exim to Dovecot.
After having some problems with email bounces with empty envelope sender
not being delivered because of an empty -f argument, I discovered that
Exim can pass email to Dovecot using dovecot-lda without using the -f
argument at al
Guys/Aki,
Someone please respond.
Regards
DP
From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of DurgaPrasad
- DatasoftComnet
Sent: 17 April 2018 10:46
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Corrupted dbox file around offset= EOF reading msg header
Hello Dovecoters,
I am us
Am 17.04.2018 um 19:00 schrieb Ulrich Zehl:
Sending (in my case: forwarding) messages from Sieve via sendmail does not
work with version 2.3.1.
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-April/111482.html
[ ... ]
Ulrich
Alexander
Sending (in my case: forwarding) messages from Sieve via sendmail does not
work with version 2.3.1.
I have narrowed it down to this simple test case:
# dovecot -n
# 2.3.1 (c5a5c0c82): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 4.4.0-119-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS
# Hostname: tuxi.topfen.net
fi
Here it is:
# 2.2.34 (874deae): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7)
# OS: Linux 4.4.127 x86_64 Debian 9.4 ext3
# Hostname: server00
auth_master_user_separator = *
auth_mechanisms = plain login
default_client_limit = 3
default_process_limit = 6000
default_vsz_lim
dovecot 2.2.34
solr 7.2
I only see new messages after typing on the server "doveadm fts rescan
-u username" though I've followed the wiki and added "fts_autoindex =
yes" in 90-plugin.conf . Subsequent search for the same pattern always
gives the same result, ignoring new emails with that particula
On 17.04.18 13:11, Reio Remma wrote:
On 17.04.18 12:40, Reio Remma wrote:
On 17.04.18 12:38, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 17.04.2018 12:36, Reio Remma wrote:
Hello!
I noticed SpamAssassin *spamc* usage has entered the documentation
at https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve
I'm wonderi
On 17.04.18 12:40, Reio Remma wrote:
On 17.04.18 12:38, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 17.04.2018 12:36, Reio Remma wrote:
Hello!
I noticed SpamAssassin *spamc* usage has entered the documentation
at https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve
I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in sa-lea
On 17.04.18 12:38, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 17.04.2018 12:36, Reio Remma wrote:
Hello!
I noticed SpamAssassin *spamc* usage has entered the documentation at
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve
I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in sa-learn-ham.sh should
use revoke instead
On 17.04.2018 12:36, Reio Remma wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I noticed SpamAssassin *spamc* usage has entered the documentation at
> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve
>
> I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in sa-learn-ham.sh should use
> revoke instead of report for --ham messages?
>
Hello!
I noticed SpamAssassin *spamc* usage has entered the documentation at
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve
I'm wondering if the -C (report) option in sa-learn-ham.sh should use
revoke instead of report for --ham messages?
I started using imapsieve with spamc myself just
16 matches
Mail list logo