Re: Filesystem level backups?

2018-04-08 Thread chaouche yacine
Been rsyncing my whole /var/vmail subdir (virtual users) for a while. So far so good. Yassine. On Sunday, April 8, 2018, 11:56:29 PM GMT+1, Steve Atkins wrote: Up until now I've been backing up my IMAP server by taking an atomic snapshot of the entire VM, so I've not really had to w

Filesystem level backups?

2018-04-08 Thread Steve Atkins
Up until now I've been backing up my IMAP server by taking an atomic snapshot of the entire VM, so I've not really had to worry about it. I'm moving to hosting where I have neither VM snapshots nor a filesystem that can take snapshots, so I need to think about consistent backups a bit more. Wil

Re: lda fails in parse_angle_addr if sieve is enabled

2018-04-08 Thread Bernard Spil
Hi all, Reverted back to 2.2.34 and pigeonhole 0.4.22 and (after reverting config changes) it's working again including Sieve. I was notified of commit https://github.com/stephanbosch/dovecot-core/commit/6553f20bb31b5f0eebb73a0db526f00816b47d71 which I'll try. It's in a different option -f (not -

lda fails in parse_angle_addr if sieve is enabled

2018-04-08 Thread Bernard Spil
Hi, Since updating to 2.3.1 on my FreeBSD mailserver mail delivery using lda is broken if I have sieve enabled. (Before updating this was 2.2 and pigeonhole 0.4) FreeBSD 11.1-p8 amd64 Dovecot 2.3.1 Pigeonhole 0.5.1 Mailflow is OpenSMTPd as MTA, using mda delivery to rspamc which utlimately deliv

Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors

2018-04-08 Thread Reuben Farrelly
Hi, [Formatting is a bit rough, replying from a trimmed digest email] Message: 1 Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:04:35 +0200 From: Michael Grimm To: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Reuben Farrell

Re: changed behavior for dovecot-lda in 2.3.x

2018-04-08 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 4/7/2018 om 10:16 PM schreef Martin Waschbüsch: > Hi all, > > Hey all, I upgraded to dovecot 2.3.1 (from 2.2.34) and noticed that the > behavior for dovecot-lda changed. Apparently it no longer accepts -f "" or -f > "<>? > With 2.2.34, both were accepted now I get: > > root@mail:~# /usr/local/