On August 7, 2017, at 2:56pm, Michael Slusarz wrote:
This is the RFC 5256 compliant behavior.? From is sorted on addr-mailbox.?
Interesting.
I can't be the only person who's found this to be a limitation, right?
It would be very useful to sort by actual sender, not just to group all
the mi
On 04.08.2017 23:10, Daniel Miller wrote:
> On 8/4/2017 12:48 PM, Daniel Miller wrote:
>> On 8/3/2017 6:11 AM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02.08.2017 23:35, Daniel Miller wrote:
Is there explicit documentation available for the (probably trivial)
configuration needed for Dovecot an
On 07.08.2017 20:28, Stefan Hagen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed a strange behavor, where I would like to ask for help.
>
> I have set up a few virtual mailboxes using the Virtual plugin.
> These mailboxes are:
> - Unread (all undread in all mailboxes)
> - LastDay (last 24h of all mailboxes)
> -
On 08.08.2017 10:17, Armin Tüting wrote:
> quota-status.c: In function ‘client_handle_request’:
> quota-status.c:98:10: warning: passing argument 4 of
> ‘message_detail_address_parse’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled
> by default]
> &detail);
> ^
> In file included from
Hi
Sounds a bit less good. If you only have one server now, then
partitioning out by function will probably be *much* easier.
Everything except dovecot is very easy to spread out across
servers, so to take the easy route I would probably keep dovecot
where it is, and spread out the other functio
quota-status.c: In function ‘client_handle_request’:
quota-status.c:98:10: warning: passing argument 4 of
‘message_detail_address_parse’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled
by default]
&detail);
^
In file included from quota-status.c:14:0:
../../../src/lib-mail/message-addre
