Re: NOTIFY broken in 2.2.31?

2017-06-30 Thread Bojan Smojver
On 1 July 2017 1:09:31 AM AEST, Timo Sirainen wrote: >I was writing some further tests for NOTIFY, and looks like I >misunderstood the RFC and wrote broken tests. Then I thought that >NOTIFY had been broken for years, but actually I just broke it only in >v2.2.31 :( Just revert this patch and it

uid '0' from fts_solr?

2017-06-30 Thread Larry Rosenman
I'm getting lots of: Jun 30 14:41:34 thebighonker dovecot: imap(ler/14135): Error: fts_solr: received invalid uid '0' in my logs. Ideas? doveconf -n: # 2.2.31 (65cde28): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.19 (e5c7051) # OS: FreeBSD 11.1-BETA2 amd64 auth_default_realm

Re: Auth Policy Server

2017-06-30 Thread Aki Tuomi
> On June 30, 2017 at 10:24 PM Daniel Miller wrote: > > > On 6/30/2017 12:05 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On June 30, 2017 at 9:49 PM Daniel Miller wrote: > >> > >> > >> I've made a preliminary auth policy server in Perl - and it sort of > >> works (mostly) - but I've got some questions on "prope

Re: Auth Policy Server

2017-06-30 Thread Daniel Miller
On 6/30/2017 12:05 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: On June 30, 2017 at 9:49 PM Daniel Miller wrote: I've made a preliminary auth policy server in Perl - and it sort of works (mostly) - but I've got some questions on "proper" implementation. Hi! First of all, which version are you running, and can you

Re: Auth Policy Server

2017-06-30 Thread Aki Tuomi
> On June 30, 2017 at 9:49 PM Daniel Miller wrote: > > > I've made a preliminary auth policy server in Perl - and it sort of > works (mostly) - but I've got some questions on "proper" implementation. > > It appears the communication is HTTP based - is the intent to talk to a > "proper" webse

Auth Policy Server

2017-06-30 Thread Daniel Miller
I've made a preliminary auth policy server in Perl - and it sort of works (mostly) - but I've got some questions on "proper" implementation. It appears the communication is HTTP based - is the intent to talk to a "proper" webserver, or is a simple dedicated daemon appropriate (which is what I

Re: Sieve can't move messages in a public namespace

2017-06-30 Thread Paolo
Il 30/06/2017 17:44, Alex JOST ha scritto: I think the :create command requires 'mailbox'. require ["fileinto","mailbox"]; Ops! Sorry. The :create clause was added after googling, but it didn't work. The problem is the same without ":create". The two mailboxes "Ricevuta" and "Inviata"

Re: Sieve can't move messages in a public namespace

2017-06-30 Thread Alex JOST
Am 30.06.2017 um 10:46 schrieb Paolo: Hello, my dovecot version is 2.1.17 I've configured some public namespaces (config attached). When a mail arrives at a certain mail address, that mail is handled by dovecot lmtp server and a sieve script is executed that shuold move the message in one of

Re: NOTIFY broken in 2.2.31?

2017-06-30 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 29 Jun 2017, at 13.27, Bojan Smojver wrote: > > Hi, > > I just updated my Dovecot to the new build in Fedora 26, which is based > on 2.2.31. After I did that, Evolution (3.24.3) is no longer receiving > notifications about new mail in folders other than inbox (the same > version of Evo that w

Re: dovecot 2.2.31: linking error

2017-06-30 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 29 Jun 2017, at 13.32, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > > -std=gnu99 > -mmacosx-version-min=10.12 > [...] > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: > "_imapc_client_cmd", referenced from: > _imapc_quota_refresh in quota-imapc.o > "_imapc_client_get_capabilities", referenced from: > _imapc_quota_re

Sieve can't move messages in a public namespace

2017-06-30 Thread Paolo
Hello, my dovecot version is 2.1.17 I've configured some public namespaces (config attached). When a mail arrives at a certain mail address, that mail is handled by dovecot lmtp server and a sieve script is executed that shuold move the message in one of the namespaces. This is the script:

Re: imapc making too any connections

2017-06-30 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 29 Jun 2017, at 18.44, van der Kamp, John wrote: > > Hi, > > I was testing around with 2.2.31, and saw that it made new extra connections > to the backend imap server whenever you make a new mailbox. > So client does: > > A001 login username password > A002 create subfolder > > Previously,

Re: Per-user quota (passwd)

2017-06-30 Thread Evgeniy Korneechev
Our solution: userdb { args = /etc/imap.passwd driver = passwd-file override_fields = home=/var/vmail/glu_vrem/%u } userdb { driver = passwd override_fields = home=/var/vmail/glu_vrem/%u } Users with non-standard quota in passwd-file: >> administrator:*:95400500:95400513:Administrato