On 04/03/17 04:07, David Mehler wrote:
With the web it was easy just let apache serve the token that
letsencrypt needed and I got certificates. How do I do this with
regards email?
I know there have been some answers to this already but FWIW I use
dehydrated directly from Github and this script
Thanks. Is there another way of doing this? I've got a web server
running on 80 and 443. Are there any other options?
I'm getting this list in digest mode, so it's possible by the time this
gets to you, I will have repeated someone else' suggestion.
In this situation, where your dovecot serve
You can either drop the authentication token into /.wellknown on your
running server, or take down the server for a minute to run certbot
every couple months.
I'm not a fan of symlinks out of config directories and certainly not
across chroot / jail boundaries so I manually copy the certs into th
David Mehler writes:
I'm wanting letsencrypt to take over as my CA, replacing existing self
signed certificates. I've got web working, a certificate for https
sites and one for webmail as they have different names. What I'm now
wanting to do is get letsencrypt going for my email setup, the smt
Hello,
Have you considered running getssl bash script?
It is well documented, self-updates automatically, supports https,
imaps, pop3s, ... and can push validation tokens to your web server
using rsync, ftp, ...
See https://github.com/srvrco/getssl/blob/master/README.md
Cheers
On 03/03/2017 08
Yes:
I'm using the acme.sh client, and I can do:
> acme.sh --issue --standalone -d example.com --httpport 88
It does what you'd expect: it runs using a small webserver on port 88
I only just discovered that option myself :-)
MJ
On 03/03/2017 08:22 PM, David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
Thanks. Is
Hello,
Thanks. Is there another way of doing this? I've got a web server
running on 80 and 443. Are there any other options?
Thanks.
Dave.
On 3/3/17, Michael Neurohr wrote:
> On 2017-03-03 19:07, David Mehler wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I know some users here are using letsencrypt for their CA. If
On 2017-03-03 19:07, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know some users here are using letsencrypt for their CA. If this is
> to off topic write me privately.
>
> I'm wanting letsencrypt to take over as my CA, replacing existing self
> signed certificates. I've got web working, a certificate for
You can also setup web server to handle auth for particular domain or
use certbot's standalone auth, but in that case, 80 or 443 port must be
free to allow certbot's temporary web server to run on that port.
--
KSB
On 2017.03.03. 20:08, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I have DNS setup as my auth, and
Hello,
Thanks, should have mentioned dns tokens are not possible in my situation.
Thanks.
Dave.
On 3/3/17, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I have DNS setup as my auth, and use nsupdate to let it get the token.
>
>
>
> On 3/3/17, 12:07 PM, "dovecot on behalf of David Mehler"
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
Hello,
Perms are 775 on that folder.
If you've got a working configuration can you do a doveconf -n and let
me see it? I'd like to compare yours to mine.
And if you've got a working welcome script i'd like to see that as well.
Thanks.
Dave.
On 3/3/17, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 2017-03-02 (17:51 MS
I have DNS setup as my auth, and use nsupdate to let it get the token.
On 3/3/17, 12:07 PM, "dovecot on behalf of David Mehler"
wrote:
Hello,
I know some users here are using letsencrypt for their CA. If this is
to off topic write me privately.
I'm wanting letsencry
Hello,
I know some users here are using letsencrypt for their CA. If this is
to off topic write me privately.
I'm wanting letsencrypt to take over as my CA, replacing existing self
signed certificates. I've got web working, a certificate for https
sites and one for webmail as they have different
Il 23/02/2017 23:08, Mark Moseley ha scritto:
As someone who is about to begin the process of moving from maildir to
mdbox on NFS (and therefore just about to start the 'director-ization' of
everything) for ~6.5m mailboxes, I'm curious if anyone can share any
experiences with it. The list is surp
Wow, Teemu, it sounds great
I am looking forward to seeing this point in your roadmap working.
Thanks for the update.
Sergio Bastián Rodríguez
Arquitectura y servicios de red
Tlf.: +34 984 19 12 65
Fax: +34 984 19 10 01
Móvil: +34 684 69 63 09
Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Gijón
P
Hello Alessio, thanks for the information.
This is the default information in Bytes in all logout POP session. In think
that in the login we haven't anything about size information, at least I
haven't found out any option on 20-pop3.conf file.
But, is possible to have this info in IMAP sessions?
Hello Steffen,
Dovecot version: v2.2.13
It seems there is no problem on mail reception step when piped through
dovecot.
However, running it afterwards is another story. SpamAssassin is run as
debian-spamd and thus has its information stored in its own environment
(isolation).
As an exemple, if y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Bernard wrote:
On 01/03/2017 11:27, Bernard wrote:
Hello,
I am new to the list. /Waving at everyone/
I got a basic SpamAssassin working on a Debian setup (w/ debian-spamd
user), running as a Postfix transport.
I am currently
Hi,
I'm configuring a farm of dovecot proxies redirecting users to backend
servers. The decision of which backend server is used for a user is
based in its ldap account information.
In my previous configuration I was using an inherited director
configuration in these proxy servers, but now
i recently had this problem. i am using centos 7. maybe these links
will help you
i reverted to the old antispam plugin as a package from
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cottsay/dovecot-antispam/
plus this to help configure
http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic8169-iredmail-support-antis
On 2017-03-03 13:22, Jakob Curdes wrote:
Hello, we have a centos 6 server running dovecot 2.0 provided with the
OS, currently 2.0.9. We would like to upgrade to the 2.2.19 package
provided by the mailserver.guru repo. I read the upgrading docs for
2.1 and 2.2 and found the following issues:
On 2017-03-03 10:26, Bernard wrote:
No help there?
---
Bernard
On 01/03/2017 11:27, Bernard wrote:
Hello,
I am new to the list. /Waving at everyone/
I got a basic SpamAssassin working on a Debian setup (w/ debian-spamd
user), running as a Postfix transport.
I am currently trying to switch
On 2017-03-03 10:42, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
I could have several password databases in dovecot. And according
to http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase these passwdbs could allow
or deny users and they could have different result_failure and
result_sucess behaviors. So the order
Hello, we have a centos 6 server running dovecot 2.0 provided with the
OS, currently 2.0.9. We would like to upgrade to the 2.2.19 package
provided by the mailserver.guru repo. I read the upgrading docs for 2.1
and 2.2 and found the following issues:
2.0 - 2.1:
- define namespace inbox or dele
Den 03.03.2017 09.42, skrev Angel L. Mateo:
Hello,
I could have several password databases in dovecot. And according to
http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase these passwdbs could allow or
deny users and they could have different result_failure and
result_sucess behaviors. So the order in
Hello,
I could have several password databases in dovecot. And according to
http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase these passwdbs could allow or
deny users and they could have different result_failure and
result_sucess behaviors. So the order in which they are evaluated may be
significant.
No help there?
---
Bernard
On 01/03/2017 11:27, Bernard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to the list. /Waving at everyone/
>
> I got a basic SpamAssassin working on a Debian setup (w/ debian-spamd
> user), running as a Postfix transport.
>
> I am currently trying to switch it to a dovecot plugin in or
27 matches
Mail list logo
