SIS: dovecot creates duplicated attachments (sometimes)

2016-05-15 Thread Alexander Moisseev
SIS deduplication was broken in 2.2.16 and has been fixed with https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/3b39022ea0513363241cf852b7d454c841584ea1 but still sometimes (just several times in a month or so) dovecot creates duplicated attachments. As you can see in directory listings below all attachm

Re: indexer-worker out of memory with vsz_limit=750 MB?!

2016-05-15 Thread aki . tuomi
> On May 15, 2016 at 2:48 PM Peer Heinlein > wrote: > > > > We're running 2.2.24 with fts_lucene and I wonder why indexer-working > can be out-of-memory even with > > vsz_limit=750 MB > > ?! > > Peer > > > May 15 12:14:51 dobby4 dovecot: indexer-worker(u...@example.com): Fatal: > pool_sy

Re: SSL on doveadm port

2016-05-15 Thread aki . tuomi
> On May 15, 2016 at 4:36 PM Patrick Domack wrote: > > > > I have been attempting to setup ssl on the doveadm port. So far this > works fine, as long as the global certificate is used. > > I wanted to use a different certificate, one that machines the machine > name, instead of the generi

SSL on doveadm port

2016-05-15 Thread Patrick Domack
I have been attempting to setup ssl on the doveadm port. So far this works fine, as long as the global certificate is used. I wanted to use a different certificate, one that machines the machine name, instead of the generic mail certificate, but I have not been able to figure out how to d

indexer-worker out of memory with vsz_limit=750 MB?!

2016-05-15 Thread Peer Heinlein
We're running 2.2.24 with fts_lucene and I wonder why indexer-working can be out-of-memory even with vsz_limit=750 MB ?! Peer May 15 12:14:51 dobby4 dovecot: indexer-worker(u...@example.com): Fatal: pool_system_realloc(134217728): Out of memory May 15 12:14:51 dobby4 dovecot: indexer-worker(u

FTS and autoindex in a cluster?

2016-05-15 Thread Peer Heinlein
In a dovecot replication cluster where both sides have fts_autoindex=yes we have a indexer-worker(u...@example.com): Indexed 1 messages in INBOX on BOTH sides. a) Is that okay because the duplicated message will be skipped or doesn't harm? b) Or should "autoindex" only be activated on one si

Re: name of mailbox of implicit keep (was Re: Sieve extension for testing for mailbox)

2016-05-15 Thread Stephan Bosch
Op 5/11/2016 om 8:34 PM schreef Jon Kristensen: > Steffen Kaiser writes: > >> On Tue, 10 May 2016, Jon Kristensen wrote: >> >>> Which Pigeonhole Sieve extension should I use to process/test a >>> message depending on whether the message is in a particular mailbox? >>> (Is it the mboxmetadata exten