also sprach Timo Sirainen [2015-11-21 14:14 +1300]:
> Well, your topic is PAM.
Is it? My point is that PAM should not even be asked if an
authentication source beforehand knows about a user but the password
cannot be verified.
> But.. Right now passdb has result_success, result_failure and
> res
On 17 Nov 2015, at 13:03, Anton Cheyvhchalov wrote:
>
>
> +1 to that idea.
>
> Ask the same couple month before during migration from 1.x to 2.x but got no
> answer from someone who able to change this.
Troublesome.. Probably nicest way to implement this would be to add a new
"maildir_lock_
> On 18 Nov 2015, at 23:00, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
>
>> Sounds more like you just introduced a new self-created problem that
> would require yet another workaround.. ;-)
>
> Definitely wrong.
>
> Appending .dir to directories and .folder to folder files keeps files
> completely distinct and
> On 17 Nov 2015, at 22:51, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> According to the wiki,¹ it's considered a feature of Dovecot and its
> ability to support multiple authentication sources that "if the
> password doesn't match in the first database, it checks the next
> one".
>
> ¹) http://w
