Hello,
I have few hundreds mailboxes in my installation using the lastest
version of dovecot. I have performances issues due to the storage don't
support the high flow of I/O.
I'm wondering if they are any chance to convert without downtime my
sdboxes mailboxes to mdbox.
Thanks in advance.
I'm contemplating using dsync with dovecot-2.2.10 (el7) and then transferring
the resulting mdbox files to a dovecot-2.0.9 (el6) server. Is the mdbox
format backwards compatible between the two versions?
Thanks,
Orion
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
At 6:14 PM +0100 12/11/14, Dominik Breu wrote:
i have a simple and maybe stupid question but,
read the guide on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync now i wonder
where to put this configuration ? May i oversee something but i would
appreciate any hint toward solving my problem.
Hi Domi
Here is my ugly solution for this:
static int plugin_mail_save_begin(
struct mail_save_context *context,
struct istream *input
) {
...
if (mbox->super.save_begin(context, input) < 0)
return -1;
output = scrambler_ostream_create(
context->data.output->real_stream->parent,
su
Well, I've found the bug. I've got confused with the stream-stacking
function pointers. The encryption istream was stacked on top of the
parent and the ostream below the parent. That caused this very confusing
bug.
Best,
Philipp
Am 11.12.2014 um 12:16 schrieb Philipp Brüll:
> Hello,
>
> I'm deve
Am 12.12.2014 um 14:45 schrieb David Davidov:
>> Yes, after an upgrade works fine.
>
> Hello,
>
> Unfortunately this issue hits again. I installed the latest stable
> version 2.2.15 and got the following error
>
> # doveadm expunge -u "^o^@dave.s484.qa-team.net" mailbox 'INBOX.Junk
> Mail' SAVE
> Yes, after an upgrade works fine.
Hello,
Unfortunately this issue hits again. I installed the latest stable
version 2.2.15 and got the following error
# doveadm expunge -u "^o^@dave.s484.qa-team.net" mailbox 'INBOX.Junk
Mail' SAVEDBEFORE 7d
doveadm(^o^@dave.s484.qa-team.net): Error: userdb
lo
Am 12.12.2014 um 13:59 schrieb Ovidiu Moldovan:
> Hello,
>
> I have some issues related with dsync when trying to perform two way
> synchronization between Cyrus and Dovecot.
>
> 1st time synchronization always works and email, folders, flags can be synced
> between these but once for example i
Hello,
I have some issues related with dsync when trying to perform two way
synchronization between Cyrus and Dovecot.
1st time synchronization always works and email, folders, flags can be synced
between these but once for example in dovecot side the user creates a folder,
dsync fails with th
Sorry, I haven't shut users.
I simply copied data between two folders
>Messaggio originale
>Da: absolutely_f...@libero.it
>Data: 12/12/2014 13.14
>A:
>Ogg: R: Re: R: Re: Duplicate messages
>
>Hi,
>
>I mounted both network storage on this server.
>After that, I used:
>
># nice -n 19 rsyn
Hi,
I mounted both network storage on this server.
After that, I used:
# nice -n 19 rsync -av --progress /mnt/old/domains/* /var/spool/pop/domains/
>Messaggio originale
>Da: skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de
>Data: 12/12/2014 12.01
>A: "absolutely_f...@libero.it"
>Cc:
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: Dupl
Hi there,
Other auth modules (eg passwd-file) allow a username_format to be
specified, but not the PAM module.
The use-case, is where I want a static userdb configuration which takes the
domain into account but still want to use PAM for authentication, eg:
userdb {
driver = static
args = uid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote:
with rsync
would you be more specific:
which command line, how did you shut users out etc.pp.
Messaggio originale
Da: skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de
Data: 12/12/2014 9.44
A: "absolu
Hi Steffen,
with rsync
Thank you
>Messaggio originale
>Da: skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de
>Data: 12/12/2014 9.44
>A: "absolutely_f...@libero.it"
>Cc:
>Ogg: Re: Duplicate messages
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote:
>
On 12/11/2014 08:49 PM, Andy Dills wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion. I checked the output of doveconf, and by default
> it appears the vsz_limit is set to
> 18446744073709551615B for each of the services, and 256M for
> default_vsz_limit.
>
> I checked a user in question, and their index.cach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, absolutely_f...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
I just moved mail spool to a different network storage.
Now, several users are complaining about duplicate message that are fetched by
their clients (Outlook, Microsoft Outlook).
What is the
Hi,
I just moved mail spool to a different network storage.
Now, several users are complaining about duplicate message that are fetched by
their clients (Outlook, Microsoft Outlook).
What is the reason?
This is my conf:
# dovecot -n
# 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x8
17 matches
Mail list logo
