-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Greg Rivers wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 12/24/2013 2:15 PM, klondike wrote:
The relevant lines for the test e-mail I sent are these:
sieve: info: started log at Dec 24 13:37:23.
main script: line 9: in
On 2014-02-14 05:49, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Sounds like you don't want the master user to be special in any way now or in
future. In that case setting master_user=%u would do exactly that now and
always. (There might be some other features besides ACLs that could work
differently for master use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, vupibi wrote:
I tried several settings, but I dont get it running.
I don't see any namespace configuration in your doveconf output. Do you
change the correct files and did you reloaded Dovecot?
What I tried is adding this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Фадеев Виталий Львович wrote:
Return-path: <"vita...@bbb.com"@host.aaa.com>
Envelope-to: vita...@bbb.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:59:17 -0600
Received: from xxx.net ([11.22.33.44] helo=[192.168.1.77])
by host.aaa.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, matthias lay wrote:
I experienced that if a Mailaddress matches several users the delivery is
aborted.
dovecot: auth: Error: ldap(christian.t...@securepoint.de): LDAP search
returned multiple entries
dovecot:
On 14/02/14 15:49, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 14/02/14 15:39, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 14.2.2014, at 13.32, Steven Haigh wrote:
>>
>>> Looking further into this, it seems like the file has been compressed twice:
>>>
>>> This doesn't seem right for mail that has been sent, or moved from the
>>> inb
There's no good way to do this with passwd userdb. It would have to be some
kind of a new exclude list of users, which is a rather annoying special feature
to implement.
On 13.2.2014, at 17.24, Daniel Stoye wrote:
> I'm using PAM with padl_pam as a backend to get the users from an ldap
> serve
On 13.2.2014, at 16.37, Peter Mogensen wrote:
> On 2014-02-13 04:40, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 9.2.2014, at 17.36, Peter Mogensen wrote:
>>> But why is the master_user authn-id used in the ACLs and not the authz-id
>>> (requested-login-user) ?
>>>
>>> Isn't the whole point of SASL authz-id se
On 14/02/14 15:39, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 14.2.2014, at 13.32, Steven Haigh wrote:
>
>> Looking further into this, it seems like the file has been compressed twice:
>>
>> This doesn't seem right for mail that has been sent, or moved from the
>> inbox to the trash folder...
>>
>> Is it possib
On 14.2.2014, at 5.15, Peter Chiochetti wrote:
> Can I override the user parameter in solr indexing and searching?
No, and I think that would the wrong solution for this, because it would have
to be repeated for everything in Dovecot that uses username as part of the
mailbox identifier.
> To
On 14.2.2014, at 13.32, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Looking further into this, it seems like the file has been compressed twice:
>
> This doesn't seem right for mail that has been sent, or moved from the
> inbox to the trash folder...
>
> Is it possible that when the mail is moved between folders, it
On 14.2.2014, at 11.18, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 13/02/14 4:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.12.tar.gz
>> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.12.tar.gz.sig
>>
>> POP3 server code changes rarely, so I haven't spent time adding automated
> > testing
On 14/02/14 15:20, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I recently turned on IMAP zlib compression for Maildir and noticed that
> I've started getting these errors in the maillog.
>
> Error: Cached message size larger than expected (1627 > 1548)
> Error: Maildir filename has wrong S value, renamed
Hi guys,
I recently turned on IMAP zlib compression for Maildir and noticed that
I've started getting these errors in the maillog.
Error: Cached message size larger than expected (1627 > 1548)
Error: Maildir filename has wrong S value, renamed the file from
/home/crc.id.au/netwiz/.System Generate
On 13/02/14 4:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.12.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.12.tar.gz.sig
POP3 server code changes rarely, so I haven't spent time adding automated
> testing for it. So of course now that it changed in v2.1.11 there
On 8.2.2014, at 4.53, Jani Hast wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I though this bug should be reported, although there is workaround already
> made and in use.
>
> Dovecot 2.2.10 crashes into out of memory error when there is defined system
> users (userdb+passdb) and own virtual users (userdb+passdb). Rem
On 13/02/14 22:43, Alan Chandler wrote:
Hi
I am trying to achieve the following functionality
"usera" can't login because his account is set non active. there is a
deny query that checks this.
a master user ("masteruser") should be able login using
"usera*masteruser" syntax to this disable
Hi
I am trying to achieve the following functionality
"usera" can't login because his account is set non active. there is a
deny query that checks this.
a master user ("masteruser") should be able login using
"usera*masteruser" syntax to this disabled account
I just tried it with auth_deb
Am 2014-02-13 21:15, schrieb PCh:
Please advise:
Can I override the user parameter in solr indexing and searching?
To understand, why I wish for that, please consider my setup:
# Mail is fetched from a remote imap server
# dovecot LDA stores into Maildir as system user
# Several virtual users
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.12.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.12.tar.gz.sig
POP3 server code changes rarely, so I haven't spent time adding automated
testing for it. So of course now that it changed in v2.1.11 there was a bug
that caused it to crash most of th
Please advise:
Can I override the user parameter in solr indexing and searching?
To understand, why I wish for that, please consider my setup:
# Mail is fetched from a remote imap server
# dovecot LDA stores into Maildir as system user
# Several virtual users exist in a static userdb
# They al
Hello again. I have my virtual users working now. Postfix delivers
mail, and dovecot retrieves it for pop and imap users in the virtual
user database. Just one more thing though, it is understood that
dovecot is going to ask pam to check first for a unix account, which
will fail, then doveco
Am 13.02.2014 19:40, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 13.02.2014 19:28, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>
>> Am 13.02.2014 19:19, schrieb Mark Sapiro:
>>> Teemu Huovila wrote:
Please find attached a patch that addresses this problem. Apply on top of
2.2.11 sources with hg import
.
>>>
>>> T
Am 13.02.2014 19:28, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 13.02.2014 19:19, schrieb Mark Sapiro:
>> Teemu Huovila wrote:
>>> Please find attached a patch that addresses this problem. Apply on top of
>>> 2.2.11 sources with hg import
>>> .
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. I had encountered the pop3 segfaul
Am 13.02.2014 19:19, schrieb Mark Sapiro:
> Teemu Huovila wrote:
>> Please find attached a patch that addresses this problem. Apply on top of
>> 2.2.11 sources with hg import
>> .
>
> Thanks for the patch. I had encountered the pop3 segfault issue immediately
> after upgrade to 2.2.11 and reve
Teemu Huovila wrote:
Please find attached a patch that addresses this problem. Apply on top of 2.2.11
sources with hg import .
Thanks for the patch. I had encountered the pop3 segfault issue
immediately after upgrade to 2.2.11 and reverted to 2.2.10. I have
installed the patch and been runn
Murry my mail delivery is working fine. The
first message even automatically creates the
Maildir structure like it should, all permissions correct.
Steffen Kaiser I will place the output of
dovecot n at the bottom of this message.
I've configured checkpassword which should be a
script
> Alan Schmitt writes:
> This is the crux of my question, I guess. Right now I don't deliver any
> mail, but use offlineimap to keep a local imap server (dovecot) in sync with
> a remote one. So my questions are: 1. Can I use dovecot's sieves if I don't
> deliver mail? 2. If not, how can I h
Am 13.02.2014 16:31, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
> My storage scheme is Maildir. Could someone point me to tools for
> maintaining or identifying problems problems with mail store. Also,
> description of common problems and how to resolve/prevent them.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
there is no problem wi
My storage scheme is Maildir. Could someone point me to tools for
maintaining or identifying problems problems with mail store. Also,
description of common problems and how to resolve/prevent them.
Thanks in advance
Am 13.02.2014 16:26, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
> My dovecot server storage scheme is Maildir. Is there no default mail
> box size quota? If yes, where do you set it?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (
My dovecot server storage scheme is Maildir. Is there no default mail
box size quota? If yes, where do you set it?
Thanks in advance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Murray Trainer wrote:
Haven't setup mail delivery yet but the lda will need some sort of
setuid access to write mail to the user folders.
That's one reason I switched to LMTP at last.
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
At last, I was finally able to find time and run a backtrace, I've
attached the file.
If you don't remember (and hey, you can blame you after all this time)
the problem is only with a couple (~10) of users among the hundreds of
thousands currently using the service.
Please let me know if I sho
Hi Steffen,
we tried the patch you suggested, but it does not resolve the issue, in
addition it involves pop3 only, and we are experimenting segfaults on
both pop3 and imap. We found more information about the problem:
deleting the index file, and letting the process recreate it, the
problem d
Hi Derek,
I have done this in reverse order. I used a short howto with users in LDAP.
It uses an an LDAP schema called iredmail.schema that lets me create virtual
domains and mail users that aren't posix users. I have my posix users under
ou=users and my virtual users under ou=domains.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Francesco Fiore wrote:
Is there any news for this problem?
read the other threads about the issue and find the patch in the 2.2.11
thread.
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Derek Winterstien wrote:
The virtual user part is working 100% with postfix and dovecot accepting mail
for each virtual alias and system account holders popping in to retrieve
their mail.
So that probably means that you've ad
Finally got it working. I eventually realized I needed to install
dovecot-pop3d and dovecot-imapd for it to work :-)
Murray
Original Message
From: Murray Trainer
Sent: 12 February 2014 12:51:00 PM AWST
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Getting Director Proxy Wo
* Teemu Huovila :
> Please find attached a patch that addresses this problem. Apply on top of
> 2.2.11 sources with hg import .
Working like a charm!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdam
Axel Luttgens wrote:
Hi Axel,
> Le 11 févr. 2014 à 08:34, Bernhard Schmidt a écrit :
>
>> [...]
>> so Dovecot should reject in RCPT TO phase, but according to the logs of the
>> upstream Postfix it does so after END-OF-DATA
>>
>> (host xxx[2001:xxx] said: 452 4.2.2
>> Quota exceeded (mailbox
Hi all!
Is there any news for this problem?
How can I be of help?
Currently this issue is very critical for me. I get about 10-15 segfault
per minute...
Thanks
Francesco
On 10/02/2014 11:58, Francesco Fiore wrote:
Hi,
I obtain continuosly segmentation fault of processes pop3 and imap, with
ve
I'm using PAM with padl_pam as a backend to get the users from an ldap
server.
userdb {
driver = passwd
args = blocking=yes uid=XXX gid=XXX
}
passdb {
driver = pam
args = failure_show_msg=yes dovecot
}
Thanks,
Daniel
On 02/13/2014 04:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 12.2.2014, at 16.
Le 11 févr. 2014 à 08:34, Bernhard Schmidt a écrit :
> [...]
> so Dovecot should reject in RCPT TO phase, but according to the logs of the
> upstream Postfix it does so after END-OF-DATA
>
> (host xxx[2001:xxx] said: 452 4.2.2
> Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is
> full) (in reply to end of DA
44 matches
Mail list logo
