[Dovecot] Patch to log the cipher suite used for TLS

2013-08-13 Thread Matthias Scheler
Hello, the attached patch for Dovecot 2.2.4 improves the logging to include information about the cipher suite used for a TLS connection. Here is an example log line: Aug 13 21:49:55 colwyn dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=CRAM-MD5, rip=2001:8b0:114:1::2, lip=2001:8b0:114:1::2,

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot security

2013-08-13 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Jay Khashan : > Hi, > > THIS IS URGENT > > I have Debian Linux machine which I installed as a mail server with postfix, > and dovecot. my mail server is setup to use SMTP relay. I currently have > ports 143, 995, 25 & SSMTP ports open. in the last few days I have been under > attack where e

[Dovecot] Dovecot security

2013-08-13 Thread Jay Khashan
Hi, THIS IS URGENT I have Debian Linux machine which I installed as a mail server with postfix, and dovecot. my mail server is setup to use SMTP relay. I currently have ports 143, 995, 25 & SSMTP ports open. in the last few days I have been under attack where email is being sent to fake email

Re: [Dovecot] HG changes affecting received headers

2013-08-13 Thread Thomas Leuxner
* Timo Sirainen 2013.08.13 20:04: > Thanks, fixed in hg. Confirmed. Thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Dovecot] HG changes affecting received headers

2013-08-13 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 13.8.2013, at 20.38, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > * Thomas Leuxner 2013.08.09 07:09: > >> * Timo Sirainen 2013.08.08 21:38: >> >>> Thanks. I thought I found all such occurrences, but looks like I missed >>> that one for some reason. Fixed: >>> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/9aa9944bd96

Re: [Dovecot] HG changes affecting received headers

2013-08-13 Thread Thomas Leuxner
* Thomas Leuxner 2013.08.09 07:09: > * Timo Sirainen 2013.08.08 21:38: > > > Thanks. I thought I found all such occurrences, but looks like I missed > > that one for some reason. Fixed: > > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/9aa9944bd96e > > Thanks, confirmed fixed. Some commit around 07

Re: [Dovecot] INBOX protected foldername?

2013-08-13 Thread Daniel Parthey
Since 2.1.17 fixes a lot of bugs of 2.1.7, I would propose you to open a bug report on the dovecot package in bugs.debian.org and list some of the bugs which have been fixed in the meantime. The easiest way to do so is to use the "reportbug" tool in Debian. At least then there is some hope to g

Re: [Dovecot] fail2ban

2013-08-13 Thread Aldo Reset
hi this filter is from dovecot wiki. bst regards. Le 12/08/2013 23:38, Laurent Papier a écrit : > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:50:15 +0200 > Aldo Reset wrote: > >> hi >> >> dovecot filter for fail2ban do not match: >> >> dovecot: pop3-login: Aborted login (tried to use disallowed plaintext auth):

Re: [Dovecot] INBOX protected foldername?

2013-08-13 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello, Are you talking about INBOX's children not being isible? That could be a bug in v2.1.7. INBOX itself always exists in top level. yes, exactly.subfolders of INBOX are hidden. I was confused at the first time because clients created own INBOX folders with subfolders and i misunderstood the