submission_host directive solved problem for me.
Thanks!
--
С уважением,
Костырев Александр
администратор Linux-систем
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On
Behalf Of Ben Morrow
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 1:58 PM
To: Костырев А
At 12PM +1100 on 8/05/13 you (Костырев Александр Алексеевич) wrote:
>
> I have a problem with mail redirection through sieve rules.
> I've configured sieve rule that redirects any mail coming to user to
> gmail mailbox (or whatever external mail system there is).
> But when sieve redirects any ma
Because it should be optional for users (to use or not to use filters).
--
С уважением,
Костырев Александр
администратор Linux-систем
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On
Behalf Of Reindl Harald
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 12:30
Am 08.05.2013 03:24, schrieb Костырев Александр Алексеевич:
> Good day!
>
> I have a problem with mail redirection through sieve rules.
> I've configured sieve rule that redirects any mail coming to user to gmail
> mailbox (or whatever external mail system there is).
> But when sieve redirects
Good day!
I have a problem with mail redirection through sieve rules.
I've configured sieve rule that redirects any mail coming to user to gmail
mailbox (or whatever external mail system there is).
But when sieve redirects any mail it puts vmail@%dovecot_hostname% into
envelope address, gives it
At 7PM -0600 on 6/05/13 you (Michael M Slusarz) wrote:
> Quoting Ben Morrow :
> > At 4PM -0600 on 6/05/13 you (Michael M Slusarz) wrote:
> >> Running into a weird issue in a mailbox that has 26+ keywords.
> >
> > You are using Maildir, yes? Maildir stores keywords in the flags field
> > of the
Am 08.05.2013 02:49, schrieb Ben Morrow:
> At 2AM +0200 on 8/05/13 you (Reindl Harald) wrote:
>> Am 08.05.2013 02:30, schrieb voy...@sbt.net.au:
>>> I have Doveot 2.1.1 on Centos, all's well
>>>
>>> user mails are kept for 60 days, then, 'aged off' (deleted)
>>>
>>> a Mac user with two domains
At 2AM +0200 on 8/05/13 you (Reindl Harald) wrote:
> Am 08.05.2013 02:30, schrieb voy...@sbt.net.au:
> > I have Doveot 2.1.1 on Centos, all's well
> >
> > user mails are kept for 60 days, then, 'aged off' (deleted)
> >
> > a Mac user with two domains and two dozen users asked me:
> >
> > can I
On Wed, May 8, 2013 10:34 am, Reindl Harald wrote:
> yes
> http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/Man
> Pages/man1/dovecot.1.html
>
>
> and for the archive itself imapsync and cron is his friend
Reindl,
thanks, so, dovecot should be there already, I'd just need to
Am 08.05.2013 02:30, schrieb voy...@sbt.net.au:
> I have Doveot 2.1.1 on Centos, all's well
>
> user mails are kept for 60 days, then, 'aged off' (deleted)
>
> a Mac user with two domains and two dozen users asked me:
>
> can I set a mail server on my home Mac server, and, 'mirror' the real ma
I have Doveot 2.1.1 on Centos, all's well
user mails are kept for 60 days, then, 'aged off' (deleted)
a Mac user with two domains and two dozen users asked me:
can I set a mail server on my home Mac server, and, 'mirror' the real mail
server mailboxes so than I can have an offline mail archive f
> I fixed the most obvious places in hg
Thanks. Unfortunately CATENATE still fails for me in various ways. I'm trying
to isolate test cases.
> Both of these are fixed in hg.
Confirmed. Thanks. I have no more major issues with URLAUTH at this time.
Hi Robert
yes all these users/groups are currently present (and were so before
compiling)
But as I could "fix" the problem with a symlink I won't spend much more
time in finding the root cause. It works and I'm happy. It's just my
private server where I know the only customer very well ;-)
Hi Tobi,
take a look at the output from 'configure --help'.
The problem is the imo stupid default of '--localstatedir'.
%<--
--localstatedir=DIR modifiable single-machine data [PREFIX/var]
%<---
hi Ben
I tried with removing the base_dir definition from my config, restartet
dovecot and checked with the commands you provided below:
<<
root@nordkap:~# doveconf -d base_dir
base_dir = /usr/local/var/run/dovecot
root@nordkap:~# doveconf base_dir
base_dir = /usr/local/var/run/dovecot
root@nor
I was able to replicate your problem with 2.1.16 rev 0fa68f3a8f6c (from
Stephan's auto-built packages).
I have the following configuration in 10-master.conf, and no special
configuration for the service in 90-quota.conf.
| service quota-status {
| executable = quota-status -p postfix
| inet_l
On 2013-05-07 2:22 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
El 07/05/13 02:19, Tim Groeneveld escribió:
I was thinking of splitting all of the mime parts and recombining
them later when the message was requested.
All of the parts would be hashed and stored separate to the
message. This would mean things like
Hello markh,
markh, 07.05.2013 (d.m.y):
> I have dovecot with postfix on ubuntu server 12
>
> I cannot log into outgoing server with outlook.
That's no dovecot issue. Outgoing mails will (or will not) be accepted
by your postfix (if it is configured in a way that permits relaying).
You should
I have dovecot with postfix on ubuntu server 12
I cannot log into outgoing server with outlook.
It logs into incoming server ok with outlook.
I can telnet pop3 and imap ok.
Looking at mail log it looks like dovecot auths: ok then shows
pop3-login: Login: user= USER#etc ok ...
then next line
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 07:34:44PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> >
> > I haven't actually tried it yet, so this is just from looking at the source
> > code: The policy service will reject (most) messages that would put a
> > mailbox over the quota limit in both 2.1 and 2.2, won't it?
> > That
Le 6 mai 2013 à 20:45, Kelsey Cummings a écrit :
> On 2013-05-03 19:13, Professa Dementia wrote:
>> When I specify that an email be
>> deleted from the server, I expect that it is *deleted*.
>
> While I see the point you're trying to make, I don't think it is valid. On
> our servers the deleted
Le 7 mai 2013 à 00:24, Noel Butler a écrit :
> On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 15:39 +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
>
>> Hmmm...
>> Let's consider the RFC's part related to, for example, the TOP command:
>>
>> If the POP3 server issues a positive response, then the
>> response given is multi-line.
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 01:52:55PM -0400, Oscar del Rio wrote:
> Have you tried 2.2.1?
Will do, but since the problem cannot be reliabily reproduced,
I have no way of knowing it is fixed. Is there anything in 2.2.1
changelog that hints it could be fixed?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
