Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole for 2.2?

2013-05-05 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 6/05/2013 12:02 PM, Noel Butler wrote: On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:56 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote: On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote: The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_ release this

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole for 2.2?

2013-05-05 Thread Noel Butler
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:56 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote: > > The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where > > this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_ > > release this is why it often takes 10 or so

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole for 2.2?

2013-05-05 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote: The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where this testing could show the bugs found and ironed out for a _real_ release this is why it often takes 10 or so point releases for most bugs to come to light and be fixed. I can assur

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole for 2.2?

2013-05-05 Thread Noel Butler
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 02:31 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Reindl Harald skrev den 2013-05-06 02:11: > > > and who forces you jumping to 2.2 right now? > > missing good examples on maillist that it works > > > there is also 2.0 and 2.1 > 2.0 = abysmal 2.1 as of around 2.1.12-ish I deemed dove

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole for 2.2?

2013-05-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Reindl Harald skrev den 2013-05-06 02:11: and who forces you jumping to 2.2 right now? missing good examples on maillist that it works there is also 2.0 and 2.1 and it will be stable 2.3 ? 1.x does nobody interest since years its removed in gentoo, funtoo, freebsd, opensuse, and proper

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole for 2.2?

2013-05-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.05.2013 01:59, schrieb Benny Pedersen: > Ralf Hildebrandt skrev den 2013-05-04 19:03: > >>> hg clone http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/ >>> It works. >> Same here. > > and dovecot 1.x still works here, seems that dovecot 2.x still is unstable > grounds for some users followin

Re: [Dovecot] Pigeonhole for 2.2?

2013-05-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Ralf Hildebrandt skrev den 2013-05-04 19:03: hg clone http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/ It works. Same here. and dovecot 1.x still works here, seems that dovecot 2.x still is unstable grounds for some users following this maillist i keep my problem going :) -- senders that pu

Re: [Dovecot] Idea: POP3 deletion as a flag

2013-05-05 Thread Noel Butler
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 05:29 -0700, Professa Dementia wrote: > On 5/3/2013 7:38 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > > > > > Incidentally, the last time I read the pop3 RFC, admittedly some decade > > or so ago (and yeah it's likely been updated since?) I can not recall > > there ever being a "MUST" or "SHOU

Re: [Dovecot] Idea: POP3 deletion as a flag

2013-05-05 Thread Gedalya
On 05/05/2013 03:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 5.5.2013, at 22.32, Gedalya wrote: On 05/05/2013 03:29 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 5.5.2013, at 22.06, Professa Dementia wrote: This is fine. The user is informed and makes a choice about the behavior of the server. The problem I have with

Re: [Dovecot] Idea: POP3 deletion as a flag

2013-05-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 5.5.2013, at 22.32, Gedalya wrote: > On 05/05/2013 03:29 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 5.5.2013, at 22.06, Professa Dementia wrote: >> >>> This is fine. The user is informed and makes a choice about the behavior >>> of the server. The problem I have with the proposed changes by Timo is

Re: [Dovecot] Idea: POP3 deletion as a flag

2013-05-05 Thread Gedalya
On 05/05/2013 03:29 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 5.5.2013, at 22.06, Professa Dementia wrote: This is fine. The user is informed and makes a choice about the behavior of the server. The problem I have with the proposed changes by Timo is that the user is *not* informed and has no choice. T

Re: [Dovecot] Idea: POP3 deletion as a flag

2013-05-05 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 5.5.2013, at 22.06, Professa Dementia wrote: > This is fine. The user is informed and makes a choice about the behavior of > the server. The problem I have with the proposed changes by Timo is that the > user is *not* informed and has no choice. The user may expect that the > server beha

Re: [Dovecot] Idea: POP3 deletion as a flag

2013-05-05 Thread Professa Dementia
On 5/5/2013 11:20 AM, Oscar del Rio wrote: On 03/05/2013 12:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: GMail doesn't delete mails when POP3 client issues a DELE command for it. Instead they just become invisible for future POP3 sessions, but they still exist for IMAP/webmail. The same could be implemented pret

Re: [Dovecot] Idea: POP3 deletion as a flag

2013-05-05 Thread Oscar del Rio
On 03/05/2013 12:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: GMail doesn't delete mails when POP3 client issues a DELE command for it. Instead they just become invisible for future POP3 sessions, but they still exist for IMAP/webmail. The same could be implemented pretty easily for Dovecot: - Add a new sett

Re: [Dovecot] OT/about SSDs

2013-05-05 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
Honestly guys, most people really have no long-term experiences with flash memory, be it SSD or other forms of. I can tell you from continously using simple CF-Cards as harddisks for about 5 years that _none_ ever got corrupted. Not a single one in 5 years. Taking into account that CF is really no

Re: [Dovecot] OT/about SSDs

2013-05-05 Thread Reindl Harald
and this will hurt all the naive people which start buying large mid-range SSD storages and wake up from their dreams the hard way over the long it will take years until large storages are relieable enough for critical data if you are not a fortune company with endless money a rotating media will

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Postfix Quota Policy Service

2013-05-05 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 05.05.2013 12:58, schrieb Andreas Meyer: > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > >> * Robert Schetterer : >> >>> quota_grace = 10%% >>> quota_status_success = DUNNO >>> quota_status_nouser = DUNNO >>> quota_status_overquota = "552 5.2.2 Mailbox is full / Mailbox ist voll" >> >> The very last l

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Postfix Quota Policy Service

2013-05-05 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 05.05.2013 12:47, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: > * Robert Schetterer : > >> quota_grace = 10%% >> quota_status_success = DUNNO >> quota_status_nouser = DUNNO >> quota_status_overquota = "552 5.2.2 Mailbox is full / Mailbox ist voll" > > The very last line "quota_status_overquota" does

Re: [Dovecot] OT/about SSDs (was: XFS vs EXT4 for mail storage)

2013-05-05 Thread dirk . jahnke-zumbusch
Hi all, I found a reference about the robustness of SSDs (and rotating rust) on c0t0d0s0.org (http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7578-Switching-off-SSDs-and-the-consequences.html) pointing to this interesting paper: http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~zhengm/papers/2013_FAST_PowerFaultSSD.pdf Just in

Re: [Dovecot] qmail-ldap LDA Delivery and sieve

2013-05-05 Thread Deepak
Hi I used the below filter in my dovecot-ldap-userdb.conf file, user_attrs = homeDirectory=home, uidNumber=uid, gidNumber=gid user_filter = (&(objectClass=posixAccount)(|(mail=%u)(mailAlternateAddress=%u) (uid=%u))) This above filter was working fine for me, and it's deliveri

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Postfix Quota Policy Service

2013-05-05 Thread Andreas Meyer
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Robert Schetterer : > > > quota_grace = 10%% > > quota_status_success = DUNNO > > quota_status_nouser = DUNNO > > quota_status_overquota = "552 5.2.2 Mailbox is full / Mailbox ist voll" > > The very last line "quota_status_overquota" doesn't work. No matt

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Postfix Quota Policy Service

2013-05-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Robert Schetterer : > quota_grace = 10%% > quota_status_success = DUNNO > quota_status_nouser = DUNNO > quota_status_overquota = "552 5.2.2 Mailbox is full / Mailbox ist voll" The very last line "quota_status_overquota" doesn't work. No matter which kind of quoting I'm using ', "",

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Postfix Quota Policy Service

2013-05-05 Thread Daniel Luttermann
On 2013-05-05, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 04.05.2013 21:11, schrieb Daniel Luttermann: >> May 4 20:55:16 mail dovecot: quota-status(dan...@dlutt.de): Error: user >> dan...@dlutt.de: Error reading configuration: >> net_connect_unix(/usr/var/run/dovecot/config) failed: Permission denied >> >>

Re: [Dovecot] XFS vs EXT4 for mail storage

2013-05-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 5/4/2013 10:54 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2013-05-04 11:20 AM, Marc Perkel wrote: >> For what it's worth if you can afford it I'd use SSD drives. My server >> screams since I went to SSD. > > Hi Marc, > > You have no idea how much I would love to use SSDs for this. But the > cost was simp

Re: [Dovecot] XFS vs EXT4 for mail storage

2013-05-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 5/4/2013 9:52 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2013-05-03 11:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> On 5/3/2013 9:21 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> On 2013-05-03 8:34 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: I assume /var will hold user mail dirs. >>> Yes, in /var/vmail >>> Do /var/ and /snaps reside on the sa