Am 04.05.2013 21:11, schrieb Daniel Luttermann:
> May 4 20:55:16 mail dovecot: quota-status(dan...@dlutt.de): Error: user
> dan...@dlutt.de: Error reading configuration:
> net_connect_unix(/usr/var/run/dovecot/config) failed: Permission denied
>
> Permissions of the Dovecot config service:
>
>
Hi
On april 17th, I upgraded from dovecot 2.1.13 to 2.2.0. Since that time,
I had two different users that reported received three incident of
messages that disapeared from their mailboxes.
The mailbox format is mbox on local FFS filesystem (no NFS), and I use
filesystem quotas (but both users a
On 2013-05-04, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 04.05.2013 15:06, schrieb Daniel Luttermann:
>> service quota-status {
>> client_limit = 1
>> executable = quota-status -p postfix
>> unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/quota-status {
>> group = postfix
>> mode = 0660
>> user = p
On 2013-05-04 1:36 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 5/1/2013 1:35 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-04-21 3:51 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
There is one issue with the doveadm-sieve plugin that I need to
solve before releasing it. That should happen some time in the
coming week.
Any update on when
On 5/1/2013 1:35 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-04-21 3:51 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 4/19/2013 7:53 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.1.tar.
Am 04.05.2013 19:25, schrieb Ulrich Zehl:
> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 06:02:36PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 04.05.2013 09:12, schrieb Noel Butler:
>>> The quota-grace I think was only bit not backported, is that right?
>>> Did Timo do or announce plan to do this, or not happening for 2.1
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 06:02:36PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 04.05.2013 09:12, schrieb Noel Butler:
> > The quota-grace I think was only bit not backported, is that right?
> > Did Timo do or announce plan to do this, or not happening for 2.1 only
> > 2.2?
>
> at my last knowledge it wa
* Luigi Rosa :
> Vijay Rajah said the following on 04/05/2013 18:37:
> > +1 This is holding up my migration to 2.2
> >
> > Thanks to all the developer's for this amazing software
>
> I migrated a couple of servers with a
>
> hg clone http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/
>
> It wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vijay Rajah said the following on 04/05/2013 18:37:
> +1 This is holding up my migration to 2.2
>
> Thanks to all the developer's for this amazing software
I migrated a couple of servers with a
hg clone http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonh
+1
This is holding up my migration to 2.2
Thanks to all the developer's for this amazing software
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2013-04-21 3:51 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
>> On 4/19/2013 7:53 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0300
Am 04.05.2013 15:06, schrieb Daniel Luttermann:
> service quota-status {
> client_limit = 1
> executable = quota-status -p postfix
> unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/quota-status {
> group = postfix
> mode = 0660
> user = postfix
> }
try
service quota-status {
executa
Am 04.05.2013 09:12, schrieb Noel Butler:
> The quota-grace I think was only bit not backported, is that right?
> Did Timo do or announce plan to do this, or not happening for 2.1 only
> 2.2?
at my last knowledge it wasnt backported and it will never done, so with
most setups, quota policy servic
On 2013-05-04 11:20 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
For what it's worth if you can afford it I'd use SSD drives. My server
screams since I went to SSD.
Hi Marc,
You have no idea how much I would love to use SSDs for this. But the
cost was simply not quite justified.
The price keeps coming down on t
Am 04.05.2013 17:20, schrieb Marc Perkel:
> For what it's worth if you can afford it I'd use SSD drives.
> My server screams since I went to SSD
how long running?
especially mailserver are write-expensive
short ago where a large SSD advterised at heise which
would be dead after a year with the
On 5/2/2013 4:16 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of finalizing the spec for my new dovecot VM, and
this is the last question I need to address...
I've read until I'm just about decided on XFS, but I have no
experience with it (been using reiserfs on my old box (@ 8 yrs o
On 2013-05-03 11:10 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/3/2013 9:21 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-05-03 8:34 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I assume /var will hold user mail dirs.
Yes, in /var/vmail
Do /var/ and /snaps reside on the same RAID array, physical disks?
Yes - vmware host is a Dell R51
Hello,
Am 03.05.2013 11:34, schrieb Jakob Hirsch:
forum, 30.04.2013 16:55:
Now i have found the solution.
It seems to help to ask you. ;)
The solution was to change from
listen = [::]
to
listen = *, [::]
There is no explanation for it - just try and error ...
This is not dovecot's fault. S
Daniel Luttermann wrote:
> When I use
>
> service config {
> unix_listener config {
> group =
> mode = 0666
> user =
> }
> }
>
> then the error "permission denied" doesn't occur anymore but the error
>
> warning: access table unix:private/quota-status entry has empty value
On 4.5.2013, at 15.29, Professa Dementia wrote:
>> Incidentally, the last time I read the pop3 RFC, admittedly some decade
>> or so ago (and yeah it's likely been updated since?) I can not recall
>> there ever being a "MUST" or "SHOULD" when it comes to deleting
>> messages (it might have been d
On 2013-05-04, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 03.05.2013 23:34, schrieb Daniel Luttermann:
>> Zum Einsatz kommt aktuell Postfix 2.10.0 und Dovecot 2.2.1.
>>
>> Die Dovecot Quota Konfiguration sieht so aus, wie bei sys4
>> beschrieben:
>>
>> service quota-status {
>> executable = quota-status -p
On 5/3/2013 7:38 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Incidentally, the last time I read the pop3 RFC, admittedly some decade
or so ago (and yeah it's likely been updated since?) I can not recall
there ever being a "MUST" or "SHOULD" when it comes to deleting
messages (it might have been deliberately omitte
On 4.5.2013, at 13.32, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> What happens to quotas in places where it is enforced? Where does the
> undeleted mail go? Does it still count towards the quota?
Good point. It does count towards quota. Worth mentioning also in the setting
docs. The mail isn't really "delete
What happens to quotas in places where it is enforced? Where does the
undeleted mail go? Does it still count towards the quota?
On 3 May 2013 19:14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> GMail doesn't delete mails when POP3 client issues a DELE command for it.
> Instead they just become invisible for future P
On 4/05/2013 8:10 PM, Axel Luttgens wrote:
Le 4 mai 2013 à 00:44, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
I didn't ask what their main reason for this was, but for me it
would be: "Oops, I accidentally configured my new email client as
POP3 instead of IMAP, and now it deleted everything from my INBOX."
With la
On Sat, 04 May 2013 08:13:44 +0300, Ravi Kanchan
wrote:
But it is not woking in our setup its not block or marking SPAM mail
which is receiving through IMAP or POP3 services.
Antispam plugin isn't supposed to block nor mark mails.
It's only used to teach your spam system should it make an
Le 4 mai 2013 à 00:44, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> I didn't ask what their main reason for this was, but for me it would be:
> "Oops, I accidentally configured my new email client as POP3 instead of IMAP,
> and now it deleted everything from my INBOX." With lazy_expunge the user
> would have to e
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 10:19 +0200, Forum wrote:
>
> But what is the meaning of the addional "*," now?
> Listening specially to IPV4 and IPV6?
>
* has always meant ipv4
:: has always meant ipv6
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello,
Am 03.05.2013 11:34, schrieb Jakob Hirsch:
forum, 30.04.2013 16:55:
Now i have found the solution.
It seems to help to ask you. ;)
The solution was to change from
listen = [::]
to
listen = *, [::]
There is no explanation for it - just try and error ...
This is not dovecot's fault. S
timo
thank you very much for your wonderful work on dovecot
the new feature that you are thinking about is very useful
this is an excellent solution and is used by a quite a few large isps /
mailing providers like rediff. And i believe blackberry also does
something similar. ie if configure the
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 07:35 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> du solltest nur Dovecot 2.2.1 verwenden
> der quota code in 2.1 ist "nicht voellig vollstaendig"
> das setup sieht auf den ersten Blick ok aus
>
The quota-grace I think was only bit not backported, is that right?
Did Timo do or anno
30 matches
Mail list logo
